Literature DB >> 33651963

Psychological Science Is Not Race Neutral.

Cydney H Dupree1, Michael W Kraus1,2.   

Abstract

In their analysis in a previous issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science, Roberts and colleagues argued that the editors, authors, and participants throughout subfields of psychological science are overwhelmingly White. In this commentary, we consider some of the drivers and consequences of this racial inequality. Drawing on race scholarship from within and outside the field, we highlight three phenomena that create and maintain racial inequality in psychology: (a) racial ignorance, (b) threats to belonging, and (c) racial-progress narratives. We close by exploring steps that journals and authors can take to reduce racial inequality in our field, ending with an appeal to consider the experience of scholars of color in race scholarship and in psychological science more broadly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inequality; meta-science; psychology; race

Year:  2021        PMID: 33651963     DOI: 10.1177/1745691620979820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  2 in total

1.  How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review.

Authors:  Hannah C Williamson; Jerica X Bornstein; Veronica Cantu; Oyku Ciftci; Krystan A Farnish; Megan T Schouweiler
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2021-11-05

2.  Studying Ethnic-Racial Identity among White Youth: White Supremacy as a Developmental Context.

Authors:  Ursula Moffitt; Leoandra Onnie Rogers
Journal:  J Res Adolesc       Date:  2022-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.