Literature DB >> 20380512

Superficial topography and porosity of an absorbable barrier membrane impacts soft tissue response in guided bone regeneration.

Ronaldo Barcellos de Santana1, Carolina Miller Leite de Mattos, Carlos Eduardo Francischone, Thomas Van Dyke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surface topography and porosity of barrier membranes is suggested to impact the soft and hard tissue response. In this study, the specific soft and hard tissue response characteristics of a synthetic polylactide membrane are evaluated including soft tissue inflammation, osteogenesis, and osteopromotion.
METHODS: Analysis of porosity and surface topography of the test material was performed by scanning electron microscopy. Transosseous parietal defects were surgically created bilaterally in 32 BalbC/ByJ mice and treated either with the barrier (test) or sham-operated (control). Healing was assessed histologically and histomorphometrically with quantification of bone bridging.
RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy analyses of the barrier revealed a microstructure resembling cancellous bone. Interconnecting pores and channels, measuring between 6 and 60 microm in diameter, formed by smooth internal walls were observed throughout the device. Two distinct patterns of porosity were observed. The external surface of the membrane was characterized by a highly porous structure, with minimal interporous nodes and average pore sizes ranging between 6 and 20 microm in diameter. The internal surface was characterized by a minimal porous structure, with significant interporous nodes and average pore sizes ranging between 18 and 60 mum in diameter. Histomorphometric analyses demonstrated increased bone bridging by 60% and 300% in membrane-treated sites after 14 and 28 days of healing, respectively. The rough surface of the barrier contained significantly more giant cells, whereas the smooth surface contained significantly more inflammatory cells.
CONCLUSION: The surface topographies engineered on different sides of the barrier promote differential soft tissue responses leading, however, to similar amounts of enhanced bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20380512     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2010.090592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  12 in total

1.  In vitro Cell Proliferation Assay of Demineralized Dentin Material Membrane in Osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 Cells.

Authors:  Pratiwi Soesilawati; Andra Rizqiawan; Retno Indrawati Roestamadji; Ahmad Rizal Arrosyad; Muhammad Alwino Bayu Firdauzy; Noor Hayaty Abu Kasim
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2021-10-29

Review 2.  Customized Barrier Membrane (Titanium Alloy, Poly Ether-Ether Ketone and Unsintered Hydroxyapatite/Poly-l-Lactide) for Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Yilin Shi; Jin Liu; Mi Du; Shengben Zhang; Yue Liu; Hu Yang; Ruiwen Shi; Yuanyuan Guo; Feng Song; Yajun Zhao; Jing Lan
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  In vivo bone regeneration assessment of offset and gradient melt electrowritten (MEW) PCL scaffolds.

Authors:  Naghmeh Abbasi; Ryan S B Lee; Saso Ivanovski; Robert M Love; Stephen Hamlet
Journal:  Biomater Res       Date:  2020-10-01

4.  [Barrier effect of improved porcine small intestinal submucosa absorbable membrane on early healing of mandibular defects in rabbits].

Authors:  B W Li; W Y Wu; L Tang; Y Zhang; Y H Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-10-18

Review 5.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

6.  A Novel Bilayer Polycaprolactone Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration: Combining Electrospinning and Emulsion Templating.

Authors:  Betül Aldemir Dikici; Serkan Dikici; Gwendolen C Reilly; Sheila MacNeil; Frederik Claeyssens
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Synthesis and Characterizations of a Collagen-Rich Biomembrane with Potential for Tissue-Guided Regeneration.

Authors:  Marcos J Silva; Carolina P Gonçalves; Kleber M Galvão; Paulo H P D'Alpino; Fábio D Nascimento
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2019-09-02

Review 8.  The Impact of Early Saliva Interaction on Dental Implants and Biomaterials for Oral Regeneration: An Overview.

Authors:  Marcel Ferreira Kunrath; Christer Dahlin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  The role of barrier membranes for guided bone regeneration and restoration of large bone defects: current experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Rozalia Dimitriou; George I Mataliotakis; Giorgio Maria Calori; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of Bio-Gen with biocollagen compared with Bio-Gen with connective tissue in the treatment of class II furcation defects: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Niloofar Jenabian; Sina Haghanifar; Avideh Maboudi; Ali Bijani
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.