| Literature DB >> 35840638 |
Zayana M Al-Dahmani1, Xiaogang Li2, Lucas M Wiggenhauser2,3, Hannes Ott2, Paul D Kruithof1, Sergey Lunev1, Fernando A Batista1, Yang Luo4, Amalia M Dolga4, Nicholas M Morton5, Matthew R Groves6,7, Jens Kroll2, Harry van Goor8,9.
Abstract
Thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (TST, EC 2.8.1.1), also known as Rhodanese, was initially discovered as a cyanide detoxification enzyme. However, it was recently also found to be a genetic predictor of resistance to obesity-related type 2 diabetes. Diabetes type 2 is characterized by progressive loss of adequate β-cell insulin secretion and onset of insulin resistance with increased insulin demand, which contributes to the development of hyperglycemia. Diabetic complications have been replicated in adult hyperglycemic zebrafish, including retinopathy, nephropathy, impaired wound healing, metabolic memory, and sensory axonal degeneration. Pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (Pdx1) is a key component in pancreas development and mature beta cell function and survival. Pdx1 knockdown or knockout in zebrafish induces hyperglycemia and is accompanied by organ alterations similar to clinical diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy. Here we show that pdx1-knockdown zebrafish embryos and larvae survived after incubation with thiosulfate and no obvious morphological alterations were observed. Importantly, incubation with hTST and thiosulfate rescued the hyperglycemic phenotype in pdx1-knockdown zebrafish pronephros. Activation of the mitochondrial TST pathway might be a promising option for therapeutic intervention in diabetes and its organ complications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35840638 PMCID: PMC9287301 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16320-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Thiosulfate exposure does not affect viability or pronephros morphology in healthy zebrafish larvae. (A) Representative overview of the zebrafish appearance at 48 hpf with and without 10 mM thiosulfate. Zebrafish embryos exposed to 10 mM thiosulfate did not show any gross morphological changes compared to controls. (B) Representative visualization of the pronephros phenotype in Tg(wt1b:EGFP) embryos at 48 hpf with and without 10 mM thiosulfate. Thiosulfate did not have any visible effect on the pronephros morphology compared to controls. (C) Evaluation of the survival in zebrafish larvae exposed to thiosulfate for 6 days. Thiosulfate did not lead to any detrimental effects regarding survival in any of the studied concentrations (n = 15 for each condition). (D) Evaluation of the pronephric neck length in Tg(wt1b:EGFP) embryos at 48 hpf exposed to different thiosulfate concentrations. Thiosulfate did not significantly alter the pronephric neck length in healthy zebrafish larvae (at least 10 larvae per group were analyzed). Scale bars are 500 μm in (A) and 50 μm in (B). Statistics utilized one-way ANOVA + Sidak’s post-hoc (D); mean + SD reported; *p < 0.05.
Figure 2Thiosulfate and human thiosulfate sulfurtransferase treatment rescues pdx1 morpholino-induced hyperglycemic pronephros damage. (A) Representative visualization of the zebrafish pronephros in Tg(wt1b:EGFP) embryos at 48 hpf with different experimental conditions. Embryos injected with only a control morpholino (Co-Mo) show the typical pronephros morphology at 48 hpf, while injection with the pdx1 morpholino (pdx1-Mo) leads to a hyperglycemia-mediated pronephros phenotype with an increased glomerular length and a shortened pronephric neck length. Treatment via either exposure to 10 mM thiosulfate (TS) or injection of 1 nl human thiosulfate sulfurtransferase (hTST) at a concentration of 1 µg/µL rescued the pronephros phenotype in the pdx1 morphants. (B–C) Evaluation of the pronephros phenotype in Tg(wt1b:EGFP) embryos at 48 hpf shows significant rescue of both (B) glomerular length and (C) pronephric neck length by TS and hTST treatment in pdx1 morphants (n = 45 for Co-Mo and pdx1-Mo, n = 30 for the TS and hTST groups). Measurements for glomerular length (l) and pronephric neck length (n) have been marked and the glomerulus was encircled for one pronephric side in two images in (A) as example. Lengths given in (B–C) represent the total sum of both the left and right side measurements added up. The scale bar is 50 μm in (A). Statistics utilized one-way ANOVA + Sidak’s post-hoc (B–C); mean + SD reported; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.