Literature DB >> 3567234

The learning process in biofeedback: is it feed-forward or feedback?

T G Dunn, S E Gillig, S E Ponsor, N Weil, S W Utz.   

Abstract

Twenty participants responded to inquiries about strategies used, and thoughts during, each of three electromyograph biofeedback sessions. The purpose of the study was to learn more about what individuals report doing during biofeedback and, specifically, to determine if individuals construct a response using feedback to sense subtle differences in muscle tension (feedback processes), or select a response from an existing repertoire using feedback primarily for confirmation (feed-forward processes). Protocol analyses found considerable support for feed-forward processes and little support for feedback processes. Such results are important because early reliance on feed-forward processes may result in limited control and limited transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3567234     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  3 in total

1.  Cognitive factors in biofeedback therapy.

Authors:  D Meichenbaum
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1976-06

2.  Application of biofeedback for the regulation of pain: a critical review.

Authors:  D C Turk; D H Meichenbaum; W H Berman
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The acquisition of autonomic control through biofeedback: the case against an afferent process and a two-process alternative.

Authors:  J M Lacroix
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

  3 in total
  14 in total

1.  Effects of Plyometric Training on Muscle-Activation Strategies and Performance in Female Athletes.

Authors:  Nicole J. Chimera; Kathleen A. Swanik; C Buz Swanik; Stephen J. Straub
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Effects of moveable platform training in preventing slip-induced falls in older adults.

Authors:  Prakriti Parijat; Thurmon E Lockhart
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 3.  Brains and Sprains: The Brain's Role in Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Authors:  Charles Buz Swanik
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  The role of the feedforward paradigm in cognitive psychology.

Authors:  Demis Basso; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-04-28

5.  Reactive muscle firing of anterior cruciate ligament-injured females during functional activities.

Authors:  C B Swanik; S M Lephart; J L Giraldo; R G Demont; F H Fu
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  EMG biofeedback and discriminative muscle control.

Authors:  A G Glaros; K Hanson
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1990-06

Review 7.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Tomas Ros; Luke Stoeckel; Sven Haller; Frank Scharnowski; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Maria Laura Blefari; Mohit Rana; Ethan Oblak; Niels Birbaumer; James Sulzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  The effect of instructions on cognitive strategies and performance in biofeedback.

Authors:  S W Utz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-06

9.  The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning.

Authors:  J Segreto
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-06

10.  Improving visual perception through neurofeedback.

Authors:  Frank Scharnowski; Chloe Hutton; Oliver Josephs; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.