Rui You1,2,3, You-Ping Liu1,2,3, Pei-Yu Huang1,2,3, Xiong Zou1,2,3, Rui Sun1,2,3, Yu-Xiang He4, Yi-Shan Wu1,2,3, Guo-Ping Shen5, Hong-Dan Zhang6, Chong-Yang Duan7, Sze Huey Tan8, Jing-Yu Cao1,2,3, Ji-Bin Li2,9, Yu-Long Xie1,2,3, Yi-Nuan Zhang1,2,3, Zhi-Qiang Wang1,2,3, Qi Yang1,2,3, Mei Lin1,2,3, Rou Jiang1,2,3, Meng-Xia Zhang1,2,3, Yi-Jun Hua1,2,3, Lin-Quan Tang1,2,3, Ai-Hua Zhuang2, Qiu-Yan Chen1,2,3, Ling Guo1,2,3, Hao-Yuan Mo1,2,3, Yong Chen5, Hai-Qiang Mai1,2,3, Li Ling10, Qing Liu2,11, Melvin Lee Kiang Chua12,13, Ming-Yuan Chen1,2,3. 1. Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 2. Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine. 3. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou 510080, China. 7. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. 8. Division of Clinical Trials and Epidemiological Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore. 9. Department of Clinical Trials Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China. 10. Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China. 11. Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 12. Division of Radiation Oncology and Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 169610, Singapore. 13. Oncology Academic Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, 169857, Singapore.
Abstract
Importance: The role of locoregional radiotherapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) is unclear. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of locoregional radiotherapy in de novo mNPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients with biopsy-proven mNPC, who demonstrated complete or partial response (RECIST v1.1) following 3 cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy, were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Overall, 126 of 173 patients screened were eligible to the study, and randomized to chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (n = 63) or chemotherapy alone (n = 63). Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 26.7 (17.2-33.5) months. Interventions: The chemotherapy regimens were fluorouracil continuous intravenous infusion at 5 g/m2 over 120 hours and 100 mg/m2 intravenous cisplatin on day 1, administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients assigned to the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Overall, 126 patients were enrolled (105 men [83.3%] and 21 women [16.7%]; median [IQR] age, 46 [39-52] years). The 24-month OS was 76.4% (95% CI, 64.4%-88.4%) in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group, compared with 54.5% (95% CI, 41.0%-68.0%) in the chemotherapy-alone group. The study met its primary end point of improved OS (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; P = .004) in favor of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Progression-free survival was also improved in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy-alone group (stratified HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57). No significant differences in acute hematological or gastrointestinal toxic effects were observed between the treatment arms. The frequency of acute grade 3 or higher dermatitis, mucositis, and xerostomia was 8.1%, 33.9%, and 6.5%, respectively, in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. The frequency of late severe grade 3 or higher hearing loss and trismus was 5.2% and 3.4%, respectively, in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, radiotherapy added to chemotherapy significantly improved OS in chemotherapy-sensitive patients with mNPC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111460.
Importance: The role of locoregional radiotherapy in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC) is unclear. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of locoregional radiotherapy in de novo mNPC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients with biopsy-proven mNPC, who demonstrated complete or partial response (RECIST v1.1) following 3 cycles of cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy, were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone. Overall, 126 of 173 patients screened were eligible to the study, and randomized to chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (n = 63) or chemotherapy alone (n = 63). Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 26.7 (17.2-33.5) months. Interventions: The chemotherapy regimens were fluorouracil continuous intravenous infusion at 5 g/m2 over 120 hours and 100 mg/m2 intravenous cisplatin on day 1, administered every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients assigned to the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Overall, 126 patients were enrolled (105 men [83.3%] and 21 women [16.7%]; median [IQR] age, 46 [39-52] years). The 24-month OS was 76.4% (95% CI, 64.4%-88.4%) in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group, compared with 54.5% (95% CI, 41.0%-68.0%) in the chemotherapy-alone group. The study met its primary end point of improved OS (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.77; P = .004) in favor of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Progression-free survival was also improved in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy-alone group (stratified HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23-0.57). No significant differences in acute hematological or gastrointestinal toxic effects were observed between the treatment arms. The frequency of acute grade 3 or higher dermatitis, mucositis, and xerostomia was 8.1%, 33.9%, and 6.5%, respectively, in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. The frequency of late severe grade 3 or higher hearing loss and trismus was 5.2% and 3.4%, respectively, in the chemotherapy plus radiotherapy group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, radiotherapy added to chemotherapy significantly improved OS in chemotherapy-sensitive patients with mNPC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111460.
Authors: R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A W Lee; Y F Poon; W Foo; S C Law; F K Cheung; D K Chan; S Y Tung; M Thaw; J H Ho Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1992 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Christopher C Parker; Nicholas D James; Christopher D Brawley; Noel W Clarke; Alex P Hoyle; Adnan Ali; Alastair W S Ritchie; Gerhardt Attard; Simon Chowdhury; William Cross; David P Dearnaley; Silke Gillessen; Clare Gilson; Robert J Jones; Ruth E Langley; Zafar I Malik; Malcolm D Mason; David Matheson; Robin Millman; J Martin Russell; George N Thalmann; Claire L Amos; Roberto Alonzi; Amit Bahl; Alison Birtle; Omar Din; Hassan Douis; Chinnamani Eswar; Joanna Gale; Melissa R Gannon; Sai Jonnada; Sara Khaksar; Jason F Lester; Joe M O'Sullivan; Omi A Parikh; Ian D Pedley; Delia M Pudney; Denise J Sheehan; Narayanan Nair Srihari; Anna T H Tran; Mahesh K B Parmar; Matthew R Sydes Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-10-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rohan R Katipally; Sean P Pitroda; Aditya Juloori; Steven J Chmura; Ralph R Weichselbaum Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 65.011
Authors: Jessica A Scarborough; Martin C Tom; Michael W Kattan; Jacob G Scott Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 8.013