| Literature DB >> 35808577 |
Liang Chen1,2,3,4, Guoping Cheng1,2,3, Shu Meng1,2,3, Yi Ding1,2,3.
Abstract
Guided tissue/bone regeneration (GTR/GBR) is currently the main treatment for alveolar bone regeneration. The commonly used barrier membranes in GTR/GBR are collagen membranes from mammals such as porcine or cattle. Fish collagen is being explored as a potential substitute for mammalian collagen due to its low cost, no zoonotic risk, and lack of religious constraints. Fish scale is a multi-layer natural collagen composite with high mechanical strength, but its biomedical application is limited due to the low denaturation temperature of fish collagen. In this study, a fish scale collagen membrane with a high denaturation temperature of 79.5 °C was prepared using an improved method based on preserving the basic shape of fish scales. The fish scale collagen membrane was mainly composed of type I collagen and hydroxyapatite, in which the weight ratios of water, organic matter, and inorganic matter were 20.7%, 56.9%, and 22.4%, respectively. Compared to the Bio-Gide® membrane (BG) commonly used in the GTR/GBR, fish scale collagen membrane showed good cytocompatibility and could promote late osteogenic differentiation of cells. In conclusion, the collagen membrane prepared from fish scales had good thermal stability, cytocompatibility, and osteogenic activity, which showed potential for bone tissue engineering applications.Entities:
Keywords: bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; collagen; fish scale; hydroxyapatite; osteogenic differentiation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35808577 PMCID: PMC9269230 DOI: 10.3390/polym14132532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Primer Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
| OCN | Forward: CGCCAGGGTGAAGAACTA |
| Reverse: TACGCTGTGGAAGCCAA | |
| OPN | Forward: CGGAGACCATGCAGAGA |
| Reverse: CGTAAGCCAAGCTATCACC | |
| RUNX2 | Forward: TCGGAAAGGGACGAGAG |
| Reverse: TTCAAACGCATACCTGCAT | |
| ACTB | Forward: CCTCACTGTCCACCTTCCA |
| Reverse: GGGTGTAAAACGCAGCTCA |
Figure 1DAPI staining of FS with cells (A) and decellularized FS (B).
Figure 2SEM images of surface (D–F) and longitudinal section (A,B) of FS (C).
Figure 3FTIR (A), thermogravimetric analysis (B), and DSC (C).
Figure 4Morphology of BMSCs (A), flow cytometry analysis (B), and multipotent differentiation (C).
Figure 5Cell adhesion of BMSCs on the FS (A) and BG (B).
Figure 6CCK8 assay of control, BG and FS group (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 7ALP staining (A) and ALP activity assay (B) of glass slide control, BG and FS group (NS, p > 0.05).
Figure 8Relative quantitative assay of mineralized deposits (A) and ELISA analysis (B) of glass slide control, BG and FS group (** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).
Figure 9The relative expression of RUNX2 (A), OCN (B), and OPN (C) in the glass slide control, BG and FS group (NS, p > 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).