| Literature DB >> 35643468 |
Dagoberto Torres-Alvarez1,2, Angel León-Buitimea1,2, Alonso Albalate-Ramírez1,3, Pasiano Rivas-García1,3, Emanuel Hernández-Núñez4,5, José Rubén Morones-Ramírez6,7.
Abstract
Low-cost substrates are an exciting alternative for bioprocesses; however, their complexity can affect microorganism metabolism with non-desirable outcomes. This work evaluated banana peel extract (BPE) as a growth medium compared to commercial Yeast-Malt (YM) broth in the native and non-conventional yeast Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL-001L. The production of carotenoids, fatty acids, and exopolysaccharides (EPS) was also analyzed. Biomass concentration (3.9 g/L) and growth rate (0.069 g/h) of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL-001L were obtained at 200 g/L of BPE. Yields per gram of dry biomass for carotenoids (317 µg/g) and fatty acids (0.55 g/g) showed the best results in 150 g/L of BPE, while 298 µg/g and 0.46 mg/g, respectively, were obtained in the YM broth. The highest yield of EPS was observed in 50 g/L of BPE, a two-fold increase (160.1 mg/g) compared to the YM broth (76.3 mg/g). The fatty acid characterization showed that 100 g/L of BPE produced 400% more unsaturated compounds (e.g., oleic and ricinoleic acid) than the YM broth. Altogether, these results indicate that BPE is a suitable medium for producing high-value products with potential industrial applications.Entities:
Keywords: Banana peel; Carotenoids; Exopolysaccharide; Fatty acids; Rhodotorula mucilaginosa
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35643468 PMCID: PMC9148461 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-022-01834-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 6.352
Results of compositional analysis performed on BPE
| Parameter | Sample 1 | Sample 2 | Sample 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture (%) | 89.79 ± 0.08 | 89.66 ± 1.14 | 90.14 ± 0.9 |
| Total solids (%) | 10.21 ± 0.08 | 10.34 ± 1.14 | 8.97 ± 0.9 |
| Volatile solids (%db) | 88.13 ± 0.91 | 87.49 ± 1.65 | 87.52 ± 1.53 |
| Ash (%db) | 11.87 ± 0.91 | 12.51 ± 1.65 | 12.48 ± 1.53 |
| Total nitrogen (%db) | 2.66 ± 0.002 | 2.65 ± 0.002 | 2.63 ± 0.0 |
| Total nitrogen (g/L) | 2.71 ± 0.002 | 2.74 ± 0.002 | 2.06 ± 0.0 |
db dry biomass
Fig. 1Growth kinetics and reducing sugar consumption of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL 001L in YM broth and 100 g/L BPE medium. (Circles correspond to growth OD, and triangles correspond to the concentration of reducing sugars). Each point represents the mean ± SD, n = 3 a p-value < 0.05 was statistically significant (*) between treatments and control
Growth of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL 001L in different BPE concentrations compared with YM broth
| Sample | Biomass concentration | Growth rate (h−1) | Duplication time (h) | Reducing sugars consumption (g/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OD | Biomass g/L | ||||
| YM | 11.47 ± 0.392a | 5.3 ± 0.187a | 0.069a | 10.05 ± 0.082a | 7.08 ± 0.37a |
| BPE (g/L) | |||||
| 50 | 5.44 ± 0.26c | 2.7 ± 0.131c | 0.052c | 13.43 ± 0.019c | 1.69 ± 0.028c |
| 100 | 6.82 ± 0.281b | 3.6 ± 0.147b | 0.059b | 11.74 ± 0.05b | 4.01 ± 0.022b |
| 150 | 6.87 ± 0.227b | 3.3 ± 0.117b | 0.066a | 10.44 ± 0.074a | 5.79 ± 0.109b |
| 200 | 7.32 ± 0.202b | 3.9 ± 0.108b | 0.069a | 10.11 ± 0.071a | 7.75 ± 0.167a |
Each point represents the mean ± SD, n = 3. The same letter represents no significant difference (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Production of carotenoids, exopolysaccharide (EPS), and fatty acids by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL 001L in YM broth and BPE after 5 days of growth: a Concentration (mg/L or g/L), b Content (mg product/g biomass or mg product/g biomass). Each bar represents the mean ± SD, n = 3. The same letters did not differ significantly at p < 0.05
Carotenoids yield per dry biomass in different R. mucilaginosa strains
| Microorganism | Substratea | Substrate concentration (g/L) | Carotenoid yield (µg/g) | Additional details | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banana peel extract | 50 | 268 ± 19 | This study | ||
| 100 | 291 ± 25 | ||||
| 150 | 317 ± 16 | ||||
| 200 | 279 ± 24 | ||||
| Glucose | 40 | 62.50 ± 28.20 | Potato extract with 5% salt (salt stress) | [ | |
| Glucose + whey | 40 + 7 | 422.30 ± 14.88 | |||
| Glucose + potato extract | 40 + 7 | 1535.60 ± 156.52 | |||
| YPD + potato wastewater + Glycerol | Glycerol: 30 | 110 | Glycerol above 100 g/L cause inhibition | [ | |
| Glycerol: 50 | 110 | ||||
| Alperujo water | 100% | 800 | Alperujo water as only nutrients source | [ | |
| Alperujo extract | 30 | 700 | |||
| R. | Potato wastewater + glycerol | Glycerol: 30 | 88 ± 9 | Cultured at 20 °C | [ |
| R. | Molasses sucrose | 20 | 21,200 | [ | |
| Whey lactose | 13.2 | 35,000 | |||
| R. | Onion peel + mung bean husk | Sugar content 70.7 | 710.33 ± 27.87 | Aqueos extract | [ |
| Potato skin + potato pods | Sugar content 30.8 | 538.81 ± 18.36 | |||
| Onion peel + mung bean husk | Sugar content 79.99 | 717.82 ± 27.64 | Acidic extract | ||
| Potato skin + potato pods | Sugar content 62.1 | 545.13 ± 28.77 | |||
| R. | Waste extract | Sugar content 14 | 1250 | C/N ratio adjusted to 20:1 in waste extract | [ |
| Rice straw | Sugar content 5 | 441.17 |
YPD yeast extract–peptone–dextrose medium
aMain carbon source
EPS concentration in different R. mucilaginosa strains
| Microorganism | Growth media | Carbon source (g/L) | EPS concentration (g/L) | Potential application | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banana peel extract | 50 | 0.432 ± 0.019 | Antimicrobial | This study | |
| 100 | 0.417 ± 0.023 | ||||
| 150 | 0.443 ± 0.018 | ||||
| 200 | 0.45 ± 0.021 | ||||
| YPD medium | Glucose: 20 | 6.2 | Antioxidation and anti-carcinoma activity | [ | |
| PDB medium | Glucose: 20 | 3.328 | Removal of heavy metals | [ | |
| YPD medium | Glucose: 50 Yeast extract: 10 | 15.1 | Immunomodulatory activity | [ | |
| YPG medium | Peptone: 20 Glycerol: 25 | 28.5 | Antioxidation and high molecular weight | [ | |
| PDB medium | Glucose: 20 | 9.74 | Emulsifying | [ |
Lipids yield per dry biomass in different R. mucilaginosa strains
| Microorganism | Substratea | Substrate concentration (g/L) | Yield lipids (mg/g) | Additional details | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banana peel extract | 50 | 483 ± 20 | This study | ||
| 100 | 511 ± 21 | ||||
| 150 | 553 ± 10 | ||||
| 200 | 538 ± 21 | ||||
| Sea water + glycerol | Glycerol: 60 | 650 | Mutated strain for high lipid content | [ | |
| YPD + potato wastewater + glycerol | Glycerol: 30 | 95 ± 11 | Cultured at 20 °C | [ | |
| Glycerol | 50 | 102 | Peptone 20 g/L and yeast extract 10 g/L | [ | |
| Durian peel | 1000 g | 162 | Hydrolysate resuspended in water | [ | |
| Wheat bran | Reducing sugars: 60 | 370 | Acid hydrosilated in 4 L reactor | [ | |
| Crude glycerol + yeast extract | Glycerol: 50 Yeast extract: 5 | 600 | C/N ratio of 65 | [ | |
| Peptone + malt extract | 2.036 + 1.515 | 250 | [ |
YPD yeast extract–peptone–dextrose medium
aMain carbon source
Profile of fatty acids in Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL 001L in YM broth and BPE 100 g/L
| Fatty acid | BPE 100 g/L | Yeast-Malt |
|---|---|---|
| Myristic acid (14:0) | 5.6% | 6.4% |
| Palmitic acid (16:0) | 34.7% | 40.8% |
| Stearic acid (18:0) | 28.2% | 41.7% |
| Oleic acid (18:1) | 21% | 6.8% |
| Ricinoleic acid (18:1) | 6.5% | < 1% |
| Nonadecanoic acid (19:0) | 4% | < 5% |