| Literature DB >> 35701803 |
Dong-Ho Kang1, Sanghoon Lee1, Ho-Joong Kim2, Sang-Min Park1, Jin S Yeom1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed (1) to clarify difference in the natural history of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with respect to surgical treatment according to severity of stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using qualitative grading system and (2) to estimate surgical probabilities depending on radiological severity.Entities:
Keywords: Lumbar spinal stenosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Natural history; Qualitative grading; Surgical decision
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35701803 PMCID: PMC9195331 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05510-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.562
Fig. 1Flowchart of subject recruitment. LSS, lumbar spinal stenosis; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging
The qualitative grading systems of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI
| Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central lesion (Lee et al. 2011) [ | No stenosis | Mild stenosis with clear separation of each cauda equine | Moderate stenosis with some cauda equina aggregation | Severe stenosis with the entire cauda equina as a bundle |
| Foraminal lesion (Lee et al. 2010) [ | Normal | Perineural fat obliteration in the two opposing directions | Perineural fat obliteration in the four directions | Nerve root collapse or morphologic change |
Fig. 2The number of surgical and conservative patients according to the grade of maximal central stenosis on MRI. There was significant difference in the ratio of surgical patients according to the grade of maximal central stenosis except between grades 1 and 2
Fig. 3The number of surgical and conservative patients according to the grade of maximal foraminal stenosis on MRI. There was significant difference in the ratio of surgical patients according to the grade of maximal foraminal stenosis except between grades 0 and 1, and between grades 2 and 3
Percentage of surgical patients according to combination of grades of maximal central and foraminal stenoses
| Grade of maximal central stenosis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| Grade of maximal foraminal stenosis | 0 | 7.5% | 22.5% | 30.6% | 61.0% | < 0.001 |
| 1 | 11.4% | 28.3% | 39.6% | 59.1% | < 0.001 | |
| 2 | 44.3% | 45.0% | 22.2% | 62.3% | 0.084 | |
| 3 | 46.8% | 33.3% | 41.7% | 57.9% | 0.122 | |
| < 0.001 | 0.110 | 0.395 | 0.738 | |||
alinear-by-linear association test was used
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of risk factors of surgical treatment
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds ratio (95% CI) | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |||
| Age (years) | 1.03(1.02–1.04) | 0.197 | ||
| Sex (male) | 0.99 (0.78–1.27) | 0.959 | ||
| Maximum grade of central stenosis | ||||
| Grade 1a | 1.79 (1.19–2.69) | 1.79 (1.18–2.71) | ||
| Grade 2a | 2.34 (1.62–3.37) | 2.21 (1.52–3.20) | ||
| Grade 3a | 6.74 (4.95–9.17) | 6.26 (4.59–8.56) | ||
| Maximum grade of foraminal stenosis | ||||
| Grade 1a | 1.31 (0.96–1.77) | 0.085 | 1.25 (0.91–1.73) | 0.174 |
| Grade 2a | 2.47 (1.74–3.51) | 2.22 (1.52–3.24) | ||
| Grade 3a | 2.59 (1.87–3.57) | 2.12 (1.50–3.00) | ||
| The number of central stenotic levels | 0.150 | |||
| 1b | 3.72 (2.72–5.09) | 0.011 | ||
| 2b | 3.64 (2.59–5.13) | 0.228 | ||
| 3b | 4.40 (2.89–6.70) | 0.282 | ||
| 4b | 4.47 (2.34–8.55) | 0.566 | ||
| 5b | 2.98 (0.82–10.79) | 0.096 | 0.199 | |
| The number of foraminal stenotic levels | 0.407 | |||
| 1b | 1.77 (1.34–2.35) | 0.144 | ||
| 2b | 1.99 (1.44–2.74) | 0.374 | ||
| 3b | 2.40 (1.47–3.94) | 0.462 | ||
| 4b | 3.01 (1.14–7.96) | 0.775 | ||
| 5b | 0.89 (0.09–8.65) | 0.922 | ||
aOdds compared to grade 0,
bOdds compared to 0 level
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier survival curve of overall LSS patients
Fig. 5Kaplan–Meier survival curve according to the grade of maximal central stenosis. No significant difference was observed in the survival curve between grades 1 and 2 of maximal central stenosis (p = 0.197)
Fig. 6Kaplan–Meier survival curve according to the grade of maximal foraminal stenosis. No significant difference was observed in the survival curve between grades 2 and 3 maximal foraminal stenosis (p = 0.830)