Literature DB >> 14770429

The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses.

Alessandro Volpe1, Tony Panzarella, Ricardo A Rendon, Masoom A Haider, Filippos I Kondylis, Michael A S Jewett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing, largely due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. Most renal tumors are detected incidentally as small, asymptomatic masses. To study their natural history, the authors prospectively followed a series of patients with this type of lesion who were unsuited for or refused surgery.
METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with 32 masses that measured < 4 cm in greatest dimension (25 solid masses and 7 complex cystic masses) were studied. The primary outcome was tumor size, which was calculated as volume over time. All patients were followed with serial abdominal imaging, and each mass had at least three follow-up measurements. The median follow-up was 27.9 months (range, 5.3-143.0 months).
RESULTS: Overall, the average growth rate did not differ statistically from zero growth (P = 0.09; 95% confidence interval, - 0.005-0.2 cm per year) and was not associated with either initial size (P = 0.28) or mass type (P = 0.41). Seven masses (22%) reached 4 cm in greatest dimension after 12-85 months of follow-up. Eight masses (25%) doubled their volumes within 12 months. Overall, 11 masses (34%) fulfilled 1 of these 2 criteria of rapid growth. Nine tumors were removed surgically after an average of 3.1 years of follow-up because it was believed that they were growing fast. No patient had disease progression.
CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of small renal masses that are presumed RCCs grow if they are managed conservatively and are followed with serial imaging. The growth rate is slow or undetectable in the majority of patients. These observations raise the possibility of a period of initial observation in selected patients, particularly the elderly or infirm. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14770429     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  104 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation and management of small renal masses: looking beyond the tumor margin.

Authors:  Michael Garcia-Roig; Michael A Gorin; Merce Jorda
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Renal mass biopsy to guide treatment decisions for small incidental renal tumors: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Pari V Pandharipande; Debra A Gervais; Rebecca I Hartman; Mukesh G Harisinghani; Adam S Feldman; Peter R Mueller; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Active Surveillance for Small Renal Masses: A Review of the Aims and Preliminary Results of the DISSRM Registry.

Authors:  Matthew R Danzig; Peter Chang; Andrew A Wagner; Mohamad E Allaf; James M McKiernan; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Comparison of Hilar Clamping Techniques in Partial Nephrectomy: Is Artery Only Clamping Beneficial?

Authors:  Kil-Hun Song; Wol-Song Jang
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-04-11

5.  Clinical evaluation and technical features of three-dimensional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with selective segmental artery clamping.

Authors:  Yuan Ruan; Xiao-Hai Wang; Kui Wang; Yu-Yang Zhao; Shu-Jie Xia; Dong-Liang Xu
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  MR classification of renal masses with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Ivan Pedrosa; Mary T Chou; Long Ngo; Ronaldo H Baroni; Elizabeth M Genega; Laura Galaburda; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dual-energy CT iodine overlay technique for characterization of renal masses as cyst or solid: a phantom feasibility study.

Authors:  C L Brown; R P Hartman; O P Dzyubak; N Takahashi; A Kawashima; C H McCollough; M R Bruesewitz; A M Primak; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Imaging of Solid Renal Masses.

Authors:  Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass : a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Impact of the length of time between diagnosis and surgical removal of urologic neoplasms on survival.

Authors:  Vincent Bourgade; Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Jerôme Parra; Marc-Olivier Bitker; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.