Literature DB >> 33049579

The state of the art in kidney and kidney tumor segmentation in contrast-enhanced CT imaging: Results of the KiTS19 challenge.

Nicholas Heller1, Fabian Isensee2, Klaus H Maier-Hein3, Xiaoshuai Hou4, Chunmei Xie4, Fengyi Li4, Yang Nan4, Guangrui Mu5, Zhiyong Lin6, Miofei Han7, Guang Yao7, Yaozong Gao7, Yao Zhang8, Yixin Wang8, Feng Hou8, Jiawei Yang9, Guangwei Xiong9, Jiang Tian10, Cheng Zhong10, Jun Ma11, Jack Rickman12, Joshua Dean12, Bethany Stai12, Resha Tejpaul12, Makinna Oestreich12, Paul Blake12, Heather Kaluzniak13, Shaneabbas Raza13, Joel Rosenberg12, Keenan Moore14, Edward Walczak12, Zachary Rengel12, Zach Edgerton12, Ranveer Vasdev12, Matthew Peterson12, Sean McSweeney12, Sarah Peterson15, Arveen Kalapara16, Niranjan Sathianathen16, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos12, Christopher Weight12.   

Abstract

There is a large body of literature linking anatomic and geometric characteristics of kidney tumors to perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Semantic segmentation of these tumors and their host kidneys is a promising tool for quantitatively characterizing these lesions, but its adoption is limited due to the manual effort required to produce high-quality 3D segmentations of these structures. Recently, methods based on deep learning have shown excellent results in automatic 3D segmentation, but they require large datasets for training, and there remains little consensus on which methods perform best. The 2019 Kidney and Kidney Tumor Segmentation challenge (KiTS19) was a competition held in conjunction with the 2019 International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) which sought to address these issues and stimulate progress on this automatic segmentation problem. A training set of 210 cross sectional CT images with kidney tumors was publicly released with corresponding semantic segmentation masks. 106 teams from five continents used this data to develop automated systems to predict the true segmentation masks on a test set of 90 CT images for which the corresponding ground truth segmentations were kept private. These predictions were scored and ranked according to their average Sørensen-Dice coefficient between the kidney and tumor across all 90 cases. The winning team achieved a Dice of 0.974 for kidney and 0.851 for tumor, approaching the inter-annotator performance on kidney (0.983) but falling short on tumor (0.923). This challenge has now entered an "open leaderboard" phase where it serves as a challenging benchmark in 3D semantic segmentation.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Kidney tumor; Semantic segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33049579      PMCID: PMC7734203          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  23 in total

1.  Multi-Organ Segmentation Over Partially Labeled Datasets With Multi-Scale Feature Abstraction.

Authors:  Xi Fang; Pingkun Yan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Automated segmentation of kidney and renal mass and automated detection of renal mass in CT urography using 3D U-Net-based deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Zhiyong Lin; Yingpu Cui; Jia Liu; Zhaonan Sun; Shuai Ma; Xiaodong Zhang; Xiaoying Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Improving segmentation and classification of renal tumors in small sample 3D CT images using transfer learning with convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Xi-Liang Zhu; Hong-Bin Shen; Haitao Sun; Li-Xia Duan; Ying-Ying Xu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Kidney Tumor Segmentation Based on FR2PAttU-Net Model.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Zengnan Mo; Fangrong Hu; Fang Liu; Taiping Mo; Yewei Zhang; Zhencheng Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Exploiting Shared Knowledge From Non-COVID Lesions for Annotation-Efficient COVID-19 CT Lung Infection Segmentation.

Authors:  Yichi Zhang; Qingcheng Liao; Lin Yuan; He Zhu; Jiezhen Xing; Jicong Zhang
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 5.772

6.  Optimizing prediction of new-baseline glomerular filtration rate after radical nephrectomy: are algorithms really necessary?

Authors:  Nityam Rathi; Yosuke Yasuda; Worapat Attawettayanon; Diego A Palacios; Yunlin Ye; Jianbo Li; Christopher Weight; Mohammed Eltemamy; Tarik Benidir; Robert Abouassaly; Steven C Campbell
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  A deep-learning approach for direct whole-heart mesh reconstruction.

Authors:  Fanwei Kong; Nathan Wilson; Shawn Shadden
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 13.828

8.  Transfer learning-based approach for automated kidney segmentation on multiparametric MRI sequences.

Authors:  Rohini Gaikar; Fatemeh Zabihollahy; Mohamed W Elfaal; Azar Azad; Nicola Schieda; Eranga Ukwatta
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-06-16

9.  LLRHNet: Multiple Lesions Segmentation Using Local-Long Range Features.

Authors:  Liangliang Liu; Ying Wang; Jing Chang; Pei Zhang; Gongbo Liang; Hui Zhang
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Workflow for automatic renal perfusion quantification using ASL-MRI and machine learning.

Authors:  Isabell K Bones; Clemens Bos; Chrit Moonen; Jeroen Hendrikse; Marijn van Stralen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 3.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.