Literature DB >> 7662751

The role of EMG awareness in EMG biofeedback learning.

J Segreto1.   

Abstract

Underlying most research on biofeedback learning is a theoretical model of the processes involved. The current study tested a prediction from the Awareness Model: High initial EMG awareness should facilitate response control during EMG biofeedback training. Seventy-two undergraduates were assessed for forehead EMG awareness by asking them to produce target responses from 1.0 to 5.0 microV every 15 s for 16 trials. Based on this assessment, two groups (high and low awareness) were trained for 64 trials to produce these target levels with either EMG biofeedback, practice (no feedback), or noncontingent EMG feedback. A transfer task was identical to the initial assessment. During training, the biofeedback group deviated less from target than the practice and noncontingent groups. The biofeedback group was the only group to improve from initial EMG awareness activity. During transfer, only the low awareness biofeedback group remained below initial EMG awareness level. These findings can be interpreted in terms of the Two-Process Model.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7662751     DOI: 10.1007/bf01720971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul        ISSN: 0363-3586


  28 in total

1.  An experimental test of assumptions relating to the use of electromyographic biofeedback as a general relaxation training technique.

Authors:  A B Alexander
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Does the heart learn?

Authors:  D SHEARN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1956-03

4.  An instrument for producing deep muscle relaxation by means of analog information feedback.

Authors:  T H Budzynski; J M Stoyva
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

5.  Awareness during electromyographic biofeedback: of signal or process?

Authors:  H Staudenmayer; R A Kinsman
Journal:  Biofeedback Self Regul       Date:  1976-06

6.  Guidelines for human electromyographic research.

Authors:  A J Fridlund; J T Cacioppo
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Lack of correlation between frontalis EMG and either neck EMG or verbal ratings of tension.

Authors:  D I Shedivy; K M Kleinman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Experimenter and subject sex effects in the skin conductance response.

Authors:  L E Fisher; H Kotses
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Experimenter expectancy effects in frontal EMG conditioning.

Authors:  J Segreto-Bures; H Kotses
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Perception of gastric contractions and self-control of gastric motility.

Authors:  W E Whitehead; V M Drescher
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more
  1 in total

1.  Biofeedback in psychomotor training. Electrophysiological basis.

Authors:  O M Bazanova; E M Mernaya; M B Shtark
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-05-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.