Literature DB >> 2400794

EMG biofeedback and discriminative muscle control.

A G Glaros1, K Hanson.   

Abstract

The awareness model of biofeedback suggests that training teaches new skills or enhances performance at old skills, while the cognitive or feed-forward models suggest that biofeedback brings attention to the response of interest but does not actually increase task skill. In a test of the predictions made by these models, subjects were tested on one or more cross-modal matching tasks, provided brief training, and retested on the task(s). Thirty subjects participated in integer-matching tasks in which they were instructed to produce various levels of frontalis activity corresponding to the levels of a ratio scale. Forty-five subjects participated in a tone-matching task in which they tried to match their frontalis tension to the pitch of a tone. The results indicated that the groups receiving biofeedback training improved at the more difficult integer task and at the tone task. Subjects performed better on the integer tasks than at the tone task. Our findings suggest that an awareness model accounts for changes occurring during biofeedback training. However, an awareness model may be applicable only for tasks of moderate difficulty; for relatively easy tasks, a feed-forward model may be more appropriate. The clinical utility of cross-modal matching tasks is also described.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2400794     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  9 in total

1.  Problems and methods of psychophysics.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1958-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Subjective, clinical and EMG effects of biofeedback and splint treatment.

Authors:  T H Hijzen; J L Slangen; H C van Houweligen
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The learning process in biofeedback: is it feed-forward or feedback?

Authors:  T G Dunn; S E Gillig; S E Ponsor; N Weil; S W Utz
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1986-06

5.  Generalization of EMG biofeedback training.

Authors:  R Poppen; H B Hanson; S M Ip
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1988-09

6.  Placebo effects in biofeedback and self-perception of muscle tension.

Authors:  R Q Pollard; E S Katkin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Relaxation and subjective estimates of muscle tension: implications for a central efferent theory of muscle control.

Authors:  D W Stilson; I Matus; G Ball
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1980-03

8.  The relationship between muscle discrimination ability and response to relaxation training in three kinds of headaches.

Authors:  E B Blanchard; S E Jurish; F Andrasik; L H Epstein
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1981-12

9.  Muscle discrimination ability at three muscle sites in three headache groups.

Authors:  K A Appelbaum; E B Blanchard; F Andrasik
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1984-12
  9 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  The role of the feedforward paradigm in cognitive psychology.

Authors:  Demis Basso; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2006-04-28

2.  Awareness of physiological responding under stress and nonstress conditions in temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  A G Glaros
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1996-09

3.  The effect of instructions on cognitive strategies and performance in biofeedback.

Authors:  S W Utz
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-06

4.  The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning.

Authors:  J Segreto
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1995-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.