Literature DB >> 35701657

Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies.

Ellen Gruenbaum1, Brian D Earp2, Richard A Shweder3.   

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), customary female genital modification practices common in parts of Africa, South and Southeast Asia, and the Middle East are inherently patriarchal: they reflect deep-rooted inequality between the sexes characterized by male dominance and constitute an extreme form of discrimination against women. However, scholars have noted that while many societies have genital modification rites only for boys, with no equivalent rite for girls, the inverse does not hold. Rather, almost all societies that practice ritual female genital modification also practice ritual male genital modification, often for comparable reasons on children of similar ages, with the female rites led by women and the male rites led by men. In contrast, then, to the situation for boys in various cultures, girls are not singled out for genital modification on account of their sex or gender; nor do the social meanings of the female rites necessarily reflect a lower status. In some cases, the women's rite serves to promote female within-sex bonding and network building-as the men's rite typically does for males-thereby counterbalancing gendered asymmetries in political power and weakening male dominance in certain spheres. In such cases, and to that extent, the female rites can be described as counter-patriarchal. Selective efforts to discourage female genital modifications may thus inadvertently undermine women-centered communal networks while leaving male bonding rites intact. Scholars and activists should not rely on misleading generalizations from the WHO about the relationship between genital cutting and the social positioning of women as compared to men. To illustrate the complexity of this relationship, we compare patterns of practice across contemporary societies while also highlighting anthropological data regarding pre-industrial societies. Regarding the latter, we find no association between the presence of a female initiation rite and a key aspect of patriarchy as it is classically understood, namely, social endorsement of a gendered double-standard regarding premarital sexual activity. We situate this finding within the broader literature and discuss potential implications.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35701657     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00581-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.896


  28 in total

Review 1.  The medicalization of female "circumcision": harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice?

Authors:  B Shell-Duncan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Interpreting female genital cutting: moving beyond the impasse.

Authors:  L Leonard
Journal:  Annu Rev Sex Res       Date:  2000

3.  Labia reduction for non-therapeutic reasons vs. female genital mutilation: contradictions in law and practice in Britain.

Authors:  Marge Berer
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2010-05

Review 4.  Genital cutting and western discourses on sexuality.

Authors:  Kirsten Bell
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2005-06

5.  The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision.

Authors:  J R Taylor; A P Lockwood; A J Taylor
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1996-02

6.  Moral Hypocrisy or Intellectual Inconsistency?: A Historical Perspective on Our Habit of Placing Male and Female Genital Cutting in Separate Ethical Boxes.

Authors:  Robert Darby
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2016-06

7.  From sameness to difference: Swedish Somalis' post-migration perceptions of the circumcision of girls and boys.

Authors:  Anna Wahlberg; Birgitta Essén; Sara Johnsdotter
Journal:  Cult Health Sex       Date:  2018-11-09

8.  Attitudes towards comparison of male and female genital cutting in a Swedish Somali population.

Authors:  Adam Hanberger; Birgitta Essén; Anna Wahlberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Sculptors of African Women's Bodies: Forces Reshaping the Embodiment of Female Genital Cutting in the West.

Authors:  Crista E Johnson-Agbakwu; Emily Manin
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-04-23

10.  Attitudes of health care providers regarding female genital mutilation and its medicalization in Guinea.

Authors:  Mamadou Dioulde Balde; Sarah O'Neill; Alpha Oumar Sall; Mamadou Bailo Balde; Anne Marie Soumah; BoubacarAlpha Diallo; Christina Catherine Pallitto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.