Literature DB >> 29939845

Is there a Correlation Between Degree of Radiologic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and its Clinical Manifestation?

Tereza Andrasinova1, Blanka Adamova1,2, Jana Buskova3, Milos Kerkovsky3, Jiri Jarkovsky4, Josef Bednarik1,2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was an observational cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the degree of stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relates to the severity of clinical symptoms, disability, or neurological deficit in patients with symptomatic central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relationship between radiologic findings and the clinical manifestations of LSS remains unclear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 84 patients (42 men, median age 70 y) with neurogenic claudication and central degenerative LSS were included in the study. The MRI parameters describing severity (anteroposterior diameter of dural sac, cross-sectional area of the dural sac, stenosis ratio, and Schizas qualitative morphologic classification were evaluated at maximum stenotic level) and the extent of stenosis (the number of central stenotic levels) were correlated to symptoms (pain intensity, walking capacity), functional disability (measured in terms of the Oswestry Disability Index), and neurological signs of LSS (neurological status was evaluated and scored by Neurological Impairment Score in LSS).
RESULTS: A statistically significant correlation emerged only between the Neurological Impairment Score in LSS and Schizas morphologic classification (P=0.006). Pain intensity, walking capacity, and functional disability displayed no correlation with the MRI parameters of LSS.
CONCLUSIONS: LSS is a clinicoradiologic syndrome with complex relationships between degree of radiologic stenosis disclosed by MRI and clinical manifestations. Neurological impairment in the lower extremities reflects the degree of morphologic LSS on MRI. This study did not identify any association between the degree of stenosis and functional disability, pain intensity, or walking capacity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29939845     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  12 in total

1.  Computed Tomographic Epidurography in Patients with Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Single-Center Observational Study.

Authors:  Kimiaki Yokosuka; Kimiaki Sato; Kei Yamada; Tatsuhiro Yoshida; Takahiro Shimazaki; Shinji Morito; Kouta Nishida; Atsushi Matsuo; Takuma Fudo; Naoto Shiba
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19

2.  Reliability and Validity of the Boston Bedside Quantitative Sensory Testing Battery for Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Alexandra E Koulouris; Robert R Edwards; Kathleen Dorado; Kristin L Schreiber; Asimina Lazaridou; Sharika Rajan; Jeffrey White; Jenniffer Garcia; Christopher Gibbons; Roy Freeman
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.750

3.  Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systems.

Authors:  Yeon-Jee Ko; Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Chi Young Park; Jungheum Cho; Yusuhn Kang; Joong Mo Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  An observational study on trajectories and outcomes of chronic low back pain patients referred from a spine surgery division for chiropractic treatment.

Authors:  Brigitte Wirth; Fabienne Riner; Cynthia Peterson; Barry Kim Humphreys; Mazda Farshad; Susanne Becker; Petra Schweinhardt
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-02-05

5.  Do lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes predict neuropathic pain in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain?

Authors:  Eva Vagaska; Alexandra Litavcova; Iva Srotova; Eva Vlckova; Milos Kerkovsky; Jiri Jarkovsky; Josef Bednarik; Blanka Adamova
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Comparative Study Between Uniportal Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar and Tubular Approach in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Angela Carrascosa-Granada; Willian Velazquez; Ralf Wagner; Anwar Saab Mazzei; Andrés Vargas-Jimenez; Manuela Jorquera; Juan Antonio Barcia Albacar; Kita Sallabanda
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  The association between clinical symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis and MRI axial imaging findings.

Authors:  Yuki Fushimi; Koji Otani; Ryoji Tominaga; Masataka Nakamura; Miho Sekiguchi; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-11

8.  Reliability of preoperative MRI findings in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hasan Banitalebi; Ansgar Espeland; Masoud Anvar; Erland Hermansen; Christian Hellum; Jens Ivar Brox; Tor Åge Myklebust; Kari Indrekvam; Helena Brisby; Clemens Weber; Jørn Aaen; Ivar Magne Austevoll; Oliver Grundnes; Anne Negård
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Hand grip strength as a surrogate marker for postoperative changes in spinopelvic alignment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Ji-Won Kwon; Byung Ho Lee; Sahyun Sung; Soo-Bin Lee; Moon-Soo Park; Jun-Hee Cho; Jae-Ho Yang; Hwan-Mo Lee; Seong-Hwan Moon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic ventral facetectomy: An innovative substitute of open decompression surgery for lateral recess stenosis surgical treatment?

Authors:  Stylianos Kapetanakis; Nikolaos Gkantsinikoudis; Jannis V Papathanasiou; Georgios Charitoudis; Tryfon Thomaidis
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.