Literature DB >> 12955583

Development, registration and commercialization of microbial pesticides for plant protection.

Emilio Montesinos1.   

Abstract

Plant protection against pathogens, pests and weeds has been progressively reoriented from a therapeutic approach to a rational use of pesticide chemicals in which consumer health and environmental preservation prevail over any other productive or economic considerations. Microbial pesticides are being introduced in this new scenario of crop protection and currently several beneficial microorganisms are the active ingredients of a new generation of microbial pesticides or the basis for many natural products of microbial origin. The development of a microbial pesticide requires several steps addressed to its isolation in pure culture and screening by means of efficacy bioassays performed in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo, or in pilot trials under real conditions of application (field, greenhouse, post-harvest). For the commercial delivery of a microbial pesticide, the biocontrol agent must be produced at an industrial scale (fermentation), preserved for storage and formulated by means of biocompatible additives to increase survival and to improve the application and stability of the final product. Despite the relative high number of patents for biopesticides, only a few of them have materialized in a register for agricultural use. The excessive specificity in most cases and biosafety or environmental concerns in others are major limiting factors. Non-target effects may be possible in particular cases, such as displacement of beneficial microorganisms, allergenicity, toxinogencity (production of secondary metabolites toxic to plants, animals, or humans), pathogenicity (to plants or animals) by the agent itself or due to contaminants, or horizontal gene transfer of these characteristics to non-target microorganisms. However, these non-target effects should not be evaluated in an absolute manner, but relative to chemical control or the absence of any control of the target disease (for example, toxins derived from the pathogen). Consumer concerns about live microbes due to emerging food-borne diseases and bioterrorism do not help to create a socially receptive environment to microbial pesticides. The future of microbial pesticides is not only in developing new active ingredients based on microorganisms beneficial to plants, but in producing self-protected plants (so-called plant-incorporated pesticides) by transforming agronomically high-value crop plants with genes from biological control agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955583     DOI: 10.1007/s10123-003-0144-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Microbiol        ISSN: 1139-6709            Impact factor:   2.479


  28 in total

1.  Agricultural microbial resources: private property or global commons?

Authors:  David Kothamasi; Matthew Spurlock; E Toby Kiers
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  Assessment of the environmental fate of the biological control agent of fire blight, Pseudomonas fluorescens EPS62e, on apple by culture and real-time PCR methods.

Authors:  Marta Pujol; Esther Badosa; Charles Manceau; Emilio Montesinos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Secondary Metabolites Produced by Heterorhabditis Symbionts and Their Application in Agriculture: What We Know and What to Do Next.

Authors:  S Patricia Stock; Ayako Kusakabe; Rousel A Orozco
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.402

4.  Impact of siderophore production by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 22d/93 on epiphytic fitness and biocontrol activity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. glycinea 1a/96.

Authors:  Annette Wensing; Sascha D Braun; Petra Büttner; Dominique Expert; Beate Völksch; Matthias S Ullrich; Helge Weingart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Dispersion, persistence, and stability of the biocontrol agent Penicillium frequentans strain 909 after stone fruit tree applications.

Authors:  Belen Guijarro; Inmaculada Larena; Laura Vilanova; Rosario Torres; Marta Balsells-Llauradó; Neus Teixidó; Paloma Melgarejo; Antonieta De Cal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  2-amino-3-(oxirane-2,3-dicarboxamido)-propanoyl-valine, an effective peptide antibiotic from the epiphyte Pantoea agglomerans 48b/90.

Authors:  Ulrike F Sammer; Beate Völksch; Ute Möllmann; Michaela Schmidtke; Peter Spiteller; Michael Spiteller; Dieter Spiteller
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  Prospects and limitations of microbial pesticides for control of bacterial and fungal pomefruit tree diseases.

Authors:  A Bonaterra; E Badosa; J Cabrefiga; J Francés; E Montesinos
Journal:  Trees (Berl West)       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 2.529

8.  Identification of antifungal principle in the solvent extract of an endophytic fungus Chaetomium globosum from Withania somnifera.

Authors:  Susheel Kumar; Nutan Kaushik; Peter Proksch
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-02-06

Review 9.  Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia solanacearum.

Authors:  Yanetri Asi Nion; Koki Toyota
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Insecticidal and growth inhibitory potential of Streptomyces hydrogenans DH16 on major pest of India, Spodoptera litura (Fab.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Authors:  Talwinder Kaur; Arti Vasudev; Satwinder Kaur Sohal; Rajesh Kumari Manhas
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.