Literature DB >> 35697775

Evaluation of novel 3D-printed and conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision patient fixation masks for radiotherapy.

Veronika M Miron1, Tanja Etzelstorfer2, Raimund Kleiser3, Tobias Raffelsberger3, Zoltan Major4, Hans Geinitz2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For stereotactic radiation therapy of intracranial malignancies, a patient's head needs to be immobilized with high accuracy. Fixation devices such as invasive stereotactic head frames or non-invasive thermoplastic mask systems are often used. However, especially stereotactic high-precision masks often cause discomfort for patients due to a long manufacturing time during which the patient is required to lie still and because the face is covered, including the mouth, nose, eyes, and ears. To avoid these issues, the target was to develop a non-invasive 3D-printable mask system with at least the accuracy of the high-precision masks, for producing masks which can be manufactured in the absence of patients and which allow the eyes, mouth, and nose to be uncovered during therapy.
METHODS: For four volunteers, a personalized 3D-printed mask based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was designed and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Additionally, for each of the volunteers, a conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision mask from Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) was fabricated. The intra-fractional fixation accuracy for each mask and volunteer was evaluated using the motion-correction algorithm of functional MRI measurements with and without guided motion.
RESULTS: The average values for the translations and rotations of the volunteers' heads lie in the range between ±1 mm and ±1° for both masks. Interestingly, the standard deviations and the relative and absolute 3D displacements are lower for the 3D-printed masks compared to the Brainlab masks.
CONCLUSION: It could be shown that the intra-fractional fixation accuracy of the 3D-printed masks was higher than for the conventional stereotactic high-precision masks.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Patient fixation masks; Radiotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35697775      PMCID: PMC9581856          DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01963-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   4.033


  15 in total

1.  Preliminary study of potential for rapid prototype and surface scanned radiotherapy facemask production technique.

Authors:  B Sanghera; A Amis; M McGurk
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb

2.  Intra- and interfractional patient motion for a variety of immobilization devices.

Authors:  Martijn Engelsman; Stanley J Rosenthal; Susan L Michaud; Judith A Adams; Robert J Schneider; Stephen G Bradley; Jacob B Flanz; Hanne M Kooy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Repositioning accuracy of two different mask systems-3D revisited: comparison using true 3D/3D matching with cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Judit Boda-Heggemann; Cornelia Walter; Angelika Rahn; Hansjörg Wertz; Iris Loeb; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  An assessment of the magnitude of intra-fraction movement of head-and-neck IMRT cases and its implication on the action-level of the imaging protocol.

Authors:  Pei Ping Eric Pang; Julie Hendry; Shie Lee Cheah; Yoke Lim Soong; Kam Weng Fong; Tien Seng Joseph Wee; Wee Kiat Terence Tan; Wen Long Nei; Fuqiang Wang; Ru Xin Wong; Wee Loon Ng; John Chen
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Patient position reproducibility in fractionated stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy using the BrainLab mask system.

Authors:  H Alheit; S Dornfeld; M Dawel; M Alheit; B Henzel; K Steckler; H Blank; P Geyer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Report on a randomized trial comparing two forms of immobilization of the head for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Authors:  Greg Bednarz; Mitchell Machtay; Maria Werner-Wasik; Beverly Downes; Joachim Bogner; Terry Hyslop; James Galvin; James Evans; Walter Curran; David Andrews
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors.

Authors:  L Gilbeau; M Octave-Prignot; T Loncol; L Renard; P Scalliet; V Grégoire
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  To frame or not to frame? Cone-beam CT-based analysis of head immobilization devices specific to linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Steven Babic; Young Lee; Mark Ruschin; Fiona Lochray; Alex Lightstone; Eshetu Atenafu; Nic Phan; Todd Mainprize; May Tsao; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  A review of 3D printed patient specific immobilisation devices in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Amirhossein Asfia; James I Novak; Mazher Iqbal Mohammed; Bernard Rolfe; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-03-20

10.  Radiotherapy Immobilization Mask Molding Through the Use of 3D-Printed Head Models.

Authors:  Quoc-Viêt Vincent Pham; Annie-Pier Lavallée; Alexandru Foias; David Roberge; Ellis Mitrou; Philip Wong
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.