Literature DB >> 15974324

Genital cutting and western discourses on sexuality.

Kirsten Bell1.   

Abstract

This article explores dominant discourses surrounding male and female genital cutting. Over a similar period of time, these genital operations have separately been subjected to scrutiny and criticism. However, although critiques of female circumcision have been widely taken up, general public opinion toward male circumcision remains indifferent. This difference cannot merely be explained by the natural attributes and effects of these practices. Rather, attitudes toward genital cutting reflect historically and culturally specific understandings of the human body. In particular, I suggest that certain problematic understandings of male and female sexuality are deeply implicated in the dominant Western discourses on genital surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15974324     DOI: 10.1525/maq.2005.19.2.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Anthropol Q        ISSN: 0745-5194


  10 in total

1.  Towards a gender perspective in qualitative research on voluntary medical male circumcision in east and southern Africa.

Authors:  Guillermo Martínez Pérez; Laura Triviño Durán; Angel Gasch; Nicole Desmond
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 2.  Current critiques of the WHO policy on female genital mutilation.

Authors:  Brian D Earp; Sara Johnsdotter
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 3.  Reconsidering the role of patriarchy in upholding female genital modifications: analysis of contemporary and pre-industrial societies.

Authors:  Ellen Gruenbaum; Brian D Earp; Richard A Shweder
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Global phylogenetic analysis reveals multiple origins and correlates of genital mutilation/cutting.

Authors:  Gabriel Šaffa; Jan Zrzavý; Pavel Duda
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2022-03-31

5.  Protecting Children from Medically Unnecessary Genital Cutting Without Stigmatizing Women's Bodies: Implications for Sexual Pleasure and Pain.

Authors:  Brian D Earp
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2020-01-21

6.  "Now we are in a different time; various bad diseases have come." Understanding men's acceptability of male circumcision for HIV prevention in a moderate prevalence setting.

Authors:  Angela Kelly; Martha Kupul; Lisa Fitzgerald; Herick Aeno; James Neo; Richard Naketrumb; Peter Siba; John M Kaldor; Andrew Vallely
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Men in Papua New Guinea accurately report their circumcision status.

Authors:  Parana Hewage Mangalasiri Jayathunge; William John Hannan McBride; David MacLaren; Kelwyn Browne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates.

Authors:  Samuel Kimani; Bettina Shell-Duncan
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2018-02-21

Review 9.  The Impact of Migration on Attitudes to Female Genital Cutting and Experiences of Sexual Dysfunction Among Migrant Women with FGC.

Authors:  Sara Johnsdotter
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2018-02-23

10.  Social media representation of female genital cutting: A YouTube analysis.

Authors:  Arone Wondwossen Fantaye; Anne Tm Konkle
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.