Literature DB >> 35723793

Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: Pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.

Karen J Wernli1, Rebecca E Smith2, Louise M Henderson3, Wenyan Zhao2, Danielle D Durham3, Karen Schifferdecker2, Celia Kaplan4, Diana S M Buist5, Karla Kerlikowske4, Diana L Miglioretti5,6, Tracy Onega7, Nila H Alsheik8, Brian L Sprague9, Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti6, Jill Budesky6, Dianne Johnson6, Anna N A Tosteson2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated self-report of decision quality and regret with breast cancer surgical treatment by pre-operative breast MRI use in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a survey with 957 women aged 18 + with stage 0-III breast cancer identified in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Participants self-reported receipt of pre-operative breast MRI. Primary outcomes were process measures in the Breast Cancer Surgery Decision Quality Instrument (BCS-DQI) (continuous outcome) and Decision Regret Scale (dichotomized outcome as any/none). Generalized estimating equations with linear and logit link were used to estimate adjusted associations between breast MRI and primary outcomes. All analyses were also stratified by breast density.
RESULTS: Survey participation rate was 27.9% (957/3430). Study population was primarily > 60 years, White, college educated, and diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer. Pre-operative breast MRI was reported in 46% of women. A higher proportion of women who were younger age (< 50 years), commercially insured, and self-detected their breast cancer reported pre-operative breast MRI use. In adjusted analysis, pre-operative breast MRI use compared with no use was associated with a small but statistically significantly higher decision quality scores (69.5 vs 64.7, p-value = 0.043). Decision regret did not significantly differ in women who reported pre-operative breast MRI use compared with no use (54.2% v. 48.7%, respectively, p-value = 0.11). Study results did not vary when stratified by breast density for either primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Breast MRI use in the diagnostic work-up of breast cancer does not negatively alter women's perceptions of surgical treatment decisions in early survivorship. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03029286.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCSC; Breast MRI; Breast cancer; Decision quality; Mastectomy; Patient-reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35723793     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06648-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.624


  26 in total

Review 1.  Psychological distress associated with the diagnostic phase for suspected breast cancer: systematic review.

Authors:  Mariann Montgomery; Susan H McCrone
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 2.  Breast MR imaging in assessing extent of disease.

Authors:  Laura Liberman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  The evolving role of MRI in the detection and evaluation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert A Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Julie Weiss; Rebecca A Hubbard; Cristina O'Donoghue; Wendy B DeMartini; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha Goodrich; Beth Virnig; Anna N A Tosteson; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Preoperative breast MRI and mortality in older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  T Onega; W Zhu; J E Weiss; M Goodrich; A N A Tosteson; W DeMartini; B A Virnig; L M Henderson; D S M Buist; K J Wernli; K Kerlikowske; R A Hubbard
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Systematic review of the psychological consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.

Authors:  M Bond; T Pavey; K Welch; C Cooper; R Garside; S Dean; C Hyde
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 7.  A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Gary Freedman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 8.  Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Stefano Ciatto; Petra Macaskill; Sarah J Lord; Ruth M Warren; J Michael Dixon; Les Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Preoperative breast MRI in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Young; Benjamin Kim; Jennifer L Malin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Jessica B Long; Anees B Chagpar; Xiaomei Ma; Pamela R Soulos; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.