| Literature DB >> 34072004 |
Madalina Elena David1,2, Rodica-Mariana Ion1,2, Ramona Marina Grigorescu1, Lorena Iancu1, Alina Maria Holban3, Adrian Ionut Nicoara4, Elvira Alexandrescu1, Raluca Somoghi1, Mihaela Ganciarov1, Gabriel Vasilievici1, Anca Irina Gheboianu5.
Abstract
In this study, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were decorated with different types of nanoparticles (NPs) in order to obtain hybrid materials with improved antimicrobial activity. Structural and morphological analysis, such as Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller technique were used in order to investigate the decoration of the nanotubes with NPs. Analysis of the decorated nanotubes showed a narrow size distribution of NPs, 7-13 nm for the nanotubes decorated with zinc oxide (ZnO) NPs, 15-33 nm for the nanotubes decorated with silver (Ag) NPs and 20-35 nm for the nanotubes decorated with hydroxyapatite (HAp) NPs, respectively. The dispersion in water of the obtained nanomaterials was improved for all the decorated MWCNTs, as revealed by the relative absorbance variation in time of the water-dispersed nanomaterials. The obtained nanomaterials showed a good antimicrobial activity; however, the presence of the NPs on the surface of MWCNTs improved the nanocomposites' activity. The presence of ZnO and Ag nanoparticles enhanced the antimicrobial properties of the material, in clinically relevant microbial strains. Our data proves that such composite nanomaterials are efficient antimicrobial agents, suitable for the therapy of severe infection and biofilms.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial properties; biofilm control; decorated nanotubes; hybrid materials; nanoparticles
Year: 2021 PMID: 34072004 PMCID: PMC8228541 DOI: 10.3390/nano11061415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1FTIR spectra of the MWCNTs_ZnO.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of the MWCNTs_Ag.
Figure 3Raman spectra of MWCNTs decorated with NPs.
Relative intensity of D, G and G’ bands and ID/IG band ratio of MWCNTs decorated with NPs.
| Nanomaterials | D Band (cm−1) | G Band (cm−1) | G’ Band (cm−1) | ID/IG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNTs [ | 1348 | 1606 | 2698 | 0.839 |
| MWCNTs_Ag | 1357 | 1613 | 2717 | 0.841 |
| MWCNTs_HAp | 1360 | 1615 | 2723 | 0.842 |
| MWCNTs_ZnO | 1367 | 1618 | 2734 | 0.844 |
Figure 4XRD of MWCNTs_ZnO.
Figure 5XRD of MWCNTs_Ag.
Summary of the XRD characterization of MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs.
| Sample | 2θ, ° | 2θ, rad | β, ° | L, Å | L, nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNTs [ | 25.53 | 0.4456 | 4.08 | 20.18 | 2.018 |
| MWCNTs_HAp | 25.79 | 0.4501 | 1.28 | 64.33 | 6.433 |
| MWCNTs_ZnO | 25.58 | 0.4464 | 6.59 | 12.49 | 1.249 |
| MWCNTs_Ag | 25.66 | 0.4479 | 2.036 | 40.46 | 4.046 |
Figure 6TEM micrographs of the MWCNTs_ZnO (a,b) and MWCNTs_Ag (c,d).
Figure 7SEM images illustrating the decoration of MWCNTs with HAp (a), ZnO (b) and Ag (c) NPs.
Chemical composition (EDX) of MWCNTs decorated with NPs.
| Element | MWCNTs_ZnO | MWCNTs_Ag | MWCNTs_HAp [ |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | 38.21 ± 0.28 | 70.35 ± 0.81 | 26.33 ± 0.28 |
| O | 40.88 ± 0.53 | 12.35 ± 0.12 | 20.80 ± 0.22 |
| Zn | 19.91 ± 1.02 | - | - |
| Ag | - | 16.14 ± 0.6 | - |
| Ca | - | - | 31.04 ± 0.3 |
| P | - | - | 21.42 ± 0.23 |
| Other | 1.00 ± 0.072 | 1.16 ± 0.085 | 0.41 ± 0.014 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
BET surface area analysis of MWCNTs and MWCNTs decorated with NPs.
| Sample | BET Analysis | |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Area (m2/g) | Mean Pore Diameter (nm) | |
| MWCNTs | 35.121 ± 0.63 | 3.614 ± 0.56 |
| MWCNTs_HAp | 69.497 ± 1.79 | 13.705 ± 0.88 |
| MWCNTs_ZnO | 35.965 ± 0.94 | 3.810 ± 0.37 |
| MWCNTs_Ag | 25.016 ± 0.25 | 2.959 ± 0.08 |
Figure 8Isotherm curves of the MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs.
Figure 9Variation in time of relative absorbance for MWCNT-based solution dispersed in water. Mean values of triplicate independent experiments and standard deviation are shown.
Figure 10Graphical representation of the diameter of the growth inhibition zone of the microbial strains tested for MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs. Data represented were mean of triplicate values with standard deviation.
Figure 11Graphical representation of MIC values of MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs on microbial strains tested at 24 h incubation at 37 °C. Data represented were mean of triplicate values with standard deviation.
Figure 12Graphical representation of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs on Gram-negative strains. Data represented were mean of triplicate values with standard deviation.
Figure 13Graphical representation of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs on Gram-positive strains. Data represented were mean of triplicate values with standard deviation.
Figure 14Graphical representation of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs on the fungal pathogen C. albicans. Data represented were mean of triplicate values with standard deviation.
ANOVA table for variation in time of relative absorbance for MWCNTs and decorated MWCNTs dispersed in water.
| Source of Variation | SS * | df * | MS * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWCNTs | 100136.81 | 1 | 100136.81 | 17.92 | 0.000253568 | Significant |
| MWCNTs_ZnO | 99793.98 | 1 | 99793.98 | 17.86 | 0.000258447 | Significant |
| MWCNTs_Ag | 100104.95 | 1 | 100104.95 | 17.91 | 0.000254021 | Significant |
| MWCNTs_HAp | 100003.28 | 1 | 100003.28 | 17.90 | 0.000255464 | Significant |
* Sum of squares (SS), degrees of freedom (df), mean square (MS).
ANOVA table of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs on the investigated strains.
| Source of Variation | SS * | df * | MS * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 13.50 | 11 | 3.31 | 39.31 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Concentration | 0.69 | 7 | 0.11 | 2.98 | 0.0011 | Significant |
| Absorbance | 12.81 | 4 | 3.20 | 54.63 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Lack of fit | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Error | 1.40 | 24 | 0.05 | - | - | - |
| Total | 14.91 | 35 | - | - | - | - |
* Sum of squares (SS), degrees of freedom (df), mean square (MS).
ANOVA table of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs_ZnO on the investigated strains.
| Source of Variation | SS * | df * | MS* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7.31 | 11 | 1.86 | 25.69 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Concentration | 0.66 | 7 | 0.11 | 4.96 | 0.0019 | Significant |
| Absorbance | 6.65 | 4 | 1.66 | 74.08 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Lack of fit | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Error | 0.53 | 24 | 0.02 | - | - | - |
| Total | 7.85 | 35 | - | - | - | - |
* Sum of squares (SS), degrees of freedom (df), mean square (MS).
ANOVA table of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs_HAp on the investigated strains.
| Source of Variation | SS * | df * | MS * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 13.40 | 11 | 3.25 | 29.04 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Concentration | 1.20 | 7 | 0.20 | 3.03 | 0.02 | Significant |
| Absorbance | 12.20 | 4 | 3.05 | 46.25 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Lack of fit | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Error | 1.58 | 24 | 0.06 | - | - | - |
| Total | 14.98 | 35 | - | - | - | - |
* Sum of squares (SS), degrees of freedom (df), mean square (MS).
ANOVA table of the minimum concentration for eradication of biofilm for MWCNTs_Ag on the investigated strains.
| Source of Variation | SS * | df * | MS * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7.93 | 11 | 2.00 | 42.47 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Concentration | 0.31 | 7 | 0.05 | 3.36 | 0.01 | Significant |
| Absorbance | 7.62 | 4 | 1.90 | 123.27 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| Lack of fit | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Error | 0.37 | 24 | 0.01 | - | - | - |
| Total | 8.30 | 35 | - | - | - | - |
* Sum of squares (SS), degrees of freedom (df), mean square (MS).