| Literature DB >> 35782504 |
Rene Rothweiler1, Christian Gross1, Emely Bortel2, Sarah Früh2, Javier Gerber2, Elodie Boller3, Jonas Wüster4, Andres Stricker1, Tobias Fretwurst1, Gerhard Iglhaut1, Susanne Nahles4, Rainer Schmelzeisen1, Bernhard Hesse2,3, Katja Nelson1.
Abstract
In oral- and maxillofacial bone augmentation surgery, non-vascularized grafts from the iliac crest demonstrate better clinical performance than alveolar bone grafts. The underlying mechanisms are not fully understood but are essential for the enhancement of bone regeneration scaffolds. Synchrotron Radiation µ-CT at a pixel size of 2.3 μm was used to characterize the gross morphology and the vascular and osteocyte lacuna porosity of patient-matched iliac crest/alveolar bone samples. The results suggest a difference in the spatial distribution of the vascular pore system. Fluid simulations reveal the permeability tensor to be more homogeneous in the iliac crest, indicating a more unidirectional fluid flow in alveolar bone. The average distance between bone mineral and the closest vessel pore boundary was found to be higher in alveolar bone. At the same time, osteocyte lacunae density is higher in alveolar bone, potentially compensating for the longer average distance between the bone mineral and vessel pores. The present study comprehensively quantified and compared the 3D microarchitecture of intraindividual human alveolar and iliac bone. The identified difference in pore network architecture may allow a bone graft from the iliac crest to exhibit higher regeneration potential due to an increased capacity to connect with the surrounding pore network of the residual bone. The results may contribute to understanding the difference in clinical performance when used as bone grafts and are essential for optimization of future scaffold materials.Entities:
Keywords: bone microarchitecture; morphometry; osteocytes; permeability tensor; synchrotron μ-CT
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782504 PMCID: PMC9248932 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.862395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
Patient and sample data.
| Patient index | Gender | Age (years) | Biopsy index | Biopsy origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Female | 67 | P1 (AB) | Maxilla (region 11) |
| P1 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P2 | Male | 67 | P2 (AB) | Mandibulae (region 46) |
| P2 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P3 | Male | 48 | P3 (AB) | Mandibulae (region 45) |
| P3 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P4 | Male | 54 | P4 (AB) | Mandibulae (region 41) |
| P4 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P5 | Female | 56 | P5 (AB) | Maxilla (region 11) |
| P5 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P6 | Male | 46 | P6 (AB) | Maxilla (region 11) |
| P6 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P7 | Female | 52 | P7 (AB) | Maxilla (region 11) |
| P7 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P8 | Male | 52 | P8 (AB) | Mandibulae (region 46) |
| P8 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P9 | Female | 65 | P9 (AB) | Mandibulae (region 45) |
| P9 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| P10 | Female | 53 | P10 (AB) | Maxilla (region 11) |
| P10 (IC) | Anterior superior iliac crest | |||
| N = 10 | 50% female; 50% male | Ø 56 SD: 7.69 | N = 20 | Recipient site: 50% maxilla, 50% mandibular, Donor site: 100% anterior superior iliac crest |
| Age is given as the mean and standard deviation (SD) | ||||
FIGURE 1Representative reconstruction and selection of volumes of interest–Sample P4 (AB)/(IC). (A) 3D-rendering of an alveolar bone sample. (B) 3D-rendering of an iliac crest sample. The IC sample is greater in size than the AB sample. Furthermore, the AB primarily consists of cortical bone, as opposed to the IC sample, which is clearly composed of a trabecular and a cortical region. (C) Differentiation of the IC sample into a cortical and a trabecular region and definition of volumes of interest (VOIs).
FIGURE 2Exemplary definition of the axis and calculation of angles phi and theta—Sample P4 (IC). (A) Volume rendering of the full sample indicating the region used for further analysis of the vessel orientation. (B) Surface renderings of the intracortical canal system. (C–F) Angles phi and theta were computed for each segment afterward.
FIGURE 3Alveolar bone vs. anterior iliac crest—selected parameters. (A) Boxplots visualizing porosity (%) of the examined bone types. (B) Surface area (SA) to bone volume (BV) ratio (SA/BV; 1/mm) of the examined bone types as boxplots. (C) Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) of the examined bone types as boxplots. (D) Scatterplot with SA/BV on the y-axis and bone volume fraction (BV/TV) on the x-axis (E) Osteocyte lacunar density of the examined bone types as boxplots. (F) Scatterplot with the lacunar density on the y-axis and SA/BV on the x-axis.
FIGURE 4IPS arrangement—distance of mineralized bone to the intracortical surface ICS. (A,B) Graphs showing the average 50% (A) and 95% (B) distance of the mineralized bone to the closest ICS.
Parameters describing the arrangement of the intracortical pore system (IPS).
| Sample ID | IPS surface to total volume (1/mm) | IPS surface to bone volume (1/mm) | IPS porosity (%) | IPS mean pore size (µm) | Dist. mineral 50% (µm) | Dist. mineral 95% (µm) | Dist. IPS 50% (µm) | Dist. IPS 95% (µm) | Phi bin var (E) | Theta bin var (E) | Level of alignment (var bin phi * var bin theta) | Level of alignment ratio (IC/AB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P4 (AB) | 3.0 | 3.5 | 16 | 59.2 | 73.1 | 157.5 | 23.8 | 99.2 | 4.4–3 | 4.4–3 | 1.9E-05 | 4.9 |
| P4 [IC (CO)] | 5.6 | 6.9 | 24 | 56.2 | 46.5 | 102.4 | 18.6 | 66.5 | 5.7–3 | 16.5–3 | 9.5E-05 | |
| P8 (AB) | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2 | 43.4 | 105.6 | 207.7 | 7.3 | 22.2 | 5.0–3 | 6.2–3 | 3.1E-05 | 1.7 |
| P8 [IC (CO)] | 3.1 | 3.2 | 5 | 47.0 | 63.6 | 129.8 | 7.9 | 30.6 | 5.0–3 | 10.7–3 | 5.3E-05 | |
| P9 (AB) | 2.3 | 2.5 | 6 | 49.6 | 99.7 | 212.2 | 14.3 | 64.7 | 2.3–3 | 7.4–3 | 1.7E-05 | 9.0 |
| P9 [IC (CO)] | 6.1 | 7.5 | 23 | 75.1 | 54.3 | 114.0 | 15.9 | 49.7 | 5.8–3 | 27.0–3 | 15.6E-05 |
FIGURE 5Summary of the skeletonized vessel pores comparing the volumes, thickness, and orientation of the skeleton fragments between AB and IC (CO). Visualizations of (A) vessel network, (B) thickness, (C) volume, (D) angle phi, (E) angle theta, and (F) cord length.
FIGURE 6Streamline (first three columns) and velocities (last column) of fluid simulations performed along x, y, and z axes for alveolar and iliac crest of one patient (P9). The absolute permeability values of this patient are shown in Table 3.
Summary of the fluid simulations quantifying the direction-dependent permeability of the different bone specimens.
| From experiment | From tensor | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | λ1 | λ2 | λ3 | #cubes | Dimensions | TV in mm³ | (λ1 + λ2)/(2λ3) | TV in mm³ | EV2/EV1 | EV3/E1 | (E2 + E3)/(2E1) |
| P4 (AB) | — | — | — | 0 | — | NaN | 3.2 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.06 | |
| P4 [IC(CO)] | 1.47 | 0.01 | 2.19 | 3 | 504³ vxl | 1.50 | 0.34 | 6.4 | 0.50 | 0.12 | 0.31 |
| P8 (AB) | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 1 | 504³ vxl | 1.05 | 0.03 | 5.4 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.20 |
| P8 [IC(CO)] | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.43 | 2 | 370³ vxl | 0.59 | 0.17 | 5.2 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 0.26 |
| P9 (AB) | 0.25 | 0.15 | 1.65 | 1 | 552³ vxl | 1.97 | 0.12 | 9.9 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 0.16 |
| P9 [IC(CO)] | 1.64 | 0.11 | 1.53 | 1 | 430³ vxl | 0.93 | 0.57 | 1.8 | 0.57 | 0.05 | 0.31 |
Fluid simulations were performed for virtually cut cubes separately for X, Y, and Z directions and their means and ratios are calculated.