Literature DB >> 26352747

Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Clemens Weber1, Charalampis Giannadakis, Vidar Rao, Asgeir S Jakola, Ulf Nerland, Øystein P Nygaard, Tore K Solberg, Sasha Gulati, Ole Solheim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Observational multicenter study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the severity of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates with preoperative disability, pain, or surgical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgeons use the morphological appearance of LSS on MRI for clinical decision making. However, the associations between radiological severity of LSS and disability, pain, or surgical outcomes remain unclear.
METHODS: Evaluation of severity of LSS on preoperative MRI according to the Schizas morphological classification. Patient and treatment data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery. Preopertaive outcome measures were Oswestry disability index (ODI) and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain. Postopertive outcome measures were ODI and NRS scores for back and leg pain at 1 year, changes in ODI and NRS scores after treatment, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications.
RESULTS: Of 202 patients included, 7 were found to have mild stenosis, 38 had moderate stenosis, 108 had severe stenosis, and 49 had extreme stenosis. The radiological severity of LSS was not linked to preoperative ODI (P = 0.089), NRS back pain (P = 0.273), or NRS leg pain (P = 0.282) scores. There were no differences in ODI (P = 0.933), NRS back pain (P = 0.652), or NRS leg pain (P = 0.912) scores after 1 year. The radiological severity of stenosis was not associated with change in ODI (P = 0.494), NRS back pain (P = 0.235), NRS leg pain (P = 0.790), duration of surgery (P = 0.661), length of hospital stay (P = 0.739), or perioperative complication rates (P = 0.467).
CONCLUSION: Among patients who underwent decompressive surgery for LSS, radiological severity of stenosis was not associated with preoperative disability and pain, or clinical outcomes 1 year after surgery. In this patient group, the radiological severity of LSS has no clear clinical correlation and should therefore not be overemphasized in clinical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26352747     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.

Authors:  Christian Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Harry R Merk; Thomas Barz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Correlation of listhesis on upright radiographs and central lumbar spinal canal stenosis on supine MRI: is it possible to predict lumbar spinal canal stenosis?

Authors:  Tim Finkenstaedt; Filippo Del Grande; Nicolae Bolog; Nils H Ulrich; Sina Tok; Jakob M Burgstaller; Johann Steurer; Christine B Chung; Gustav Andreisek; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Percutaneous endoscopic decompression via transforaminal approach for lumbar lateral recess stenosis in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Chen; Rongqing Qin; Jie Hao; Cheng Chen; Baiyu Qian; Kai Yang; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The association between preoperative MRI findings and clinical improvement in patients included in the NORDSTEN spinal stenosis trial.

Authors:  Jørn Aaen; Hasan Banitalebi; Ivar Magne Austevoll; Christian Hellum; Kjersti Storheim; Tor Åge Myklebust; Masoud Anvar; Clemens Weber; Tore Solberg; Oliver Grundnes; Helena Brisby; Kari Indrekvam; Erland Hermansen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  A F Mannion; T F Fekete; D Pacifico; D O'Riordan; S Nauer; M von Büren; C Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Analysis of Dynamic Plantar Pressure before and after the Occurrence of Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Chao Xu; Xiao-Jiang Yang; Chang-Bo Lu; Wei Lei; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systems.

Authors:  Yeon-Jee Ko; Eugene Lee; Joon Woo Lee; Chi Young Park; Jungheum Cho; Yusuhn Kang; Joong Mo Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Current concepts and recent advances in understanding and managing lumbar spine stenosis.

Authors:  Carlos Bagley; Matthew MacAllister; Luke Dosselman; Jessica Moreno; Salah G Aoun; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-01-31

9.  Comparative effectiveness and prognostic factors for outcome of surgical and non-surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis in an elderly population: protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Helle Algren Brøgger; Thomas Maribo; Robin Christensen; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  [The application of classification of lateral region of lumbar spinal canal for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients using full endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery].

Authors:  Jin Yang; Yu Wang; Qingquan Kong
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-04-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.