| Literature DB >> 35888208 |
Marta Baselga1, Iratxe Uranga-Murillo1,2,3, Diego de Miguel1,2, Maykel Arias1,2,3, Victor Sebastián1,4,5,6, Julián Pardo1,2,3, Manuel Arruebo1,4,5,6.
Abstract
The use of face masks and air purification systems has been key to curbing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 aerosols in the context of the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, some masks or air conditioning filtration systems are designed to remove large airborne particles or bacteria from the air, being limited their effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2. Continuous research has been aimed at improving the performance of filter materials through nanotechnology. This article presents a new low-cost method based on electrostatic forces and coordination complex formation to generate antiviral coatings on filter materials using silver nanoparticles and polyethyleneimine. Initially, the AgNPs synthesis procedure was optimized until reaching a particle size of 6.2 ± 2.6 nm, promoting a fast ionic silver release due to its reduced size, obtaining a stable colloid over time and having reduced size polydispersity. The stability of the binding of the AgNPs to the fibers was corroborated using polypropylene, polyester-viscose, and polypropylene-glass spunbond mats as substrates, obtaining very low amounts of detached AgNPs in all cases. Under simulated operational conditions, a material loss less than 1% of nanostructured silver was measured. SEM micrographs demonstrated high silver distribution homogeneity on the polymer fibers. The antiviral coatings were tested against SARS-CoV-2, obtaining inactivation yields greater than 99.9%. We believe our results will be beneficial in the fight against the current COVID-19 pandemic and in controlling other infectious airborne pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antiviral coating; facemask; filter; polyethyleneimine; silver nanoparticles
Year: 2022 PMID: 35888208 PMCID: PMC9318907 DOI: 10.3390/ma15144742
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Optimized parameters from the original AgNPs synthesis.
| Synthesis | Molar Concentration | Mixing Process | Stirring Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original | 2 mM AgNO3; 2 mM TSC; 2.4 mM NaBH4 | Not defined | ‘Vigorous’ |
| A | 2 mM AgNO3; 2 mM TSC; 2.4 mM NaBH4 | Drop by drop | ~1250 rpm |
| B | 1 mM AgNO3; 1 mM TSC; 1.2 mM NaBH4 | Drop by drop | ~1250 rpm |
| C | 2 mM AgNO3; 2 mM TSC; 1.2 mM NaBH4 | Drop by drop | ~1250 rpm |
| D | 1 mM AgNO3; 1 mM TSC; 2.4 mM NaBH4 | 1 mL in 1 mL | ~1250 rpm |
| E | 2 mM AgNO3; 2 mM TSC; 2.4 mM NaBH4 | 3 mL in 3 mL | ~1250 rpm |
| F | 1 mM AgNO3; 1 mM TSC; 2.4 mM NaBH4 | Drop by drop | ~1500 rpm |
Figure 1Schematic representation of the silver nanoparticle synthesis method.
Figure 2(a–g) TEM images of the silver nanoparticles obtained by following the different chemical syntheses together with their histograms showing the particle size distributions and their UV-Vis spectra on the first day of synthesis (black line) and at 3 (red line), 5 (blue line), and 7 days (green line) after synthesis. Particle size histograms were plotted after considering a population n = 100. Where # refers to the number of particles.
Figure 3Backscattered electron SEM images of polypropylene spunbond fibers from a surgical mask coated with AgNPs–PEI, using two different PEI concentrations and three AgNPs colloid concentrations. The micrographs of the samples obtained with a higher amount of AgNPs and a higher PEI concentration show a significantly superior silver load. These images demonstrate that the concentration of AgNPs is as important as the amount of PEI to improve the silver incorporation yield. Bottom: EDX analysis on a selected coated area.
Figure 4Macroscopic images and backscattered electrons SEM of different fabrics. A superior incorporation of AgNPs was observed in the fibers of smaller diameter (e.g., HEPA H13 filter). These images show that the silver load is homogeneous and high in all the polymeric samples studied (spunbond, hygienic facemask, meltblown, and HEPA filter).
Boundary conditions used for evaluating the release of AgNPs from coated polymeric substrates (polypropylene fibers from spunbond). All samples were initially sonicated in Milli-Q water to remove non-adhering particles. Some were sonicated again in other media, as indicated in the table. The second sonication medium varied from test to test.
| Sample | Cleaning Sonication | First Sonication Conditions | Second Sonication Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | - | - |
| 1 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | - |
| 2 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 10 s in Milli-Q Water |
| 3 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 5 s in Tap Water (pH 7) |
| 4 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s. in Milli-Q Water | 10 s in Tap Water (pH 7) |
| 5 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 5 s in PBS (10%) |
| 6 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 10 s in PBS (10%) |
| 7 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 10 s in Tap Water (pH 4.5) |
| 8 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 10 s in Tap Water (pH 9) |
| 9 | 20 s in Milli-Q Water | 15 s in Milli-Q Water | 10 s in Tap Water (pH 14) |
Figure 5Percentage of AgNPs loss in each of the experiments performed with the AgNPs–PEI coating on polypropylene fibers (spunbond) observing three characteristic absorbance peaks of silver by atomic absorbance spectrometry (MP-AES).
Figure 6Determination of the infective viral load (a) in materials coated with silver nanoparticles and the control after 2 h and (b) in coated spunbond after 10 min, after 2 h after infection, and after 4 h after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus at room temperature.
Figure 7Determination of the infective viral load (a) in spunbond coated with PEI and (b) in PEI dissolved in milli-Q water 2 h after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus at room temperature. LD stands for limit of detection.
Determination of the PEI toxicity in Vero cells at different dilutions.
| Percent of Toxicity (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dilution 0 | Dilution 1:10 | Dilution 1:100 | Dilution 1:1000 | Dilution 1:10,000 | |
| Spunbond PEI coated (10 mg/mL) | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Spunbond PEI coated (1 mg/mL) | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Spunbond PEI coated (0.1 mg/mL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PEI aqueous dissolution (10 mg/mL) | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PEI aqueous dissolution (1 mg/mL) | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| PEI aqueous dissolution (0.1 mg/mL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |