Literature DB >> 29119541

Influence of implant number, length, and tilting degree on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: a finite element study.

Zeynep Gümrükçü1, Yavuz Tolga Korkmaz2.   

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the stress values, created in peri-implant region as a consequence of loading on fixed hybrid dentures that was planned with different implant numbers, lengths, or tilting angulations. Thirteen three-dimensional (3D) finite element analysis models were generated with four, five, or seven implants (group A, B, and C). Except the distal implants, all implants were modeled at 4.1 mm (diameter) and 11.5 mm (length) in size. Distal implants were configured to be in five different lengths (6, 8, 11.5, 13, and 16 mm) and three different implant inclination degrees (0°, 30°, and 45°). A 150-N load was applied vertically on prosthesis. Released stresses were evaluated comparatively. The lowest von Mises stress values were found in group C, in the 11.5-mm implant model. Tilting the distal implants 30° caused higher stress values. In 45°-tilting implant models, lower stress values were recorded according to the 30°-tilting models. The ideal implant number is seven for an edentulous maxilla. Tilting the implants causes higher stress values. A 45° inclination of implant causes lower stress values according to the 30° models due to a shorter cantilever. The ideal implant length is 11.5 mm.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrophic maxilla; Implant number; Short implant; Stress analysis; Tilted implant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29119541     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-017-1737-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  56 in total

Review 1.  Wide-diameter implants: new concepts.

Authors:  M Davarpanah; H Martinez; M Kebir; D Etienne; J F Tecucianu
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant stability in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a mathematical study of the sinus floor augmentation.

Authors:  Gabor Tepper; Robert Haas; Werner Zechner; Wolfgang Krach; Georg Watzek
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.977

3.  Evaluation of the structural behavior of three and four implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Santiago Correa; Juliana Ivancik; Juan Felipe Isaza; Mauricio Naranjo
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 4.642

4.  Combined effects of implant insertion depth and alveolar bone quality on periimplant bone strain induced by a wide-diameter, short implant and a narrow-diameter, long implant.

Authors:  Hsuan-Yu Chou; Sinan Müftü; Dinçer Bozkaya
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Evaluation of the glenoid implant survival using a biomechanical finite element analysis: influence of the implant design, bone properties, and loading location.

Authors:  P Mansat; J Briot; M Mansat; P Swider
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.

Authors:  Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção; Lucas Fernando Tabata; Juliana Aparecida Delben; Erica Alves Gomes; Edson Antonio Capello de Sousa; Eduardo Passos Rocha
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.046

7.  Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor.

Authors:  Omer Lutfi Koca; Gurcan Eskitascioglu; Aslihan Usumez
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Finite Element Analysis of Bone Stress around Micro-Implants of Different Diameters and Lengths with Application of a Single or Composite Torque Force.

Authors:  Ying-juan Lu; Shao-hai Chang; Jian-tao Ye; Yu-shan Ye; Yan-song Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Tilted implants for full-arch rehabilitations in completely edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Nicolò Cavalli; Bruno Barbaro; Davide Spasari; Francesco Azzola; Alberto Ciatti; Luca Francetti
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-10-23

10.  The Comparison of Stress Distribution with Different Implant Numbers and Inclination Angles In All-on-four and Conventional Methods in Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Fariba Saleh Saber; Shima Ghasemi; Rodabeh Koodaryan; Amirreza Babaloo; Nader Abolfazli
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-12-30
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluating the dynamic behaviour of bone anchored hearing aids using a finite element model and its applications to implant stability assessment.

Authors:  Mostafa Mohamed; Lindsey Westover
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Influence of Implant Tilting and Length on the Biomechanics of Single-Tooth Restoration: A Finite Element Analysis in Atrophic Mandible.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Naiara Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra; Iñigo Morales Martín; Luis Saracho Rotaeche
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Three-dimensional analysis of the relationship between the structure of maxillary central incisor and the preparation of dental all-ceramic.

Authors:  Peng Wang; Fangfang Sun; Qing Yu; Guofeng Wu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Navigated Antral Bone Expansion (NABE): a prospective study on 35 patients with 4 months of follow-up post implant loading.

Authors:  Luigi V Stefanelli; Nicola Pranno; Francesca De Angelis; Silvia La Rosa; Antonella Polimeni; Stefano Di Carlo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.