Literature DB >> 22923237

Preoperative breast MRI in early-stage breast cancer.

Patricia Young1, Benjamin Kim, Jennifer L Malin.   

Abstract

Rapid uptake of new imaging technology is a major contributor to rising healthcare costs. Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with early-stage breast cancer has dramatically increased in use without the evidence of improved outcomes compared to standard assessment and is associated with higher rates of mastectomy. A decision analytic model was developed to evaluate the impact of adding breast MRI to the preoperative evaluation of women with early-stage breast cancer who were candidates for breast-conserving therapy on patient outcomes measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Model inputs, including survival, recurrence rates, and health utilities, were obtained from a comprehensive literature review. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed to estimate threshold values for key parameters at which adding MRI would become the optimal imaging strategy over standard assessment. Preoperative MRI resulted in 17.77 QALYs compared to 17.86 QALYs with standard assessment, a decrease of 0.09 QALYs or 34 days. In sensitivity analyses, standard assessment was associated with better patient outcomes than preoperative breast MRI across all plausible probabilities for mastectomy, local recurrence, and health utilities. For routine preoperative breast MRI to become the optimal strategy, the conversion rate to mastectomy after preoperative MRI would need to be <1 % (versus the range of 3.6-33 % reported in the literature). Routine preoperative breast MRI appears to confer no advantage over the standard diagnostic evaluations for early-stage breast cancer and may lead to worse patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22923237     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2207-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

1.  Predictors of preoperative MRI for breast cancer: differences by data source.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Loggers; Hongyuan Gao; Laura S Gold; Larry Kessler; Ruth Etzioni; Diana Sm Buist
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.744

2.  The Impact of Social Contagion on Physician Adoption of Advanced Imaging Tests in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Craig E Pollack; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Xiao Xu; Nicholas A Christakis; Howard P Forman; James B Yu; Brigid K Killelea; Shi-Yi Wang; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: Pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Rebecca E Smith; Louise M Henderson; Wenyan Zhao; Danielle D Durham; Karen Schifferdecker; Celia Kaplan; Diana S M Buist; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Tracy Onega; Nila H Alsheik; Brian L Sprague; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Jill Budesky; Dianne Johnson; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 4.624

4.  Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Jessica B Long; Anees B Chagpar; Xiaomei Ma; Pamela R Soulos; Joseph S Ross; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Breast magnetic resonance imaging and its impact on the surgical treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Georgia Tsina; Philippe Simon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-04-22

6.  Surgeon peer network characteristics and adoption of new imaging techniques in breast cancer: A study of perioperative MRI.

Authors:  Sara S Tannenbaum; Pamela R Soulos; Jeph Herrin; Craig E Pollack; Xiao Xu; Nicholas A Christakis; Howard P Forman; James B Yu; Brigid K Killelea; Shi-Yi Wang; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.