Literature DB >> 35705062

Experimental validation of proton physics models of Geant4 for calculating stopping power ratio.

Ruirui Liu1, Xiandong Zhao2, Maria Medrano3.   

Abstract

In this work, we conducted experiments to validate the proton physics models of Geant4 (version 10.6). The stopping power ratios (SPRs) of 11 inserts, such as acrylic, delrin, high density polyethylene, and polytetrafluoroethylene, etc, were measured using a superconducting synchrocyclotron that produces a scattering proton beam. The SPRs of the inserts were also calculated based on Geant4 simulation with six physics lists, i.e. QGSP_ FTFP_ BERT, QGSP_BIC_HP, QGSP_BIC, QGSP_FTFP_BERT, QSGP_BERT, and QBBC. The calculated SPRs were compared to the experimental SPRs, and relative per cent error was used to quantify the accuracy of the simulated SPRs of inserts. The comparison showed that the five physics lists generally agree well with the experimental SPRs with a relative difference of less than 1%. The lowest overall percentage error was observed for QGSP_FTFP_BERT and the highest overall percentage error was observed for QGSP_BIC_HP. The 0.1 mm range cut value consistently led to higher percentage error for all physics lists except for QGSP_BIC_HP and QBBC. Based on the validation, we recommend QGSP_BERT_HP physics list for proton dose calculation.
© 2022 Society for Radiological Protection. Published on behalf of SRP by IOP Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Geant4; Monte Carlo simulation; experimental validation; physics lists; stopping power ratio

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35705062      PMCID: PMC9462414          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ac7918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.559


  21 in total

1.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  Vision 20/20: proton therapy.

Authors:  Alfred R Smith
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Geant4 hadronic physics for space radiation environment.

Authors:  Anton V Ivantchenko; Vladimir N Ivanchenko; Jose-Manuel Quesada Molina; Sebastien L Incerti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Simulation of proton range monitoring in an anthropomorphic phantom using multi-slat collimators and time-of-flight detection of prompt-gamma quanta.

Authors:  Patricia Cambraia Lopes; Paulo Crespo; Hugo Simões; Rui Ferreira Marques; Katia Parodi; Dennis R Schaart
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  TOPAS: an innovative proton Monte Carlo platform for research and clinical applications.

Authors:  J Perl; J Shin; J Schumann; B Faddegon; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Proton radiation therapy for lung cancer: is there enough evidence?

Authors:  David A Bush
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Hippocampal sparing radiotherapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: impact of treatment margins and treatment technique.

Authors:  N Patrik Brodin; Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Malin Blomstrand; Anne Kiil-Berthlesen; Christian Hollensen; Ivan R Vogelius; Birgitta Lannering; Søren M Bentzen; Thomas Björk-Eriksson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.

Authors:  M Testa; J Schümann; H-M Lu; J Shin; B Faddegon; J Perl; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Carbon fragmentation measurements and validation of the Geant4 nuclear reaction models for hadrontherapy.

Authors:  M De Napoli; C Agodi; G Battistoni; A A Blancato; G A P Cirrone; G Cuttone; F Giacoppo; M C Morone; D Nicolosi; L Pandola; V Patera; G Raciti; E Rapisarda; F Romano; D Sardina; A Sarti; A Sciubba; V Scuderi; C Sfienti; S Tropea
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Evaluation of electromagnetic and nuclear scattering models in GATE/Geant4 for proton therapy.

Authors:  Andreas F Resch; Alessio Elia; Hermann Fuchs; Antonio Carlino; Hugo Palmans; Markus Stock; Dietmar Georg; Loïc Grevillot
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.