Literature DB >> 35705013

The need for a standard for informed consent for collection of human fetal material.

Roger A Barker1, Gerard J Boer2, Elena Cattaneo3, R Alta Charo4, Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes5, Yali Cong6, Misao Fujita7, Steven Goldman8, Göran Hermerén9, Insoo Hyun10, Steven Lisgo11, Anne E Rosser12, Eric Anthony13, Olle Lindvall9.   

Abstract

The ISSCR has developed the Informed Consent Standards for Human Fetal Tissue Donation and Research to promote uniformity and transparency in tissue donation and collection. This standard is designed to assist those working with and overseeing the regulation of such tissue and reassure the wider community and public.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35705013      PMCID: PMC9214061          DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cell Reports        ISSN: 2213-6711            Impact factor:   7.294


Main text

The research collection of human fetal material from the termination of pregnancies involves complex ethical and logistical issues, and the processes for doing this vary widely from country to country. As a result, tissue collected at one site may not be allowed to be used at another that operates under a different regulatory framework and ethical perspectives. In order to address such issues and to ensure that this vital source of material can be used to the maximum benefit of basic and clinical science and therapeutics, the ISSCR convened a taskforce of relevant experts to draft a common informed-consent standard for the donation of human fetal tissue (https://www.isscr.org/docs/default-source/policy-documents/isscr_informedconsentstandardforhumanfetaltissuedonationforresearch__4-20-22_final.pdf). Human fetal material has proven a vital source of tissue for many different areas of research over the last 30–40 years. Research using such tissue has expanded of late as the technologies for analyzing tissue at the single-cell level with spatial transcriptomics and proteomics have opened up new ways of understanding normal human development (Haniffa et al., 2021; Park et al., 2020; Bocchi et al., 2021) as well as the origin of certain cancers (Young et al., 2021; Kildisiute et al., 2021) and developmental/congenital abnormalities (Samad and Wu, 2021). In addition, the translation of stem cell interventions to first-in-human trials has meant that there is a need, in some cases, to assess the fidelity of that stem cell product against its developmental equivalent (Grealish et al., 2014). The request for human fetal material collected through termination of pregnancies is rising at a time when the ability to collect fetal tissue is becoming more challenging, as such procedures are increasingly being moved into the community through medical, rather than surgical, approaches. This has created a need to better harmonize the consent for the collection and distribution of this tissue while being cognizant of the different ethical and regulatory frameworks that exist in different countries. Human fetal material has unique properties that cannot be replicated using other tissue sources. Recently, work has shown that certain populations of cells found in the normal developing human fetus are simply not seen in rodent models of development (Park et al., 2020; La Manno et al., 2016), and thus without the study of such tissue, important cell types and developmental pathways would be missed. Furthermore, this tissue has been used to understand diseases that preferentially target developing human tissues such as the Zika virus (Retallack et al., 2016). Finally, this tissue has been used for proof-of-principle trials, for example, in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) in whom fetal midbrain tissue implants were used, with some successes, to replace lost midbrain dopamine neurons (Bjorklund and Lindvall, 2017). In this new ISSCR document, we have sought to establish an international standard for informed consent that will promote uniformity and transparency in tissue donation and collection. Such a standard should serve to assist those working with the tissue and those overseeing the regulation of the use of such tissue as well as reassure the wider community and public. The standard covers what was deemed to be the major areas of this consenting process but should be viewed in the context of national laws and guidelines that already exist for such donations. The areas laid out in the standard cannot cover all eventualities and the type of research using human fetal tissue, as this has its own guidelines and is not strictly relevant to the consenting process itself. Nevertheless, a necessary part of the information shared with the donating women is the need to know what potential uses may be made of the tissue so donated. The key issues that should be covered include: The separation of the consent for termination of pregnancy from consent for the potential use of the fetal material, such that the latter consent should only be sought after the consent for the termination of the pregnancy has been obtained. This is to ensure that the women terminating the pregnancy does so without any sense of coercion or encouragement to proceed, knowing she is donating the tissue for some research/therapeutic purpose. Indeed, it is critical that the donating woman understands that the termination and potential use of the tissue are separate consents and that both are done in a voluntary fashion and that either consent can be withdrawn at any time up to the point of tissue collection. Such a decision will not impact on their medical care, nor does it mean that giving consent for the donation of tissue changes in any way the standard of medical care they will receive. The decision to donate tissue does bring with it, in some instances, additional tests, which need discussing with the donor woman, as some of these may have implications for them. For example, additional blood tests to look for certain infections may reveal that the donating woman has an infection she was unaware of and that this has important consequences to them and others (e.g., HIV infection, syphilis, and so on). Given this, a clear process for dealing with such rare results needs to be established in any fetal-tissue donation program. Potential use of the tissue is an important area to be discussed. Although a complete list of uses for any tissue is not possible, given how techniques and questions evolve in clinical science, the list of ongoing work and likely new work should be discussed. The level of detail may vary, but it should at the very least describe what is being done with the tissue and why, how the research is funded, and what potential benefits may arise from the work as well as how the research project has been reviewed and approved. In addition, any conflicts of interest (both financial and research) should also be declared to ensure that the work is being done in a transparent way. This is particularly relevant when the tissue is being used for the development of potential commercial products. Also, issues around confidentiality of the donor need to be covered as well as what will ultimately happen to the tissue in terms of storage and/or disposal. Finally, at the end of the consenting procedure, there should be an opportunity, including, if needed, an adequate but realistic time period (e.g., a few days) for the woman donating the tissue to ask any questions of the team obtaining the consent and/or providing links/names of those who may be able to provide more information on particular aspects of the fetal-tissue research. However, it should be stressed that ideally (and in some countries, this is covered by regulation) those collecting the consent for the tissue are not the same people as those who will be undertaking research with it so as to ensure there are no perceived conflicts of interest and/or coercion. In conclusion, this new standard has been developed to help all working in this area of research with the hope that it will facilitate such work with this important tissue source. This standard is not seeking to offer an opinion on the ethical and legal rights of termination of pregnancy or fetal-tissue research, which are covered in other guideline documents from the ISSCR (https://www.isscr.org/policy/guidelines-for-stem-cell-research-and-clinical-translation).
  10 in total

1.  Zika virus cell tropism in the developing human brain and inhibition by azithromycin.

Authors:  Hanna Retallack; Elizabeth Di Lullo; Carolina Arias; Kristeene A Knopp; Matthew T Laurie; Carmen Sandoval-Espinosa; Walter R Mancia Leon; Robert Krencik; Erik M Ullian; Julien Spatazza; Alex A Pollen; Caleigh Mandel-Brehm; Tomasz J Nowakowski; Arnold R Kriegstein; Joseph L DeRisi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A roadmap for the Human Developmental Cell Atlas.

Authors:  Muzlifah Haniffa; Deanne Taylor; Sten Linnarsson; Bruce J Aronow; Gary D Bader; Roger A Barker; Pablo G Camara; J Gray Camp; Alain Chédotal; Andrew Copp; Heather C Etchevers; Paolo Giacobini; Berthold Göttgens; Guoji Guo; Ania Hupalowska; Kylie R James; Emily Kirby; Arnold Kriegstein; Joakim Lundeberg; John C Marioni; Kerstin B Meyer; Kathy K Niakan; Mats Nilsson; Bayanne Olabi; Dana Pe'er; Aviv Regev; Jennifer Rood; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Rahul Satija; Sarah A Teichmann; Barbara Treutlein; Roser Vento-Tormo; Simone Webb
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 69.504

3.  A cell atlas of human thymic development defines T cell repertoire formation.

Authors:  Jong-Eun Park; Rachel A Botting; Cecilia Domínguez Conde; Dorin-Mirel Popescu; Marieke Lavaert; Daniel J Kunz; Issac Goh; Emily Stephenson; Roberta Ragazzini; Elizabeth Tuck; Anna Wilbrey-Clark; Kenny Roberts; Veronika R Kedlian; John R Ferdinand; Xiaoling He; Simone Webb; Daniel Maunder; Niels Vandamme; Krishnaa T Mahbubani; Krzysztof Polanski; Lira Mamanova; Liam Bolt; David Crossland; Fabrizio de Rita; Andrew Fuller; Andrew Filby; Gary Reynolds; David Dixon; Kourosh Saeb-Parsy; Steven Lisgo; Deborah Henderson; Roser Vento-Tormo; Omer A Bayraktar; Roger A Barker; Kerstin B Meyer; Yvan Saeys; Paola Bonfanti; Sam Behjati; Menna R Clatworthy; Tom Taghon; Muzlifah Haniffa; Sarah A Teichmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The coding and long noncoding single-cell atlas of the developing human fetal striatum.

Authors:  Vittoria Dickinson Bocchi; Paola Conforti; Elena Vezzoli; Dario Besusso; Claudio Cappadona; Tiziana Lischetti; Maura Galimberti; Valeria Ranzani; Raoul J P Bonnal; Marco De Simone; Grazisa Rossetti; Xiaoling He; Kenji Kamimoto; Ira Espuny-Camacho; Andrea Faedo; Federica Gervasoni; Romina Vuono; Samantha A Morris; Jian Chen; Dan Felsenfeld; Giulio Pavesi; Roger A Barker; Massimiliano Pagani; Elena Cattaneo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Single cell RNA sequencing approaches to cardiac development and congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Tahmina Samad; Sean M Wu
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 7.499

6.  Human ESC-derived dopamine neurons show similar preclinical efficacy and potency to fetal neurons when grafted in a rat model of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Shane Grealish; Elsa Diguet; Agnete Kirkeby; Bengt Mattsson; Andreas Heuer; Yann Bramoulle; Nadja Van Camp; Anselme L Perrier; Philippe Hantraye; Anders Björklund; Malin Parmar
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 24.633

7.  Molecular Diversity of Midbrain Development in Mouse, Human, and Stem Cells.

Authors:  Gioele La Manno; Daniel Gyllborg; Simone Codeluppi; Kaneyasu Nishimura; Carmen Salto; Amit Zeisel; Lars E Borm; Simon R W Stott; Enrique M Toledo; J Carlos Villaescusa; Peter Lönnerberg; Jesper Ryge; Roger A Barker; Ernest Arenas; Sten Linnarsson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Tumor to normal single-cell mRNA comparisons reveal a pan-neuroblastoma cancer cell.

Authors:  Gerda Kildisiute; Waleed M Kholosy; Matthew D Young; Kenny Roberts; Rasa Elmentaite; Sander R van Hooff; Clarissa N Pacyna; Eleonora Khabirova; Alice Piapi; Christine Thevanesan; Eva Bugallo-Blanco; Christina Burke; Lira Mamanova; Kaylee M Keller; Karin P S Langenberg-Ververgaert; Philip Lijnzaad; Thanasis Margaritis; Frank C P Holstege; Michelle L Tas; Marc H W A Wijnen; Max M van Noesel; Ignacio Del Valle; Giuseppe Barone; Reinier van der Linden; Catriona Duncan; John Anderson; John C Achermann; Muzlifah Haniffa; Sarah A Teichmann; Dyanne Rampling; Neil J Sebire; Xiaoling He; Ronald R de Krijger; Roger A Barker; Kerstin B Meyer; Omer Bayraktar; Karin Straathof; Jan J Molenaar; Sam Behjati
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Replacing Dopamine Neurons in Parkinson's Disease: How did it happen?

Authors:  Anders Björklund; Olle Lindvall
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Single cell derived mRNA signals across human kidney tumors.

Authors:  Matthew D Young; Thomas J Mitchell; Lars Custers; Thanasis Margaritis; Francisco Morales-Rodriguez; Kwasi Kwakwa; Eleonora Khabirova; Gerda Kildisiute; Thomas R W Oliver; Ronald R de Krijger; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Federico Comitani; Alice Piapi; Eva Bugallo-Blanco; Christine Thevanesan; Christina Burke; Elena Prigmore; Kirsty Ambridge; Kenny Roberts; Felipe A Vieira Braga; Tim H H Coorens; Ignacio Del Valle; Anna Wilbrey-Clark; Lira Mamanova; Grant D Stewart; Vincent J Gnanapragasam; Dyanne Rampling; Neil Sebire; Nicholas Coleman; Liz Hook; Anne Warren; Muzlifah Haniffa; Marcel Kool; Stefan M Pfister; John C Achermann; Xiaoling He; Roger A Barker; Adam Shlien; Omer A Bayraktar; Sarah A Teichmann; Frank C Holstege; Kerstin B Meyer; Jarno Drost; Karin Straathof; Sam Behjati
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.