Literature DB >> 3584690

Level discrimination as a function of level for tones from 0.25 to 16 kHz.

M Florentine, S Buus, C R Mason.   

Abstract

Difference limens for level (delta L in dB = 20 log [(p + delta p)/p], where p is pressure) were measured as a function of level for tones at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 kHz. At each frequency, test levels encompassed the range from near threshold to 95 dB SPL in steps of 10 dB or smaller. The stimulus duration was 500 ms and the interstimulus interval was 250 ms. An adaptive two-alternative forced-choice procedure with feedback was used. Results for six normal listeners show individual differences among listeners, but the general trends seen in the average data clearly are present in the individual data and show the following. First, the delta Ls at all but the highest frequencies are generally smaller at high levels than at low levels. Second, the delta Ls at equal SPLs are largely independent of frequency up to about 4 kHz, but increase with frequency above 4 kHz. Third, at 8 and 10 kHz, the delta Ls are clearly nonmonotonic functions of level, showing consistent deterioration in the mid-level delta Ls relative to the low- and high-level delta Ls. The present data are discussed qualitatively in terms of current models of level discrimination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3584690     DOI: 10.1121/1.394505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying the information in auditory-nerve responses for level discrimination.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Naturalistic auditory contrast improves spectrotemporal coding in the cat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Monty A Escabí; Lee M Miller; Heather L Read; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Comparison of level discrimination, increment detection, and comodulation masking release in the audio- and envelope-frequency domains.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Stephan D Ewert; Laurel H Carney; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of Intensity Discrimination between Children Using Cochlear Implants and Typically Developing Children.

Authors:  Shubha Tak; Asha Yathiraj
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.017

5.  The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.

Authors:  Sittiprapa Isarangura; Ann C Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 6.  Intensity-invariant coding in the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Dynamic range adaptation to sound level statistics in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Supra-Threshold Hearing and Fluctuation Profiles: Implications for Sensorineural and Hidden Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

Review 9.  Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.

Authors:  Mark D Fletcher; Carl A Verschuur
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Sarah Verhulst; Luke Shaheen; M Charles Liberman; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.