PURPOSE: Dedicated mask systems nowadays allow the use of stereotactic radiotherapy in fractionated regimes, therefore combining the advantages of high precision radiotherapy with the biological benefit of fractionation. Therefore the knowledge of institution specific isocenter accuracy is essential for decision-making about margins to be allowed to form the planning target volume. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Measurements of isocenter deviations during fractionated treatments were performed in 33 patients using the simulator Simulix-xy (Oldelft) in connection with the BrainLab angiographic localizer-box as well as port-films. In both cases repeated images were overlaid by use of anatomical landmarks with a methodical accuracy in the order of 0.5 mm. RESULTS: Both methods yield random isocenter deviations of less then 2 mm (standard deviation) in all three directions and no significant systematic deviations. These values are in the order of the accuracy of the method, obtained by comparison of two independent investigators, as well as they are comparable with the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of less than 2 mm indicates safety margins of 3-4 mm as sufficient for clinical routine to cover the target in 95.5% of all set-ups (2 SD).
PURPOSE: Dedicated mask systems nowadays allow the use of stereotactic radiotherapy in fractionated regimes, therefore combining the advantages of high precision radiotherapy with the biological benefit of fractionation. Therefore the knowledge of institution specific isocenter accuracy is essential for decision-making about margins to be allowed to form the planning target volume. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Measurements of isocenter deviations during fractionated treatments were performed in 33 patients using the simulator Simulix-xy (Oldelft) in connection with the BrainLab angiographic localizer-box as well as port-films. In both cases repeated images were overlaid by use of anatomical landmarks with a methodical accuracy in the order of 0.5 mm. RESULTS: Both methods yield random isocenter deviations of less then 2 mm (standard deviation) in all three directions and no significant systematic deviations. These values are in the order of the accuracy of the method, obtained by comparison of two independent investigators, as well as they are comparable with the literature. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of less than 2 mm indicates safety margins of 3-4 mm as sufficient for clinical routine to cover the target in 95.5% of all set-ups (2 SD).
Authors: I Compter; K Zaugg; R M A Houben; J T A Dings; G Bosmans; C Buescher; M M H M E Anten; B G Baumert Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-09-09 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Amish P Shah; Dylan T Meeks; Twyla R Willoughby; Naren Ramakrishna; Christopher J Warner; Cameron W Swanick; Patrick Kelly; Sanford L Meeks Journal: J Radiosurg SBRT Date: 2020
Authors: A Theelen; J Martens; G Bosmans; R Houben; J J Jager; I Rutten; P Lambin; A W Minken; B G Baumert Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-12-24 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Martin Henzel; Klaus Hamm; Helmut Sitter; Markus W Gross; Gunnar Surber; Gabriele Kleinert; Rita Engenhart-Cabillic Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-09-12 Impact factor: 3.621