| Literature DB >> 35677160 |
Guihua Zhong1,2, Wei Wei1,2, Wei Liao3, Rong Wang1,2, Yingpeng Peng1,2, Yuling Zhou1,2, Xiaotao Huang1,2, Shiping Xian4, Shunli Peng1,2, Zhaoyuan Zhang1,2, Shaoyan Feng3, Ye Liu4, Haiyu Hong3, Yunfei Xia5, Yan Yan2,6, Qiaodan Liu1,2, Zhigang Liu1,2.
Abstract
Introduction: Previous studies have reported a close relationship between cancer and microbes, particularly gut and tumor microbiota; however, the presence of tumor microbiome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its role in the prognosis of NPC remain unclear.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; chronic nasopharyngitis; nasopharyngeal carcinoma; progression-free survival; tumor microbiome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35677160 PMCID: PMC9168217 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.859721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Characteristics of the included participants.
| Demographic variables | NPC (n = 50) | Control (n = 14) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 50.4 ± 10.8 | 37.0 ± 13.1 |
|
|
| 0.736 | ||
| Male | 38 (76.0) | 10 (71.4) | |
| Female | 12 (24.0) | 4 (28.6) | |
|
| 0.546 | ||
| No | 33 (66.0) | 8 (57.1) | |
| Yes | 17 (34.00) | 6 (42.9) | |
|
| 0.673 | ||
| No | 7 (14.0) | 1 (7.1) | |
| Yes | 43 (86.0) | 13 (92.9) |
The values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or n (%) unless otherwise stated. NPC, Patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Control, the control group of patients with chronic nasopharyngitis. p < 0.05 (the bold value) in the table indicates a statistical significance.
Figure 1The intratissue microbiome diversity between the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) group and the control group. (A) Venn and UpSet diagrams illustrate shared ASVs in both the NPC and control groups. The alpha diversity in the NPC group and the control group is estimated by Chao1 index (B), Shannon index (C), and inverse Simpson index (D). (E) Beta diversity is measured by principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on Bray-Curtis distance metrics. (F) Representative cores depict the staining of bacterial LPS patterns in NPC and chronic nasopharyngitis. The asterisks indicate the region selected for higher magnification at 40X.
Figure 2Distinct microbiome composition between the NPC group and the control group. Taxonomic composition in the NPC group and the control group exhibits average relative abundance at the phylum (A) and genus (B) levels. (C) Differential taxa from phylum to species were identified by LEfSe with a meeting LDA significant value (LDA > 2, red color indicating taxa abundant in the control group; green in the NPC group). (D) Cladogram shows the differential taxa at all levels from phylum to species. (E) Differential taxa at the genus level are represented (LDA > 2, red color indicating taxa enriched in the control group; green in the NPC group).
Figure 3Differential genera and metabolic function pathways associated with NPC and chronic nasopharyngitis. (A) A heatmap shows the relative abundance of significant genera between the NPC group and the control group (Mann–Whitney tests, unadjusted p value < 0.05). (B) Differential genera in relative abundance detected by a MaAsLin model with adjustment for age are exhibited (* means corrected Q value < 0.25). (C) ROC curve analysis of differential genera for diagnosis of NPC from chronic nasopharyngitis. (D) Distinct metabolic pathways compared between NPC and chronic nasopharyngitis based on KEGG with FDR corrected p value (Q value < 0.05).
Figure 4Correlations between genera in the NPC group and the control group. Correlation among 17 significant genera with unadjusted p value < 0.05 in the NPC group (A) and the control group (B) (*correlation p value < 0.05, red color indicating taxa enriched in the control group; blue in the NPC group). Distinct patterns of significant genera in the NPC group (C) and the control group (D) are plotted by network plot based on statistically significant correlations (correlation p value < 0.05).
Characteristics and univariate analysis of PFS in the participants with NPC.
| Covariates | R (n = 32) | NR (n = 10) |
| Univariate analysis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| ||||
|
| 48.8 ± 7.4 | 57.7 ± 13.3 | 0.068 | 1.087 (1.01, 1.12) |
|
|
| 0.606 | ||||
| Male | 24 (75.0) | 6 (60.0) | Reference | ||
| Female | 8 (25.0) | 4 (40.0) | 1.34 (0.37, 4.77) | 0.656 | |
|
| 0.117 | ||||
| No | 18 (56.2) | 9 (90.0) | Reference | ||
| Yes | 14 (43.8) | 1 (10.0) | 0.10 (0.01, 0.85) |
| |
|
| 1.000 | ||||
| No | 28 (87.5) | 9 (90.0) | Reference | ||
| Yes | 4 (12.5) | 1 (10.0) | 0.60 (0.07, 4.90) | 0.635 | |
|
|
| ||||
| I + II + III | 26 (81.2) | 2 (20.0) | Reference | ||
| IVa + IVb | 6 (18.8) | 8 (80.0) | 7.66 (1.61, 36.43) |
| |
|
| 1.69 (1.16, 2.48) |
| |||
|
| 3.78 (1.45, 9.87) |
| |||
|
| 5.11 (2.04, 12.77) |
| |||
|
| 1.06 (1.01, 1.11) |
| |||
The values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or n (%) unless otherwise stated.
R, Patients without progressive disease after standard treatments; NR, Patients with progressive disease after standard treatments. p < 0.05 (the bold values) in the table indicates a statistical significance.
Figure 5Differential genera serving as prognostic factors for NPC. (A) The alpha diversity in the NR and R groups is estimated by Shannon index. (B) Significant genera in relative abundance detected by a MaAsLin model with adjustment for age * means (corrected Q value < 0.25). (C) ROC curve analysis of differential genera for diagnosis of R from NR for NPC treatments. (D) Forest plot reveals the selected covariates on clinical characteristics and significant genera tested by multivariate COX regression analysis. (E) Kaplan-Meier (K-M) plot of the PFS by Log-rank test in patients with high relative abundance and low relative abundance of Turicibacter (cutoff: 0.0046).