Literature DB >> 35857252

Evaluating the dynamic behaviour of bone anchored hearing aids using a finite element model and its applications to implant stability assessment.

Mostafa Mohamed1, Lindsey Westover2.   

Abstract

The dynamic behavior of osseointegrated implants can be used for the non-invasive evaluation of the condition of the bone-implant-interface (BII). The Advanced System for Implant Stability Testing (ASIST) is a vibration measurement system that relies on an impact technique and an analytical model to compute the interface stiffness and the ASIST stability coefficient ([Formula: see text]). The objective of this work is to develop a finite element (FE) model capable of capturing the dynamic behaviour of the bone-anchored hearing aid under the ASIST loading condition. The model was validated with previously collected in vitro and in vivo data which were compared to the model's acceleration responses and [Formula: see text] scores. Similar acceleration responses were obtained, and the maximum absolute differences in [Formula: see text] scores between the FE model and the in vitro and in vivo data were 1.15% and 5.48% respectively. The model was then used to show the existence of a relationship between the rod's acceleration response and the BII stress field. Finally, the model was used to interpret the factors that affect the stiffness parameters of the ASIST analytical model. The interface stiffness and the system's dynamic properties were more influenced ([Formula: see text]) by the BII material and friction coefficient compared to the implant geometry. In this work, a finite element model of the bone anchored hearing aid was used to simulate the dynamic behaviour of the bone-implant system under the ASIST's loading conditions. The model was first validated with previously collected experimental and clinical results. The validated model was then used to study the relationship between the impact rod's acceleration response and the response at the bone implant interface. Finally, the model was used to formulate a better understanding on the influencing factors on the interface stiffness.
© 2022. International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element modelling; Implant dynamic response; Implant stability; Osseointegration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35857252     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02607-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   3.079


  13 in total

Review 1.  Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review.

Authors:  R Brånemark; P I Brånemark; B Rydevik; R R Myers
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  The resonance frequencies and mode shapes of dental implants: Rigid body behaviour versus bending behaviour. A numerical approach.

Authors:  V Pattijn; C Van Lierde; G Van der Perre; I Naert; J Vander Sloten
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Biomechanical determinants of the stability of dental implants: influence of the bone-implant interface properties.

Authors:  Vincent Mathieu; Romain Vayron; Gilles Richard; Grégory Lambert; Salah Naili; Jean-Paul Meningaud; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Finite element simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in a dental implant for biomechanical stability assessment.

Authors:  Romain Vayron; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Romain Bosc; Salah Naili; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-01-26

5.  Effects on the torsional vibration behavior in the investigation of dental implant osseointegration using resonance frequency analysis: a numerical approach.

Authors:  Min Zhai; Bing Li; Dehua Li
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs.

Authors:  Elisabetta Maria Zanetti; Stefano Ciaramella; Michele Calì; Giulia Pascoletti; Massimo Martorelli; Riccardo Asero; David C Watts
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Authors:  Zeynep Gümrükçü; Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Comparison of implant stability measurement devices for bone-anchored hearing aid systems.

Authors:  Lindsey Westover; Gary Faulkner; William Hodgetts; Don Raboud
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.426

9.  Advanced System for Implant Stability Testing (ASIST).

Authors:  L Westover; G Faulkner; W Hodgetts; D Raboud
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Longitudinal Evaluation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implant Stability Using the Advanced System for Implant Stability Testing (ASIST).

Authors:  Lindsey Westover; Gary Faulkner; William Hodgetts; Fraaz Kamal; Edmond Lou; Don Raboud
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.