Veronika M Miron1, Tanja Etzelstorfer2, Raimund Kleiser3, Tobias Raffelsberger3, Zoltan Major4, Hans Geinitz2. 1. Institute of Polymer Product Engineering, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040, Linz, Austria. veronika.maria.miron@gmail.com. 2. Abteilung für Radioonkologie, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010, Linz, Austria. 3. Department of Neuroradiology, Johannes Kepler University Clinic, Wagner-Jauregg-Weg 15, 4020, Linz, Austria. 4. Institute of Polymer Product Engineering, Johannes Kepler University, Altenberger Str. 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: For stereotactic radiation therapy of intracranial malignancies, a patient's head needs to be immobilized with high accuracy. Fixation devices such as invasive stereotactic head frames or non-invasive thermoplastic mask systems are often used. However, especially stereotactic high-precision masks often cause discomfort for patients due to a long manufacturing time during which the patient is required to lie still and because the face is covered, including the mouth, nose, eyes, and ears. To avoid these issues, the target was to develop a non-invasive 3D-printable mask system with at least the accuracy of the high-precision masks, for producing masks which can be manufactured in the absence of patients and which allow the eyes, mouth, and nose to be uncovered during therapy. METHODS: For four volunteers, a personalized 3D-printed mask based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was designed and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Additionally, for each of the volunteers, a conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision mask from Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) was fabricated. The intra-fractional fixation accuracy for each mask and volunteer was evaluated using the motion-correction algorithm of functional MRI measurements with and without guided motion. RESULTS: The average values for the translations and rotations of the volunteers' heads lie in the range between ±1 mm and ±1° for both masks. Interestingly, the standard deviations and the relative and absolute 3D displacements are lower for the 3D-printed masks compared to the Brainlab masks. CONCLUSION: It could be shown that the intra-fractional fixation accuracy of the 3D-printed masks was higher than for the conventional stereotactic high-precision masks.
PURPOSE: For stereotactic radiation therapy of intracranial malignancies, a patient's head needs to be immobilized with high accuracy. Fixation devices such as invasive stereotactic head frames or non-invasive thermoplastic mask systems are often used. However, especially stereotactic high-precision masks often cause discomfort for patients due to a long manufacturing time during which the patient is required to lie still and because the face is covered, including the mouth, nose, eyes, and ears. To avoid these issues, the target was to develop a non-invasive 3D-printable mask system with at least the accuracy of the high-precision masks, for producing masks which can be manufactured in the absence of patients and which allow the eyes, mouth, and nose to be uncovered during therapy. METHODS: For four volunteers, a personalized 3D-printed mask based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data was designed and manufactured using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Additionally, for each of the volunteers, a conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision mask from Brainlab AG (Munich, Germany) was fabricated. The intra-fractional fixation accuracy for each mask and volunteer was evaluated using the motion-correction algorithm of functional MRI measurements with and without guided motion. RESULTS: The average values for the translations and rotations of the volunteers' heads lie in the range between ±1 mm and ±1° for both masks. Interestingly, the standard deviations and the relative and absolute 3D displacements are lower for the 3D-printed masks compared to the Brainlab masks. CONCLUSION: It could be shown that the intra-fractional fixation accuracy of the 3D-printed masks was higher than for the conventional stereotactic high-precision masks.
Authors: Martijn Engelsman; Stanley J Rosenthal; Susan L Michaud; Judith A Adams; Robert J Schneider; Stephen G Bradley; Jacob B Flanz; Hanne M Kooy Journal: Med Phys Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: H Alheit; S Dornfeld; M Dawel; M Alheit; B Henzel; K Steckler; H Blank; P Geyer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Greg Bednarz; Mitchell Machtay; Maria Werner-Wasik; Beverly Downes; Joachim Bogner; Terry Hyslop; James Galvin; James Evans; Walter Curran; David Andrews Journal: Med Phys Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Steven Babic; Young Lee; Mark Ruschin; Fiona Lochray; Alex Lightstone; Eshetu Atenafu; Nic Phan; Todd Mainprize; May Tsao; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2018-01-24 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Quoc-Viêt Vincent Pham; Annie-Pier Lavallée; Alexandru Foias; David Roberge; Ellis Mitrou; Philip Wong Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2018-01-01