| Literature DB >> 35744682 |
Vanja Vlajkov1, Stefan Anđelić2, Ivana Pajčin1, Mila Grahovac3, Dragana Budakov3, Aleksandar Jokić1, Jovana Grahovac1.
Abstract
One of the leading limiting factors for wider industrial production and commercialization of microbial biopesticides refers to the high costs of cultivation media. The selection of alternative sources of macronutrients crucial for the growth and metabolic activity of the producing microorganism is a necessary phase of the bioprocess development. Gaining a better understanding of the influence of the medium composition on the biotechnological production of biocontrol agents is enabled through bioprocess modelling and optimization. In the present study, after the selection of optimal carbon and nitrogen sources, two modelling approaches were applied to mathematically describe the behavior of the examined bioprocess-the production of biocontrol agents effective against aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus strains. The modelling was performed using four independent variables: cellulose, urea, ammonium sulfate and dipotassium phosphate, and the selected response was the inhibition-zone diameter. After the comparison of the results generated by the Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) approach, the first model was chosen for the further optimization step due to the better fit of the experimental results. As the final investigation step, the optimal cultivation medium composition was defined (g/L): cellulose 5.0, ammonium sulfate 3.77, dipotassium phosphate 0.3, magnesium sulfate heptahydrate 0.3.Entities:
Keywords: ANN; RSM; biocontrol; bioprocess; modelling; optimization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35744682 PMCID: PMC9228200 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10061165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Box-Behnken experimental design = varied values of independent variables.
| Cellulose Content (g/L) | Urea Content (g/L) | (NH4)2SO4 Content (g/L) | K2HPO4 Content (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 35 | 0 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 5 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 35 | 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 0 | 0.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 5 | 0.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 0 | 4.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 5 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
| 35 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
| 5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| 35 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 5 | 0 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 0 | 5 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 5 | 5 | 2.5 |
| 5 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 |
| 35 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 |
| 5 | 2.5 | 5 | 2.5 |
| 35 | 2.5 | 5 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 0 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
| 20 | 5 | 2.5 | 0.5 |
| 20 | 0 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| 20 | 5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 20 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
Normalization ranges of attributes in ANN modelling. All of these ranges were scaled to the range [0, 1].
| Attribute | Normalization Range Values |
|---|---|
| cellulose | 0–50 (g/L) |
| urea | 0–10 (g/L) |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 0–10 (g/L) |
| K2HPO4 | 0–10 (g/L) |
| 10–40 (mm) | |
| 10–40 (mm) |
One-way ANOVA of inhibition-zone diameters obtained by testing antagonistic activity of the cultivation broth samples against the aflatoxigenic isolates in the carbon source selection investigation step.
| Effect | SS | DF | MS | F-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition-zone diameter (mm) | 25,063.71 | 1 | 25,063.71 | 20,243.77 | 0.000000 |
| Carbon source | 70.95 | 6 | 11.83 | 9.55 | 0.000003 |
| Error | 43.33 | 35 | 1.24 |
SS—sum of squares; DF—degree of freedom; MS—mean square.
Mean values of inhibition-zone diameters obtained by testing cultivation broth samples against aflatoxigenic isolates in the carbon source selection investigation step.
| Carbon Source | Inhibition-Zone Diameter (mm) |
|---|---|
| Starch | 22.33333 a |
| Lactose | 23.83333 b |
| Glucose | 23.83333 b |
| Maltose | 24.16667 b |
| Glycerol | 24.33333 b |
| Fructose | 26.16667 c |
| Cellulose | 26.33333 c |
Values marked with the same letter are at the same level of statistical significance.
One-way ANOVA of inhibition-zone diameter obtained by testing antagonistic activity of cultivation broth samples against the aflatoxigenic isolates in the nitrogen source selection investigation step.
| Effect | SS | DF | MS | F-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition-zone diameter (mm) | 23,520.00 | 1 | 23,520.00 | 8204.651 | 0.000000 |
| Nitrogen source | 214.33 | 4 | 53.58 | 18.692 | 0.000000 |
| Error | 71.67 | 25 | 2.87 |
SS—sum of squares; DF—degree of freedom; MS—mean squares.
Mean values of inhibition-zone diameters obtained by testing the cultivation broth samples against the aflatoxigenic isolates in the nitrogen source selection investigation step.
| Nitrogen Source | Inhibition-Zone Diameter (mm) |
|---|---|
| Peptone | 25.00000 a |
| Yeast extract | 25.00000 a |
| Tryptone | 28.16667 b |
| L-glutamic acid | 30.33333 c |
| Urea | 31.50000 c |
Values marked with the same letter are at the same level of statistical significance.
Figure 1Correlation matrix of the experimental values used in the medium composition modeling.
Coefficients of regression equation and their p-values for the diameter of the inhibition zone for Aspergillus flavus SA2BSS as test microorganism.
| Coefficient | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| b0 | 38.98960 | 0.000000 |
| b1 | −0.33876 | 0.000287 |
| b2 | −1.49165 | 0.001542 |
| b3 | −1.59720 | 0.000931 |
| b4 | −3.70852 | 0.000007 |
| b12 | 0.00000 | 0.999989 |
| b13 | 0.00667 | 0.464301 |
| b14 | 0.05278 | 0.000442 |
| b23 | 0.25333 | 0.000443 |
| b24 | −0.01667 | 0.805301 |
| b34 | 0.15000 | 0.042610 |
| b11 | 0.00512 | 0.001688 |
| b22 | 0.17111 | 0.002853 |
| b33 | 0.03111 | 0.510096 |
| b44 | 0.52779 | 0.000009 |
1—cellulose; 2—urea; 3—(NH4)2SO4; 4—K2HPO4.
Coefficients of regression equation and their p-values for the diameter of the inhibition zone for Aspergillus flavus PA2DSS as test microorganism.
| Coefficient | Value | |
|---|---|---|
| b0 | 24.21942 | 0.000000 |
| b1 | −0.10015 | 0.134429 |
| b2 | 0.48611 | 0.179911 |
| b3 | 1.52500 | 0.000769 |
| b4 | 0.23958 | 0.609578 |
| b12 | −0.02000 | 0.031472 |
| b13 | 0.00222 | 0.791376 |
| b14 | 0.02500 | 0.031472 |
| b23 | −0.12000 | 0.031472 |
| b24 | 0.05000 | 0.432879 |
| b34 | −0.25000 | 0.001589 |
| b11 | 0.00414 | 0.004481 |
| b22 | 0.00222 | 0.959338 |
| b33 | −0.10444 | 0.030777 |
| b44 | −0.01736 | 0.799053 |
1—cellulose; 2—urea; 3—(NH4)2SO4; 4—K2HPO4.
ANOVA for the inhibition-zone diameter in the phase of RSM modeling of medium composition using A. flavus SA2BSS as test microorganism.
| Response | SS | DF | MS | F-Value | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition-zone diameter (mm) | 23,139.19 a | 15.00 a | 1542.613 | 3525.972 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
a—model; b—residual. SS—sum of squares; DF—degree of freedom; MS—mean squares; R2—coefficient of determination.
ANOVA for the inhibition-zone diameter in the phase of RSM modeling of medium composition using A. flavus PA2DSS as test microorganism.
| Response | SS | DF | MS | F-Value | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhibition-zone diameter (mm) | 20,035.22 a | 15.00 a | 1335.681 a | 3518.380 | 0.00 | 0.95 |
a—model; b—residual. SS—sum of squares; DF—degree of freedom; MS—mean squares; R2—coefficient of determination.
The autoencoder network training results in ANN modeling.
| Isolate | Metrics | Value |
|---|---|---|
| MSE | 0.0016 | |
| R2 | 0.969 | |
| MSE | 0.0015 | |
| R2 | 0.974 |
MSE—mean squared error; R2—coefficient of determination.
Hyperparameters and results of model training using ANN methodology, with MSE and R2 calculated on the validation set.
| Isolate | Neurons Number | Activation Function | Learning Rate | Learning Rate Degradation | MSE | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | elu | 0.020 | 0.85 | 0.00092 | 0.86 | |
| 10 | elu | 0.035 | 0.70 | 0.00073 | 0.84 |
RSM and ANN models comparison.
| Model | Adjusted Coefficient of Determination (R2adj) |
|---|---|
|
| |
| 0.91 | |
| 0.89 | |
|
| |
| 0.83 | |
| 0.81 |
Optimized values of varied factors and predicted values of inhibition-zone diameters.
|
|
|
|
| Cellulose | minimal | 5.00 |
| Urea | minimal | 0.00 |
| (NH4)2SO4 (g/L) | in range | 3.77 |
| K2HPO4 (g/L) | In range | 0.50 |
|
|
|
|
| Inhibition-zone diameter (mm) | maximal | 3.66 |
| Inhibition-zone diameter (mm) | maximal | 27.84 |