Literature DB >> 35721309

Transfer learning-based approach for automated kidney segmentation on multiparametric MRI sequences.

Rohini Gaikar1, Fatemeh Zabihollahy2, Mohamed W Elfaal3, Azar Azad4, Nicola Schieda5, Eranga Ukwatta1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) is being investigated for kidney cancer because of better soft tissue contrast ability. The necessity of manual labels makes the development of supervised kidney segmentation algorithms challenging for each mp-MRI protocol. Here, we developed a transfer learning-based approach to improve kidney segmentation on a small dataset of five other mp-MRI sequences. Approach: We proposed a fully automated two-dimensional (2D) attention U-Net model for kidney segmentation on T1 weighted-nephrographic phase contrast enhanced (CE)-MRI (T1W-NG) dataset ( N = 108 ). The pretrained weights of T1W-NG kidney segmentation model transferred to five other distinct mp-MRI sequences model (T2W, T1W-in-phase (T1W-IP), T1W-out-of-phase (T1W-OP), T1W precontrast (T1W-PRE), and T1W-corticomedullary-CE (T1W-CM), N = 50 ) and fine-tuned by unfreezing the layers. The individual model performances were evaluated with and without transfer-learning fivefold cross-validation on average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), absolute volume difference, Hausdorff distance (HD), and center-of-mass distance (CD) between algorithm generated and manually segmented kidneys.
Results: The developed 2D attention U-Net model for T1W-NG produced kidney segmentation DSC of 89.34 ± 5.31 % . Compared with randomly initialized weight models, the transfer learning-based models of five mp-MRI sequences showed average increase of 2.96% in DSC of kidney segmentation ( p = 0.001 to 0.006). Specifically, the transfer-learning approach increased average DSC on T2W from 87.19% to 89.90%, T1W-IP from 83.64% to 85.42%, T1W-OP from 79.35% to 83.66%, T1W-PRE from 82.05% to 85.94%, and T1W-CM from 85.65% to 87.64%. Conclusions: We demonstrate that a pretrained model for automated kidney segmentation of one mp-MRI sequence improved automated kidney segmentation on five other additional sequences.
© 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  CNN models; kidney segmentation; multiparametric MRI; transfer learning

Year:  2022        PMID: 35721309      PMCID: PMC9201619          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.9.3.036001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  17 in total

1.  Automated classification of solid renal masses on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images using convolutional neural network with decision fusion.

Authors:  Fatemeh Zabihollahy; Nicola Schieda; Satheesh Krishna; Eranga Ukwatta
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  AUTOMATIC RENAL SEGMENTATION IN DCE-MRI USING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS.

Authors:  Marzieh Haghighi; Simon K Warfield; Sila Kurugol
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2018-05-24

3.  UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Zongwei Zhou; Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee; Nima Tajbakhsh; Jianming Liang
Journal:  Deep Learn Med Image Anal Multimodal Learn Clin Decis Support (2018)       Date:  2018-09-20

4.  Role of Virtual Biopsy in the Management of Renal Masses.

Authors:  Alberto Diaz de Leon; Matthew S Davenport; Stuart G Silverman; Nicola Schieda; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Identify Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in cT1a Renal Masses.

Authors:  Noah E Canvasser; Fernando U Kay; Yin Xi; Daniella F Pinho; Daniel Costa; Alberto Diaz de Leon; Gaurav Khatri; John R Leyendecker; Takeshi Yokoo; Aaron Lay; Nicholas Kavoussi; Ersin Koseoglu; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Cancer statistics, 2022.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Hannah E Fuchs; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses.

Authors:  Alessandro Volpe; Tony Panzarella; Ricardo A Rendon; Masoom A Haider; Filippos I Kondylis; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Semiautomatic segmentation of the kidney in magnetic resonance images using unimodal thresholding.

Authors:  Martin Sandmair; Matthias Hammon; Hannes Seuss; Ragnar Theis; Michael Uder; Rolf Janka
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-11-17

9.  The state of the art in kidney and kidney tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced CT imaging: Results of the KiTS19 challenge.

Authors:  Nicholas Heller; Fabian Isensee; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Xiaoshuai Hou; Chunmei Xie; Fengyi Li; Yang Nan; Guangrui Mu; Zhiyong Lin; Miofei Han; Guang Yao; Yaozong Gao; Yao Zhang; Yixin Wang; Feng Hou; Jiawei Yang; Guangwei Xiong; Jiang Tian; Cheng Zhong; Jun Ma; Jack Rickman; Joshua Dean; Bethany Stai; Resha Tejpaul; Makinna Oestreich; Paul Blake; Heather Kaluzniak; Shaneabbas Raza; Joel Rosenberg; Keenan Moore; Edward Walczak; Zachary Rengel; Zach Edgerton; Ranveer Vasdev; Matthew Peterson; Sean McSweeney; Sarah Peterson; Arveen Kalapara; Niranjan Sathianathen; Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos; Christopher Weight
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 8.545

10.  A comparison between two semantic deep learning frameworks for the autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease segmentation based on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Vitoantonio Bevilacqua; Antonio Brunetti; Giacomo Donato Cascarano; Andrea Guerriero; Francesco Pesce; Marco Moschetta; Loreto Gesualdo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.