Literature DB >> 11266046

The medicalization of female "circumcision": harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice?

B Shell-Duncan1.   

Abstract

In recent decades the practice of female "circumcision" has come under intense international scrutiny, often conceptualized as a violation of women's basic right to health. Although the adverse health consequences of female "circumcision" form the basis of opposition to the practice, anti-circumcision activists, as well as many international medical associations, largely oppose measures to improve its safety. The debate over medicalization of female "circumcision" has, up until now, been cast as a moral dilemma: to protect women's health at the expense of legitimating a destructive practice? Or to hasten the elimination of a dangerous practice while allowing women to die from preventable conditions? This paper seeks to re-examine this debate by conceptualizing medicalization of female "circumcision" as a harm-reduction strategy. Harm reduction is a new paradigm in the field of public health that aims to minimize the health hazards associated with risky behaviors, such as intravenous drug use and high-risk sexual behavior, by encouraging safer alternatives, including, but not limited to abstinence. Harm reduction considers a wide range of alternatives, and promotes the alternative that is culturally acceptable and bears the least amount of harm. This paper evaluates the applicability of harm reduction principles to medical interventions for female "circumcision," and draws parallels to other harm reduction programs. In this light, arguments for opposing medicalization of female "circumcision", including the assertion that it counteracts efforts to eliminate the practice, are critically evaluated, revealing that there is not sufficient evidence to support staunch opposition to medicalization. Rather, it appears that medicalization, if implemented as a harm-reduction strategy, may be a sound and compassionate approach to improving women's health in settings where abandonment of the practice of "circumcision" is not immediately attainable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11266046     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00208-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  29 in total

1.  Towards a gender perspective in qualitative research on voluntary medical male circumcision in east and southern Africa.

Authors:  Guillermo Martínez Pérez; Laura Triviño Durán; Angel Gasch; Nicole Desmond
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 2.  Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: how should healthcare providers respond?

Authors:  Lih Mei Liao; Sarah M Creighton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-26

Review 3.  Female genital mutilation in Djibouti.

Authors:  M Martinelli; J E Ollé-Goig
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.927

Review 4.  Current critiques of the WHO policy on female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Brian D Earp; Sara Johnsdotter
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies.

Authors:  Ellen Gruenbaum; Brian D Earp; Richard A Shweder
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Female circumcision debate: A muslim surgeon's perspective.

Authors:  M Ihsan Karaman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2021-05

7.  Effect of parental attitudes on the practice and medicalization of female genital mutilation: a secondary analysis of Egypt Health Issues Survey, 2015.

Authors:  Mirette Aziz; Omaima Elgibaly; Fatma Elzahraa Ibrahim
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.742

8.  Geographic variation of female genital mutilation and legal enforcement in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study of Senegal.

Authors:  Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala; Paul N Komba
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 2.345

9.  Internalizing knowledge and changing attitudes to female genital cutting/mutilation.

Authors:  Inger-Lise Lien; Jon-Håkon Schultz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-06-12

10.  Attitudes toward Female Circumcision among Men and Women in Two Districts in Somalia: Is It Time to Rethink Our Eradication Strategy in Somalia?

Authors:  Abdi A Gele; Bente P Bø; Johanne Sundby
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-04-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.