Carlos A Puig1, Tanya L Hoskin2, Courtney N Day2, Elizabeth B Habermann1,2,3, Judy C Boughey4. 1. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 2. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. boughey.judy@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) downstages tumor size and nodal disease. This study evaluates national practice patterns of NAC use in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. METHODS: We identified patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) with hormone receptor-negative invasive breast cancer (2004-2012). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations and trends across time. RESULTS: Of 171,985 patients, 130,723 (76.0%) received chemotherapy and 41,262 (24.0%) did not. Chemotherapy use was higher in young patients and higher T- and N-stage disease (all p < 0.001). Of those patients treated with chemotherapy, 23,165 (17.7%) received NAC and 107,558 (82.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). NAC use increased from 2004 to 2012 (13.0-23.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42; p < 0.001). Higher clinical T stage (ORs 3.63, 11.81, and 22.34 for cT2, cT3, and cT4a-c, respectively, vs. cT1) and cN+ disease (OR 2.86) [each p < 0.001] were associated with NAC, as were younger patient age and better Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. Furthermore, BCS rate was higher in the NAC group in cT2 and cT3 tumors (aOR 1.17 and 1.45, respectively; both p < 0.001). In patients with cN+ disease, NAC converted 43.7% to pN0. Less extensive axillary surgery (one to five nodes removed) was more likely in cN+ patients treated with NAC (aOR 1.66; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In hormone receptor-negative breast cancer, chemotherapy was mostly administered adjuvantly, but neoadjuvant use increased over time and was more likely in younger patients and higher T- and N-stage disease. Node-positive patients treated with NAC were less likely to have pathologically positive nodes and more likely to have less extensive axillary surgery.
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) downstages tumor size and nodal disease. This study evaluates national practice patterns of NAC use in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. METHODS: We identified patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) with hormone receptor-negative invasive breast cancer (2004-2012). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess associations and trends across time. RESULTS: Of 171,985 patients, 130,723 (76.0%) received chemotherapy and 41,262 (24.0%) did not. Chemotherapy use was higher in young patients and higher T- and N-stage disease (all p < 0.001). Of those patients treated with chemotherapy, 23,165 (17.7%) received NAC and 107,558 (82.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). NAC use increased from 2004 to 2012 (13.0-23.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.42; p < 0.001). Higher clinical T stage (ORs 3.63, 11.81, and 22.34 for cT2, cT3, and cT4a-c, respectively, vs. cT1) and cN+ disease (OR 2.86) [each p < 0.001] were associated with NAC, as were younger patient age and better Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. Furthermore, BCS rate was higher in the NAC group in cT2 and cT3tumors (aOR 1.17 and 1.45, respectively; both p < 0.001). In patients with cN+ disease, NAC converted 43.7% to pN0. Less extensive axillary surgery (one to five nodes removed) was more likely in cN+ patients treated with NAC (aOR 1.66; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In hormone receptor-negative breast cancer, chemotherapy was mostly administered adjuvantly, but neoadjuvant use increased over time and was more likely in younger patients and higher T- and N-stage disease. Node-positive patients treated with NAC were less likely to have pathologically positive nodes and more likely to have less extensive axillary surgery.
Authors: Tal Sella; Olga Kantor; Anna Weiss; Ann H Partridge; Otto Metzger; Tari A King Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2022-06-25 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Caterina Calderón; Raquel Hernández; Ana Fernández Montes; Beatriz Castelo; Laura Ciria-Suarez; Mónica Antoñanzas; Jacobo Rogado; Vilma Pacheco-Barcia; Elena Asensio Martínez; Alejandra Ivars; Francisco Ayala de la Peña; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2021-07-13
Authors: Brittany L Murphy; Robert T Fazzio; Tanya L Hoskin; Katrina N Glazebrook; Michael G Keeney; Elizabeth B Habermann; Tina J Hieken Journal: Gland Surg Date: 2018-04