Literature DB >> 35655791

How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review.

Hannah C Williamson1, Jerica X Bornstein1, Veronica Cantu1, Oyku Ciftci1, Krystan A Farnish1, Megan T Schouweiler1.   

Abstract

The social and behavioral sciences have long suffered from a lack of diversity in the samples used to study a broad array of phenomena. In an attempt to move toward a more contextually-informed approach, multiple subfields have undertaken meta-science studies of the diversity and inclusion of underrepresented groups in their body of literature. The current study is a systematic review of the field of relationship science aimed at examining the state of diversity and inclusion in this field. Relationship-focused papers published in five top relationship science journals from 2014-2018 (N = 559 articles, containing 771 unique studies) were reviewed. Studies were coded for research methods (e.g., sample source, dyadic data, observational data, experimental design) and sample characteristics (e.g., age, education, income, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation). Results indicate that the modal participant in a study of romantic relationships is 30 years old, White, American, middle-class, college educated, and involved in a different-sex, same-race relationship. Additionally, only 74 studies (10%) focused on traditionally underrepresented groups (i.e., non-White, low-income, and/or sexual and gender minorities). Findings underscore the need for greater inclusion of underrepresented groups to ensure the validity and credibility of relationship science. We conclude with general recommendations for the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  couples; diversity; intimate relationships; systematic review

Year:  2021        PMID: 35655791      PMCID: PMC9159543          DOI: 10.1177/02654075211053849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat        ISSN: 0265-4075


  28 in total

1.  Design and development of the European American values scale for Asian Americans.

Authors:  M M Wolfe; P H Yang; E C Wong; D R Atkinson
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2001-08

2.  Science, ethnicity, and bias: where have we gone wrong?

Authors:  S Sue
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1999-12

3.  Theory, not cultural context, will advance American psychology.

Authors:  Gerald J Haeffel; Erik D Thiessen; Matthew W Campbell; Michael P Kaschak; Nicole M McNeil
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2009-09

4.  [Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing and publication of scholarly work in medical journals].

Authors:  Qinghui Zhou
Journal:  Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi       Date:  2014-10

5.  Generic language in scientific communication.

Authors:  Jasmine M DeJesus; Maureen A Callanan; Graciela Solis; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evidence of Diverse Identities in a Large National Sample of Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents.

Authors:  Ryan J Watson; Christopher W Wheldon; Rebecca M Puhl
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2019-02-13

7.  Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study?

Authors:  Kalonji Nzinga; David N Rapp; Christopher Leatherwood; Matthew Easterday; Leoandra Onnie Rogers; Natalie Gallagher; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Race, Ethnicity, and the Changing Context of Childbearing in the United States.

Authors:  Megan M Sweeney; R Kelly Raley
Journal:  Annu Rev Sociol       Date:  2014-07

9.  Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral.

Authors:  Cydney H Dupree; Michael W Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 10.  A Call for Greater Attention to Culture in the Study of Brain and Development.

Authors:  Yang Qu; Nathan A Jorgensen; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-08-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Three tests of the Vulnerability-Stress-Adaptation Model: Independent prediction, mediation, and generalizability.

Authors:  Jaclyn M Ross; Teresa P Nguyen; Benjamin R Karney; Thomas N Bradbury
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-28

2.  Evidence of a Bidirectional Association Between Daily Sexual and Relationship Satisfaction That Is Moderated by Daily Stress.

Authors:  Charlene Zhao; James K McNulty; Jordan A Turner; Lindsey L Hicks; Andrea L Meltzer
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-09-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.