| Literature DB >> 29335484 |
Augusto Vazquez-Rodriguez1,2, Ximena G Vasto-Anzaldo3, Daniel Barboza Perez1,2, Eduardo Vázquez-Garza4,5, Héctor Chapoy-Villanueva4,5, Gerardo García-Rivas4,5, Javier A Garza-Cervantes1, Jéssica J Gómez-Lugo1,2, Alma Elizabeth Gomez-Loredo1,2, Maria Teresa Garza Gonzalez1,2, Xristo Zarate1,2, Jose Ruben Morones-Ramirez6,7.
Abstract
Bacterial species are able to colonize and establish communities in biotic and abiotic surfaces. Moreover, within the past five decades, incidence of bacterial strains resistant to currently used antibiotics has increased dramatically. This has led to diverse health issues and economical losses for different industries. Therefore, there is a latent need to develop new and more efficient antimicrobials. This work reports an increased production of an exopolysaccharide in a nativeEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29335484 PMCID: PMC5768876 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17908-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Composition of the different tested to grow R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L.
| Yeast Mold Media (YM) | Yeast Mold Mineral Media (YMM) | Yeast Mold Mineral Media with added Zn (YMMZ) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 5 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
|
| 20 |
| 20 |
| 20 |
|
| 3 |
| 1 |
| 1 |
|
| 5 |
| 0.1 |
| 0.1 |
|
| 0.5 |
| 0.5 | ||
|
| 0.1 |
| 0.1 | ||
|
| 2 |
| 2 | ||
|
| 0.05 | ||||
Figure 1EPS production in different media formulations. EPS production at 72 h, when R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L is grown in YM media, Mineral Media and Mineral Media + Zn. Mean + − SD, n = 3 error bars are reported.
Figure 2EPS biosynthesis as a function of cellular growth. (A) Cell growth kinetics for 96 h. (B) EPS production kinetics for 96 h. Mean + − SD, n = 3 error bars are reported.
Figure 3EPS biosynthesis in R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L when co-cultured at low, medium and high levels of E. coli initial inoculum and glucose concentration in the media. EPS production after 72 h of co-culture is reported as a percentage increase compared to EPS production when R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L is grown alone. Mean + − SD, n = 3 error bars are reported. A (*) above the bar represents a P < 0.05 between groups at same glucose concentration. A (**) above the bars represent a P < 0.05 between groups at same initial E. coli inoculum.
Figure 4Chemical and Physical Properties of the EPS biosynthesized by R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L. The data show chemical and physical analysis of the EPS produced by Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UANL-001L. (a) FTIR of the EPS with the different peaks highlighted and tagged with the chemical group corresponding to each specific wavenumber. (b) Percentage of carbohydrates present in the EPS. (c) C, O, H, N, S and ashes percentage composition of the exopolysaccharides. (d) GC-MS spectrum of EPS produced by R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L, with all of the monosugars detected labeled. (e) Composition of each of the monosugars present in the EPS. (f) SEM image showing morphology of EPS.
Figure 5Antibiofilm Activity of the EPS biosynthesized by R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L. Biofilm formation is measured after the treatment of bacterial cultures with a range of EPS concentrations. The results correspond to (a) S. aureus ATCC 6538, (b) P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and (c) E.coli ATCC 11229. Mean + − SD, n = 3 error bars are reported. A (*) above the bar represents a P < 0.05 between treatments and the control. A (**) above the bars represent a P < 0.05 between groups of treatments.
Figure 6Antimicrobial Activity of the EPS biosynthesized by R. mucilaginosa UANL-001L. Microbial growth in liquid culture is measured after the treatment of bacterial cultures with a range of EPS concentrations. The results correspond to (a) S. aureus ATCC 6538, (b) P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and (c) E.coli ATCC 11229. Mean + − SD, n = 3 error bars are reported. A (*) above the bar represents a P < 0.05 between treatments and the control. A (**) above the bars represent a P < 0.05 between groups of treatments.
Figure 7Permeability assay of E. coli and P. aeruginosa treated with EPS. Fluorescence micrographs of PI stained bacteria. (a) Control untreated E. coli; (b) E. coli treated with 2500 ppm of EPS; (c) Control untreated P. aeruginosa; (d) P. aeruginosa treated with 2500 ppm of EPS.
Figure 8A dose range of 0.1–5000 µg /mL EPS does not induce apoptosis or necrosis after 24 hrs. There were no differences in the percentage of induction of necrosis or apoptotic in a dose dependent setting. (a) Viable cells, (b) Apoptotic cells and c) Necrotic cells. Results are means ± S.D. n = 3–6, p values for viability p = 0.83, apoptosis p = 0.6 and necrosis p = 0.8.
Figure 9Murine Model Shows No Cytotoxicity of EPS. There were no statistical differences between control and the treated mice in: (a) Body Weight (p = 0.82); (b) Erythrocytes (p = 0.21); (c) Hematocrit (p = 0.23); (d) Leukocytes (p = 39) Results are means ± S.D, n = 3.