Literature DB >> 12477228

The natural history of lumbar degenerative spinal stenosis.

Michel Benoist1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to present current information on the natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis. As the population becomes older this condition is encountered more frequently. The diagnosis accuracy has improved and the number of cases detected is increasing intemationally. Because of the relative unpredictability of surgical treatment, good knowledge of natural evolution and of the predictive factors influencing the course of the disease is crucial. Unfortunately, and in contrast with numerous surgical series few studies have dealt with natural evolution. In addition to anecdotal reports, a few non randomized studies will be reviewed. Only one randomized study has compared shortand long term results of medical versus surgical treatment. Most of these studies are retrospective, with methodological flaws and are difficult to compare. At the present time no scientifically based recommandations can be made to LSS. patients at diagnosis. Similarly predictors of success of medical and surgical treatment still need to be identified. However results of the studies analyzed in this review suggest that a substantial proportion of patients do not automatically deteriorate and will remain unchanged or even improved by medical means. They also suggest that patients with severe baseline symptoms, block stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis tend to require surgical decompression. Randomized studies with the necessary ethical precautions are needed to obtain clear-cut conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477228     DOI: 10.1016/s1297-319x(02)00429-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joint Bone Spine        ISSN: 1297-319X            Impact factor:   4.929


  35 in total

1.  Prediction of long-term clinical outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  B Micankova Adamova; S Vohanka; L Dusek; J Jarkovsky; J Bednarik
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Wolfgang Börm; Frerk Meyer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Sandy Sajko; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

Review 4.  Imaging of lumbar degenerative disk disease: history and current state.

Authors:  Todd M Emch; Michael T Modic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Occult neural foraminal stenosis caused by association between disc degeneration and facet joint osteoarthritis: demonstration with dedicated upright MRI system.

Authors:  Alessandra Splendiani; Fabiana Ferrari; Antonio Barile; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Is the duration of pre-operative conservative treatment associated with the clinical outcome following surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis? A study based on the Spine Tango Registry.

Authors:  Thomas Zweig; Juliane Enke; Anne F Mannion; Rolf Sobottke; Markus Melloh; Brian J C Freeman; Emin Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Agnete Gulati; Tore Solberg; Charalampis Giannadakis; Mari Hoff; Glenn Haugeberg; Oystein Nygaard; Sasha Gulati
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2016-04-05

8.  Depressive symptoms during rehabilitation period predict poor outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year perspective.

Authors:  Sanna Sinikallio; Soili M Lehto; Timo Aalto; Olavi Airaksinen; Heikki Kröger; Heimo Viinamäki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  A prospective, masked 18-month minimum follow-up on neurophysiologic changes in persons with spinal stenosis, low back pain, and no symptoms.

Authors:  Andrew J Haig; Karen S J Yamakawa; Christopher Parres; Anthony Chiodo; Henry Tong
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 10.  Natural history of the aging spine.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.