Literature DB >> 19235368

Report on a randomized trial comparing two forms of immobilization of the head for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.

Greg Bednarz1, Mitchell Machtay, Maria Werner-Wasik, Beverly Downes, Joachim Bogner, Terry Hyslop, James Galvin, James Evans, Walter Curran, David Andrews.   

Abstract

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) requires accurate and reproducible immobilization of the patient's head. This randomized study compared the efficacy of two commonly used forms of immobilization used for SRT. Two routinely used methods of immobilization, which differ in their approach to reproduce the head position from day to day, are the Gill-Thomas-Cosman (GTC) frame and the BrainLab thermoplastic mask. The GTC frame fixates on the patient's upper dentition and thus is in direct mechanical contact with the cranium. The BrainLab mask is a two-part masking system custom fitted to the front and back of the patient's head. After patients signed an IRB-approved informed consent form, eligible patients were randomized to either GTC frame or mask for their course of SRT. Patients were treated as per standard procedure; however, prior to each treatment a set of digital kilovolt images (ExacTrac, BrainLabAB, Germany) was taken. These images were fused with reference digitally reconstructed radiographs obtained from treatment planning CT to yield lateral, longitudinal, and vertical deviations of isocenter and head rotations about respective axes. The primary end point of the study was to compare the two systems with respect to mean and standard deviations using the distance to isocenter measure. A total of 84 patients were enrolled (69 patients evaluable with detailed positioning data). A mixed-effect linear regression and two-tiled t test were used to compare the distance measure for both the systems. There was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference between mean distances for these systems, suggesting that the GTC frame was more accurate. The mean 3D displacement and standard deviations were 3.17+1.95 mm for mask and 2.00+1.04 mm for frame. Both immobilization techniques were highly effective, but the GTC frame was more accurate. To optimize the accuracy of SRT, daily kilovolt image guidance is recommended with either immobilization system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19235368     DOI: 10.1118/1.3030950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of positional correction for the floor-mounted kV X-ray IGRT system in angled couch positions.

Authors:  Satoshi Koubuchi; Toru Takakura; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Takashi Mizowaki; Manabu Nakata; Masahiro Hiraoka
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-13

2.  Relocatable fixation systems in intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy. Accuracy of serial CT scans and patient acceptance in a randomized design.

Authors:  A Theelen; J Martens; G Bosmans; R Houben; J J Jager; I Rutten; P Lambin; A W Minken; B G Baumert
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Efficient implementation of the rank correlation merit function for 2D/3D registration.

Authors:  M Figl; C Bloch; C Gendrin; C Weber; S A Pawiro; J Hummel; P Markelj; F Pernus; H Bergmann; W Birkfellner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Evaluation of novel 3D-printed and conventional thermoplastic stereotactic high-precision patient fixation masks for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Veronika M Miron; Tanja Etzelstorfer; Raimund Kleiser; Tobias Raffelsberger; Zoltan Major; Hans Geinitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Quantifying the effects of positional uncertainties and estimating margins for Gamma-Knife® fractionated radiosurgery of large brain metastases.

Authors:  Béatrice Reiner; Peter Bownes; David L Buckley; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2017

6.  Quantifying the trigger level of the vacuum surveillance system of the Gamma-Knife eXtend™ positioning system and evaluating the potential impact on dose delivery.

Authors:  Béatrice Reiner; Peter Bownes; David L Buckley; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

7.  A neural network-based 2D/3D image registration quality evaluator for pediatric patient setup in external beam radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Wu; Zhong Su; Zuofeng Li
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  To frame or not to frame? Cone-beam CT-based analysis of head immobilization devices specific to linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Steven Babic; Young Lee; Mark Ruschin; Fiona Lochray; Alex Lightstone; Eshetu Atenafu; Nic Phan; Todd Mainprize; May Tsao; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Immobilization precision of a modified GTC frame.

Authors:  Brian Winey; Juliane Daartz; Frank Dankers; Marc Bussière
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.