| Literature DB >> 35885289 |
Chanporn Chaosap1, Achara Lukkananukool2, Sineenart Polyorach2, Kritapon Sommart3, Panneepa Sivapirunthep1, Rutcharin Limsupavanich2.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of dietary energy density in rice straw and cassava pulp fermented total mixed ration on pH, cooking loss, Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF), and collagen content of 2- or 14-d-aged native Thai cattle (NTC) Longissimus thoracic (LT) muscles and fatty acids and ribonucleotides of 2-d-aged LT. Eighteen yearling NTC (Bos indicus) were randomly divided into three dietary treatments (T1 = 8.9, T2 = 9.7, and T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg), with six bulls per treatment. The results showed that T1 had the highest WBSF (p < 0.05). However, T2 had similar WBSF to T3 (p > 0.05). With aging, cooking loss increased (p < 0.01), while WBSF decreased (p < 0.01). Insoluble and total collagen decreased with aging (p < 0.05). Dietary energy density had no effect (p > 0.05) on collagen content, ribonucleotides and most fatty acids. However, T1 had more (p < 0.05) decanoic (C10:0), vaccenic (C18:1n9t), trans-linolelaidic (C18:2n6t), eicosatrienoic (C20:3n6), and docosadienoic (C22:2) acids than T2 and T3. In terms of lowest feed cost with comparable tenderness to T2 and highest energy density, T3 may be well suited for feeding NTC. Aging for 14 days improves LT tenderness, but its cooking loss may affect yield and juiciness.Entities:
Keywords: aging; beef; collagen solubility; inosine monophosphate; meat flavor
Year: 2022 PMID: 35885289 PMCID: PMC9315666 DOI: 10.3390/foods11142046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Ingredients and chemical composition of dietary-energy-density treatment in native Thai cattle diet [32].
| Item | Dietary Treatment 1 | Cassava Pulp | Rice Straw | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| Ingredients, %DM | |||||
| Rice straw | 50 | 30 | 10 | ||
| Cassava pulp | 10 | 30 | 50 | ||
| Cassava chip | 7 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Palm meal | 12 | 12 | 12 | ||
| Soybean meal | 14 | 14 | 14 | ||
| Rice bran | 5 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Urea | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | ||
| Mineral 2 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | ||
| Limestone | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||
| Analyzed chemical composition, %DM | |||||
| Dry matter | 46.2 | 41.1 | 33.2 | 23.8 | 92.8 |
| Organic matter | 88.4 | 90.8 | 93.6 | 98.2 | 88.0 |
| Crude protein | 13.8 | 14.3 | 15.0 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
| Ether extract | 3.5 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 51.1 | 44.3 | 38.1 | 32.8 | 77.0 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 36.8 | 34.0 | 25.4 | 20.0 | 51.6 |
| Energy density, MJ/kg DM | |||||
| Gross energy | 17.0 | 17.4 | 17.6 | 16.4 | 16.2 |
| Metabolizable energy (calculated) | 8.9 | 9.7 | 10.5 | 9.6 | 6.5 |
| Cost, Baht/kg FM | 4.96 | 4.74 | 3.95 | 0.42 | 2.31 |
| Cost, Baht/kg DM | 13.19 | 12.61 | 10.51 | 1.74 | 2.49 |
1 T1 = 8.9, T2 = 9.7, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg DM, ME = Metabolizable energy density. 2 Chemical compositions were calcium = 164.00 g, cobalt = 0.04 g, copper = 1.00 g, iodine = 0.04 g, iron = 2.00 g, magnesium = 2.89 g, manganese = 11.00 g, phosphorus = 80.00 g, selenium = 0.03 g, sodium = 136.60 g, sulfur =19.20 g and carrier = 1000.00 g.
Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 and aging time (A) on pH, cooking loss, and Warner–Bratzler shear force (WBSF) of Longissimus thoracis muscles of native Thai cattle.
| Trait | Treatment (T) 1 | Aging (A) | RMSE 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | 2 Days | 14 Days | T | A | T*As | ||
| pH | 5.65 | 5.56 | 5.59 | 5.56 | 5.63 | 0.18 | 0.543 | 0.349 | 0.969 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 20.81 | 20.78 | 23.87 | 19.95 b | 23.68 a | 2.91 | 0.051 | 0.002 | 0.066 |
| WBSF (kg) | 8.91 a | 7.26 b | 7.74 b | 9.40 a | 6.34 b | 1.42 | 0.024 | <0.0001 | 0.802 |
a,b LS means having different superscripts within the same main effect are different (p < 0.05). 1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error.
Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 and aging time (A) on soluble, insoluble, and total collagen contents (mg/g wet weight) and collagen solubility (%) in Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle.
| Collagen | Treatment (T) 1 | Aging Time | RMSE 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | 2 Days | 14 Days | T | A | T*A | ||
| Soluble | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.537 | 0.372 | 0.574 |
| Insoluble | 2.58 | 3.00 | 2.76 | 2.96 a | 2.61 b | 0.42 | 0.095 | 0.023 | 0.468 |
| Total | 2.75 | 3.20 | 2.95 | 3.14 a | 2.80 b | 0.43 | 0.077 | 0.037 | 0.462 |
| % solubility | 6.32 | 6.34 | 6.32 | 5.68 | 6.97 | 2.19 | 0.999 | 0.110 | 0.585 |
a,b LS means with different superscripts within the same main effect are different (p < 0.05). 1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error.
Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 on fatty acid composition of Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle aged for 2 days.
| Trait | Treatment 1 | RMSE 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| Fatty acid composition | g/100 g total fatty acids (mg/100 g fresh meat) | ||||
| Decanoic acid (C10:0) | 0.33 a (14.82) | 0.12 b (7.79) | 0.14 b (5.46) | 0.11 | 0.024 |
| Lauric acid (C12:0) | 0.11 (5.01) | 0.11 (5.99) | 0.08 (3.26) | 0.05 | 0.549 |
| Tridecanoic acid (C13:0) | 0.07 (2.77) | 0.06 (3.69) | 0.06 (2.53) | 0.03 | 0.987 |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | 2.73 (116.90) | 3.02 (174.41) | 2.52 (107.25) | 0.76 | 0.636 |
| Myristoleic acid (C14:1) | 0.89 (38.82) | 1.10 (62.70) | 1.18 (49.60) | 0.36 | 0.449 |
| Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) | 0.26 (10.71) | 0.19 (10.86) | 0.20 (8.45) | 0.06 | 0.162 |
| Ginkgolic acid (C15:1) | 0.12 (5.60) | 0.10 (6.21) | 0.13 (5.13) | 0.03 | 0.510 |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 20.08 (836.20) | 20.67 (1209.13) | 18.35 (789.84) | 1.83 | 0.201 |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) | 3.31 (140.01) | 3.73 (215.27) | 3.98 (169.45) | 0.52 | 0.160 |
| Margaric acid (C17:0) | 0.69 (29.99) | 0.70 (39.99) | 0.69 (29.90) | 0.10 | 0.998 |
| Heptadecenoic acid (C17:1) | 0.51 (21.97) | 0.51 (29.23) | 0.62 (26.37) | 0.08 | 0.139 |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 7.95 (328.81) | 7.21 (424.02) | 6.41 (275.35) | 1.50 | 0.310 |
| Vaccenic acid (C18:1n9t) | 0.52 a (21.75) | 0.15 b (8.82) | 0.24 b (10.18) | 0.12 | 0.003 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1n9c) | 58.28 (2444.18) | 59.27 (3443.02) | 61.75 (2710.62) | 4.58 | 0.498 |
| Trans-Linolelaidic acid (C18:2n6t) | 0.49 a (20.50) | 0.20 b (11.49) | 0.20 b (8.09) | 0.15 | 0.022 |
| Linoleic acid (C18:2n6c) | 1.44 (57.41) | 0.80 (46.81) | 0.92 (37.25) | 0.43 | 0.082 |
| γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3n6) | 0.14 (6.01) | 0.66 (40.80) | 0.75 (27.58) | 0.49 | 0.148 |
| ∝-Linolenic acid (C18:3n3) | 0.03 (1.61) | 0.04 (2.24) | 0.04 (1.64) | 0.01 | 0.947 |
| Arachidic (C20:0) | 0.19 (8.07) | 0.17 (10.24) | 0.17 (7.64) | 0.04 | 0.498 |
| Erucic acid (C20:1n9) | 0.18 (7.37) | 0.15 (8.69) | 0.17 (7.06) | 0.03 | 0.502 |
| Heneicosanoic Acid (C21:0) | 0.12 (4.87) | 0.14 (8.52) | 0.17 (8.06) | 0.04 | 0.116 |
| Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n6) | 0.31 a (13.09) | 0.09 b (5.23) | 0.18 b (6.63) | 0.10 | 0.022 |
| Docosanoic Acid (C22:0) | 0.10 (3.96) | 0.06 (4.06) | 0.09 (3.47) | 0.05 | 0.623 |
| Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n3) + Arachidonic acid (C20:4n6) | 0.55 (22.16) | 0.31 (18.61) | 0.41 (15.52) | 0.23 | 0.295 |
| Docosadienoic acid (C22:2) | 0.07 a (2.97) | 0.03 b (1.87) | 0.04 b (1.30) | 0.02 | 0.044 |
| Nervonic acid (C24:1) | 0.13 (5.52) | 0.08 (4.70) | 0.09 (3.48) | 0.05 | 0.176 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n3) | 0.37 (15.77) | 0.30 (18.22) | 0.41 (17.35) | 0.09 | 0.274 |
| Total fatty acid (g/100 g) | 4.19 | 5.82 | 4.34 | 1.38 | 0.188 |
| SFA (saturated fatty acid) | 32.63 | 32.46 | 28.90 | 3.77 | 0.282 |
| MUFA (monounsaturated fatty acid) | 63.96 | 65.11 | 68.15 | 4.49 | 0.359 |
| PUFA (polyunsaturated fatty acid) | 3.41 | 2.43 | 2.95 | 1.06 | 0.369 |
| UFA (unsaturated fatty acid) | 78.73 | 77.17 | 80.45 | 3.77 | 0.282 |
| UFA:SFA | 2.12 | 2.11 | 2.46 | 0.37 | 0.326 |
| PUFA:SFA | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.274 |
a,b LS means having different superscripts in the same row are different (p < 0.05).; 1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error; SFA= C10:0 + C12:0 + C13:0 + C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C20:0 + C21:0 + C22:0; MUFA = C14:1 + C15:1 + C16:1 + C17:1 + C18:1n9t + C18:1n9c + 20:1n9 + C24:1; PUFA = C18:2n6t + C18:2n6c + C18:3n6 + C18:3n3 + C20:3n6 + (C20:3n3+C20:4n6) + C22:2 + C22:6n3; UFA = MUFA + PUFA.
Effect of dietary-energy-density treatment (T) 1 on ribonucleotide content of Longissimus thoracis muscle of native Thai cattle aged for 2 days.
| Ribonucleotides (mg/100 g) | Treatment 1 | RMSE 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| Hypoxanthine | 5.04 | 4.21 | 5.31 | 1.17 | 0.424 |
| Inosine | 19.85 | 21.08 | 21.41 | 6.69 | 0.927 |
| Inosine monophosphate | 219.04 | 211.29 | 213.95 | 15.07 | 0.707 |
| Guanosine monophosphate | 2.86 | 2.78 | 3.04 | 0.20 | 0.277 |
1 T1 = 8.9 MJ ME/kg, T2 = 9.7 MJ ME/kg, T3 = 10.5 MJ ME/kg; 2 root mean square error.