Literature DB >> 30068491

The Revised 2017 MSPE: Better, But Not "Outstanding".

Lauren Hook1, Aitua C Salami1, Tenesha Diaz1, Kara E Friend1, Alisan Fathalizadeh1, Amit R T Joshi2.   

Abstract

AIM: The medical student performance evaluation (MSPE) is relied on as an objective summary evaluation by surgical program directors. In 2017, an MSPE task force released recommendations for best practice for their format and content. The purpose of this study was to analyze US medical schools' adherence to these guidelines.
METHODS: MSPEs from 113 of 147 Liaison committee on Medical Education (LCME)-accredited medical schools were analyzed for measurable attributes such as word counts, transparent clerkship grading, comparative performance data, and statements of professionalism. 2017 MSPEs were compared to a baseline group of 45 MSPEs from 2016 to measure change over time. Measurable attributes were compared using the Fisher exact and Mann Whitney-U tests. A p value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
RESULTS: We analyzed 113 MSPEs from 2017. The median page count decreased by one from the prior year, with a narrower range of variation. 96% of schools reported a discreet grade in surgery. We observed substantial compliance with the recommendation for a statement of professionalism, noteworthy characteristics, and comparative clerkship data. More schools were observed to report school-wide rankings. There were significant variations in the graphical depiction of student achievement.
CONCLUSIONS: In response to the 2017 task force guidelines, MSPEs have become more standardized and transparent with regard to medical student evaluation. There is increased (but not ubiquitous) adherence with the recommendation for three noteworthy characteristics and statements of professionalism. Of particular importance to surgical program directors, 95.6% of 2017 MSPEs report a grade in the surgical clerkship and 85.8% include school-wide comparative clerkship performance data. Still, only 69.9% currently report school-wide summative performance data.
Copyright © 2018 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Dean's Letter; Interpersonal and Communication Skills; MSPE; MSPE Task Force; Professionalism; Surgery Residency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30068491     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  10 in total

1.  Medical Student Performance Evaluation (MSPE) 2017 Task Force Recommendations as Reflected in the Format of 2018 MSPE.

Authors:  Daniel Giang
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

2.  Just a Game: the Dangers of Quantifying Medical Student Professionalism.

Authors:  Roshini Pinto-Powell; Timothy Lahey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Clerkship Grading and the U.S. Economy: What Medical Education Can Learn From America's Economic History.

Authors:  Michael S Ryan; E Marshall Brooks; Komal Safdar; Sally A Santen
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Current State of the Medical Student Performance Evaluation: A Tool for Reflection for Residency Programs.

Authors:  Judith M Brenner; Jeffrey B Bird; Jason Brenner; David Orner; Karen Friedman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-13

5.  A Retrospective Analysis of Medical Student Performance Evaluations, 2014-2020: Recommend with Reservations.

Authors:  Rebecca L Tisdale; Amy R Filsoof; Surbhi Singhal; Wendy Cáceres; Shriram Nallamshetty; Angela J Rogers; Abraham C Verghese; Robert A Harrington; Ronald M Witteles
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.473

6.  The Revised Medical School Performance Evaluation: Does It Meet the Needs of Its Readers?

Authors:  Judith M Brenner; Thurayya Arayssi; Rosemarie L Conigliaro; Karen Friedman
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

7.  Medical School to Residency: How Can We Trust the Process?

Authors:  Gary L Beck Dallaghan; Irene Alexandraki; Jennifer Christner; Meg Keeley; Sorabh Khandelwal; Beat Steiner; Paul A Hemmer
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-14

8.  The Discouraging Inadequacy of Clerkship Grades to Evaluate Medical Students-Are We Ready for Solutions?

Authors:  Amit R T Joshi; Jennifer Choi; Kyla Terhune
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-04

9.  Prioritizing the Interview in Selecting Resident Applicants: Behavioral Interviews to Determine Goodness of Fit.

Authors:  Michael B Prystowsky; Evan Cadoff; Yungtai Lo; Tiffany M Hebert; Jacob J Steinberg
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2021-10-25

10.  Compliance with CDIM-APDIM Guidelines for Department of Medicine Letters: an Opportunity to Improve Communication Across the Continuum.

Authors:  Allison H Ferris; Anne G Pereira; Steven V Angus; Richard I Kopelman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 5.128

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.