Literature DB >> 23942872

Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer.

Brigid K Killelea1, Jessica B Long, Anees B Chagpar, Xiaomei Ma, Pamela R Soulos, Joseph S Ross, Cary P Gross.   

Abstract

While there has been increasing interest in the use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women with breast cancer, little is known about trends in MRI use, or the association of MRI with surgical approach among older women. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, we identified a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2000 to 2009 who underwent surgery. We used Medicare claims to identify preoperative breast MRI and surgical approach. We evaluated temporal trends in MRI use according to age and type of surgery, and identified factors associated with MRI. We assessed the association between MRI and surgical approach: breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy, bilateral versus unilateral mastectomy, and use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Among the 72,461 women in our cohort, 10.1 % underwent breast MRI. Preoperative MRI use increased from 0.8 % in 2000-2001 to 25.2 % in 2008-2009 (p < 0.001). Overall, 43.3 % received mastectomy and 56.7 % received BCS. After adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, MRI was associated with an increased likelihood of having a mastectomy compared to BCS (adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, 95 % CI 1.14-1.28). Among women who underwent mastectomy, MRI was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of having bilateral cancer diagnosed (9.7 %) and undergoing bilateral mastectomy (12.5 %) compared to women without MRI (3.7 and 4.1 %, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, the use of preoperative breast MRI has increased substantially among older women with breast cancer and is associated with an increased likelihood of being diagnosed with bilateral cancer, and more invasive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23942872      PMCID: PMC3893026          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2656-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  41 in total

1.  Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  P P Rosen; S Groshen; D W Kinne; S Hellman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  J H Rowland; K A Desmond; B E Meyerowitz; T R Belin; G E Wyatt; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.

Authors:  M T Mandelson; N Oestreicher; P L Porter; D White; C A Finder; S H Taplin; E White
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.

Authors:  L Lostumbo; N Carbine; J Wallace; J Ezzo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

5.  Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Predictors of significant histologic findings.

Authors:  Katja Goldflam; Kelly K Hunt; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; S Eva Singletary; Nadeem Mirza; Henry M Kuerer; Gildy V Babiera; Frederick C Ames; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Aysegul A Sahin; Banu Arun; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Increased postoperative complications in bilateral mastectomy patients compared to unilateral mastectomy: an analysis of the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Fahima Osman; Fady Saleh; Timothy D Jackson; Mark A Corrigan; Tulin Cil
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer.

Authors:  D Sarrazin; M G Lê; R Arriagada; G Contesso; F Fontaine; M Spielmann; F Rochard; T Le Chevalier; J Lacour
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 6.280

View more
  22 in total

1.  Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Julie Weiss; Rebecca A Hubbard; Cristina O'Donoghue; Wendy B DeMartini; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha Goodrich; Beth Virnig; Anna N A Tosteson; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  Associations of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging with subsequent mastectomy and breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Jessica B Long; Brigid K Killelea; Suzanne B Evans; Kenneth B Roberts; Andrea L Silber; Amy J Davidoff; Tannaz Sedghi; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Relationship between preoperative breast MRI and surgical treatment of non-metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Julie E Weiss; Martha E Goodrich; Weiwei Zhu; Wendy B DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Elissa Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Karen J Wernli; Sally D Herschorn; Elise Hotaling; Cristina O'Donoghue; Rebecca Hubbard
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contralateral Breast Cancer Occurrence Among Older Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Jessica B Long; Brigid K Killelea; Suzanne B Evans; Kenneth B Roberts; Andrea Silber; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Robin M Turner; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Craig E Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Xiao Xu; Nicholas A Christakis; Howard P Forman; James B Yu; Brigid K Killelea; Shi-Yi Wang; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Breast Cancer in the Elderly: Is MRI Helpful?

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Allison Hirsch; Anne Eaton; Michelle Stempel; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.431

8.  Locoregional treatment of breast cancer in women with and without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Julie E Weiss; Tracy Onega; Wendy DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Louise Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Martha Goodrich; Anna N A Tosteson; Beth A Virnig; Cristina O'Donoghue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use by Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Weiwei Zhu; Julie Weiss; Karen J Wernli; Martha E Goodrich; Karla Kerlikowske; Wendy DeMartini; Elissa M Ozanne; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Breast MRI in the Diagnostic and Preoperative Workup Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Julia E Weiss; Diana S M Buist; Anna N A Tosteson; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Martha E Goodrich; Cristina O'Donoghue; Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Beth A Virnig; Caroline S Bennette; Rebecca A Hubbard
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.