Literature DB >> 27477193

Moral Hypocrisy or Intellectual Inconsistency?: A Historical Perspective on Our Habit of Placing Male and Female Genital Cutting in Separate Ethical Boxes.

Robert Darby.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27477193     DOI： 10.1353/ken.2016.0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN： 1054-6863


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  When Religion and Medicine Clash: Non-beneficial Treatments and Hope for a Miracle.

Authors:  Philip M Rosoff
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2019-06

2.  Public Health Research Priorities to Address Female Genital Mutilation or Cutting in the United States.

Authors:  Holly G Atkinson; Deborah Ottenheimer; Ranit Mishori
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Current critiques of the WHO policy on female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Brian D Earp; Sara Johnsdotter
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 4.  Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies.

Authors:  Ellen Gruenbaum; Brian D Earp; Richard A Shweder
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  How Canadian Law Shapes the Health Care Experiences of Women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting/Circumcision and Their Providers: A Disjuncture Between Expectation and Actuality.

Authors:  Danielle Jacobson; Daniel Grace; Janice Boddy; Gillian Einstein
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-09-28

6.  Is Circumcision "Necessary" in Islam? A Philosophical Argument Based on Peer Disagreement.

Authors:  Hossein Dabbagh
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-08-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.