Literature DB >> 26511204

Factors Associated with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use among Medicare Beneficiaries with Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer.

Louise M Henderson1, Julie Weiss2, Rebecca A Hubbard3,4, Cristina O'Donoghue5, Wendy B DeMartini6, Diana S M Buist7, Karla Kerlikowske8,9, Martha Goodrich2, Beth Virnig10, Anna N A Tosteson11, Constance D Lehman12, Tracy Onega11.   

Abstract

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use among Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer has substantially increased from 2005 to 2009. We sought to identify factors associated with preoperative breast MRI use among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or stage I-III invasive breast cancer (IBC). Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare data from 2005 to 2009 we identified women ages 66 and older with DCIS or stage I-III IBC who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. We compared preoperative breast MRI use by patient, tumor and hospital characteristics stratified by DCIS and IBC using multivariable logistic regression. From 2005 to 2009, preoperative breast MRI use increased from 5.9% to 22.4% of women diagnosed with DCIS and 7.0% to 24.3% of women diagnosed with IBC. Preoperative breast MRI use was more common among women who were younger, married, lived in higher median income zip codes and had no comorbidities. Among women with IBC, those with lobular disease, smaller tumors (<1 cm) and those with estrogen receptor negative tumors were more likely to receive preoperative breast MRI. Women with DCIS were more likely to receive preoperative MRI if tumors were larger (>2 cm). The likelihood of receiving preoperative breast MRI is similar for women diagnosed with DCIS and IBC. Use of MRI is more common in women with IBC for tumors that are lobular and smaller while for DCIS MRI is used for evaluation of larger lesions.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast magnetic resonance imaging; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive breast cancer; preoperative

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26511204      PMCID: PMC4718842          DOI: 10.1111/tbj.12522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  40 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883.

Authors:  Mitchell D Schnall; Jeffery Blume; David A Bluemke; Gia A Deangelis; Nanette Debruhl; Steven Harms; Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Nola Hylton; Christiane K Kuhl; Etta D Pisano; Petrina Causer; Stuart J Schnitt; Stanley F Smazal; Carol B Stelling; Constance Lehman; Paul T Weatherall; Constantine A Gatsonis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trial.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; David Thickman; David A Bluemke; Etta Pisano; Christiane Kuhl; Thomas B Julian; Nola Hylton; Paul Weatherall; Michael O'loughlin; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Hwang; Dan E Schiller; Pavel Crystal; Ellen Maki; David R McCready
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.

Authors:  K Schelfout; M Van Goethem; E Kersschot; C Colpaert; A M Schelfhout; P Leyman; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; J Van Den Haute; J P Gillardin; W Tjalma; J C Van Der Auwera; P Buytaert; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Association of routine pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Robin M Ciocca; Brian L Egleston; Linda Sesa; Kathryn Evers; Elin R Sigurdson; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Mammographic features of 455 invasive lobular carcinomas.

Authors:  M Le Gal; L Ollivier; B Asselain; M Meunier; M Laurent; P Vielh; S Neuenschwander
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 10.  MRI compared to conventional diagnostic work-up in the detection and evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: a review of existing literature.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Yvonne L Hoogeveen; Johan G Blickman; Carla Boetes
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  5 in total

1.  Preoperative breast MRI and mortality in older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  T Onega; W Zhu; J E Weiss; M Goodrich; A N A Tosteson; W DeMartini; B A Virnig; L M Henderson; D S M Buist; K J Wernli; K Kerlikowske; R A Hubbard
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  The Impact of Preoperative Breast MRI on Surgical Management of Women with Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Diana L Lam; Jacob Smith; Savannah C Partridge; Adrienne Kim; Sara H Javid; Daniel S Hippe; Constance D Lehman; Janie M Lee; Habib Rahbar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: Pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Rebecca E Smith; Louise M Henderson; Wenyan Zhao; Danielle D Durham; Karen Schifferdecker; Celia Kaplan; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Tracy Onega; Nila H Alsheik; Brian L Sprague; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Jill Budesky; Dianne Johnson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.624

4.  Locoregional treatment of breast cancer in women with and without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Elissa M Ozanne; Julie E Weiss; Tracy Onega; Wendy DeMartini; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana S M Buist; Louise Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Martha Goodrich; Anna N A Tosteson; Beth A Virnig; Cristina O'Donoghue
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Use by Breast Density and Family History of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Rebecca A Hubbard; Weiwei Zhu; Julie Weiss; Karen J Wernli; Martha E Goodrich; Karla Kerlikowske; Wendy DeMartini; Elissa M Ozanne; Tracy Onega
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.681

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.