| Literature DB >> 35748681 |
Joar Sivertsen1,2, Tor Hervig1, Geir Strandenes1, Einar K Kristoffersen1,3, Hanne Braathen1, Torunn O Apelseth1,3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Blood products are frequently exposed to room temperature or higher for longer periods than permitted by policy. We aimed to investigate if this resulted in a measurable effect on common quality parameters and viscoelastic hemostatic function of cold stored CPDA-1 whole blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: 450 ml of whole blood from 16 O Rh(D) positive donors was collected in 63 ml of CPDA-1 and stored cold. Eights bags were exposed to five weekly 4-h long transient temperature changes to 28°C. Eight bags were stored continuously at 4°C as a control. Samples were collected at baseline on day 1, after the first cycle on day 1 and weekly before each subsequent cycle (day 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35). Hemolysis, hematological parameters, pH, glucose, lactate, potassium, thromboelastography, INR, APTT, fibrinogen, and factor VIII were measured.Entities:
Keywords: CPDA-1; storage lesion; storage temperature; temperature violations; whole blood
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35748681 PMCID: PMC9541954 DOI: 10.1111/trf.16970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transfusion ISSN: 0041-1132 Impact factor: 3.337
FIGURE 1Cold‐stored CPDA‐1 whole blood was stored for 35 days and exposed to weekly 4‐h temperature increases to 28°C followed by a return to 4°C. a control group was stored continuously at 4°C. baseline samples were collected before cycling on day 1, followed by sampling 1 week after each cycle. An additional sample was taken 4 h after return to cold storage on day 1. Samples were taken from the control group at the same time points
FIGURE 2Hemolysis (A) and platelet count (B) in CPDA‐1 whole blood stored continuously at 4°C (blue) or exposed to weekly 4‐h temperature increases to 28°C (red). Points show mean values with 95% confidence intervals. p‐values show significance for potential differences in change from day 1 to each time point in the test group compared to the control group (linear mixed effects model, R version 4.1.1 with NLME version 3.1–152, the R Foundation for Statistical Computing). * indicates p < .05. Thin lines represent individual blood bags
FIGURE 3Glucose (A), lactate (B), pH (C), and potassium (D) in CPDA‐1 whole blood stored continuously at 4°C (blue) or exposed to weekly 4‐h temperature increases to 28°C (red). Points show mean values with 95% confidence intervals. p‐values show significance for potential differences in change from day 1 to each time point in the test group compared to the control group (linear mixed effects model, R version 4.1.1 with NLME version 3.1–152, the R Foundation for Statistical Computing). * indicates p < .05
FIGURE 4Thromboelastography parameters R (A), K (B), angle (C), and MA (D) in CPDA‐1 whole blood stored continuously at 4°C (blue) or exposed to weekly 4‐h temperature increases to 28°C (red). Points show mean values with 95% confidence intervals. p‐values show significance for potential differences in change from day 1 to each time point in the test group compared to the control group (linear mixed effects model, R version 4.1.1 with NLME version 3.1–152, the R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Thin lines represent individual blood bags. * indicates p < .05
Coagulation parameters in CPDA‐1 whole blood stored continuously at 4°C (control) or exposed to weekly 4‐h temperature increases to 28°C (cycling)
| Before 1st cycle | After 1st cycle | Day 35 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fibrinogen | Control | 2.8 (2.4, 3.2) | 2.8 (2.4, 3.2) | 2.6 (2.3, 3.0) |
| Cycling | 2.8 (2.4, 3.1) | 2.8 (2.4, 3.2) | 2.5 (2.1, 2.9) | |
| Factor VIII | Control | 80 (60, 100) | 77 (57, 97) | 18 (12, 25) |
| Cycling | 78 (58, 97) | 73 (58, 88) | 23 (15, 32) | |
| INR | Control | 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) | 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) | 1.2 (1.1, 1.3) |
| Cycling | 1.1 (1.0, 1.1) | 1.0 (1.0, 1.1) | 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) | |
| APTT | Control | 41 (38, 44) | 41 (37, 44) | 63 (47, 79) |
| Cycling | 39 (36, 41) | 39 (37, 42) | 48 (44, 52) |
Note: Values are means with 95% confidence intervals. There were no statistically significant differences between the control and cycling groups. (Linear mixed effects model, R version 4.1.1 with NLME version 3.1–152, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing).
Significant change from before first cycle (p < .05).