| Literature DB >> 35760776 |
Amitesh Anand1,2, Arjun Patel3, Ke Chen3, Connor A Olson3, Patrick V Phaneuf3, Cameron Lamoureux3, Ying Hefner3, Richard Szubin3, Adam M Feist3,4, Bernhard O Palsson5,6.
Abstract
The bacterial respiratory electron transport system (ETS) is branched to allow condition-specific modulation of energy metabolism. There is a detailed understanding of the structural and biochemical features of respiratory enzymes; however, a holistic examination of the system and its plasticity is lacking. Here we generate four strains of Escherichia coli harboring unbranched ETS that pump 1, 2, 3, or 4 proton(s) per electron and characterized them using a combination of synergistic methods (adaptive laboratory evolution, multi-omic analyses, and computation of proteome allocation). We report that: (a) all four ETS variants evolve to a similar optimized growth rate, and (b) the laboratory evolutions generate specific rewiring of major energy-generating pathways, coupled to the ETS, to optimize ATP production capability. We thus define an Aero-Type System (ATS), which is a generalization of the aerobic bioenergetics and is a metabolic systems biology description of respiration and its inherent plasticity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35760776 PMCID: PMC9237125 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30877-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 17.694
Fig. 1Generation and evolution of unbranched ETS variants.
a Schematic showing the respiratory enzymes involved in the flow of electrons from NADH (donor) to oxygen (acceptor). NDH-I and NDH-II are the proton pumping and non-pumping NADH: quinone oxidoreductase, respectively. Dashed arrows for CBDs represent the vectorial mode of PMF generation. b Scheme for generating ETS variants translocating 1, 2, 3, or 4 proton(s) per electron. uETS is the unevolved strain and eETS is the evolved strain. A–D are the four independently evolved lineages of each strain. c Growth rates of ETS variants before and after ALE. d, f Predictive mechanistic interpretation of the impact of mutations observed in the evolved strains of (d) ETS-3H (sdhA) and (f) ETS-4H (yjjX) mutations on the structure and function of the protein. Mutations displayed are those from this study and other ALE experiments in ALEdb seen to mutate these genes[10]. Horizontal tracks display the reported features associated with the region of the protein. The mutations collected from ALEdb refer to experiments from the following set, respectively[12,49,50]. Protein structures showing the amino acid residues mutated in (e) SdhA and (g) YjjX. Source Data available in Supplementary Table 3.
Fig. 2Metabolic rewiring supporting growth rate optimization in the ETS variants.
a Transcriptional and metabolic flux distribution correlations between evolved replicates and unevolved strains. Correlation of all four evolved replicates of each ETS variant has been calculated with corresponding unevolved strain and has been presented as Pre-vs.-Post ALE strains correlation. Correlation of all four evolved replicates of each ETS variant has been calculated among each other and has been presented as Endpoint Replicates correlation. b Expression changes in the alternate NqRED and O2RED in the unbranched ETS variants. c Computed metabolic flux maps depicting the central metabolism in the evolved ETS variants as compared to respective unevolved ETS variants. Key metabolites are indicated in the figure as follows: glc glucose, g6p D-glucose-6-phosphate, f6p D-fructose-6-phosphate, 6 pg 6-phospho-D-gluconate, ru5p D-ribulose-5-phosphate, r5p ɑ-D-ribose 5-phosphate, xu5p D-xylulose-5-phosphate, s7p sedoheptulose-7-phosphate, e4p D-erythrose-4-phosphate, dha dihydroxyacetone, dhap dihydroxyacetone-phosphate, kdpg 2-keto-3-deoxy-6-phosphogluconate, g3p glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate, pep phosphoenolpyruvate, pyr pyruvate, ac acetate, accoa acetyl-CoA, oaa oxaloacetate, cit citrate, acon cis-aconitate, icit isocitrate, akg 2-oxoglutarate, succoa succinyl-CoA, succ succinate, fum fumarate, mal malate. [oxPPP oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, EMP Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway, ED Entner–Doudoroff pathway, TCA Tricarboxylic acid cycle]. Source Data available in Supplementary Table 2 and provided RNA-seq data.
Fig. 3Systems-level examination of ETS variants.
a Aero-type classification of the ETS variants. Broken lines on the aero-type plot show growth rate isoclines. b ME-model-based examination of the ATP production (left y-axis) and proteome allocation (right y-axis) in the ETS variants. The ATP produced per ATS proteome is approximately the same. c Contributions of different ATP-producing reactions towards total ATP production. ATP production by (i) ATP synthase (ATPS) in oxidative phosphorylation, (ii) acetate kinase (ACKr) in mixed acid fermentation, (iii) succinyl-CoA synthetase (SUCOAS) in the TCA cycle, and (iv) phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK) in the glycolysis pathway is shown in the histogram. The mean and standard deviation values are calculated using four independently evolved replicates of each strain. d Tradeoffs in the expression levels of genes of iModulons associated with anoxic (y-axis) and oxic (x-axis) energetics underlie the rewiring of the ATS to allow all variants to achieve approximately the same growth rate. The lowest aerotype (ETS-1H) has high anoxic/low oxic gene expression while the highest aerotype (ETS-4) exhibits the opposite. The gene composition of the iModulons is shown in Supplementary Table 4. The outliers of the replicates for an ETS variant are reflections of the differences in their genotypes (Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 1). e Estimation of the number of protons required for the phosphorylation of ADP by ATP synthase (proton-to-ATP ratio) using the ME-model and the experimental data. Individual values of four independently evolved replicates of each ETS variant have been shown on the plot and corresponding median and range of values have been presented. Source Data available in Supplementary Table 3 and provided RNA-seq data.
Reactions that consume or produce ATP and corresponding stoichiometric coefficient.
| Reactiona | ATP coefficient |
|---|---|
| PPK | −1 |
| PPK2 | −1 |
| ATPS4rpp | 1 |
| PFK_2 | −1 |
| HEX1 | −1 |
| PYK | 1 |
| PFK | −1 |
| PPS | −1 |
| PGK | −1 |
| GLGC | −1 |
| PFK_3 | −1 |
| GART | −1 |
| PPAKr | 1 |
| ACCOAL | −1 |
| ACS | −1 |
| ACKr | −1 |
| SUCOAS | −1 |
aReaction IDs with corresponding reactions in the BiGG Database (bigg.ucsd.edu).