| Literature DB >> 35625986 |
Keigo Machida1, Stanley M Tahara1.
Abstract
Cancer contains tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs) that are resistant to therapies. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence has increased twice over the past few decades, while the incidence of other cancer types has trended downward globally. Therefore, an understanding of HCC development and therapy resistance mechanisms is needed for this incurable malignancy. This review article describes links between immunotherapies and microbiota in tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs), which have stem cell characteristics with self-renewal ability and express pluripotency transcription factors such as NANOG, SOX2, and OCT4. This review discusses (1) how immunotherapies fail and (2) how gut dysbiosis inhibits immunotherapy efficacy. Gut dysbiosis promotes resistance to immunotherapies by breaking gut immune tolerance and activating suppressor immune cells. Unfortunately, this leads to incurable recurrence/metastasis development. Personalized medicine approaches targeting these mechanisms of TIC/metastasis-initiating cells are emerging targets for HCC immunotherapy and microbiota modulation therapy.Entities:
Keywords: cancer stem cell (CSC); hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); immunotherapy; tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625986 PMCID: PMC9139909 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
First line therapy (FDA-approved and Phase III investigations in advanced HCC).
| Therapy | Target | OR (HR) | Note | Clinical Phases [ | Reference and |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PD-L1, VEGF | 0.58 (HR 0.42–0.79) | OS > 17 months, normalizes tumor vasculature to starve tumors | Approved, III | NCT03434379 [ |
|
| PD-1 | 0.85 (0.72–1.02) | Well-tolerated in advanced HCC | Approved, III (sorafenib) | NCT02576509 [ |
|
| FGFR1-4, VEGFR1-3, RET, c-KIT and PDGFRα | 0.85 (0.72–1.02) | Safety and tolerability profiles | Approved, III non-inferiority trial | NCT01761266 [ |
|
| EGFR + VEGFR1-3, RET, KIT PDGFRa/b | 0.92 (0.78–1.11) | Adding erlotinib to sorafenib did not improve survival | III | NCT0901901 [ |
|
| FGFR | 1.05 (0.90–1.22) | TTP and ORR favored linifanib | III | [ |
|
| VEGFR | 1.07 (0.94–1.23) | OS, TTP, ORR, DCR, and mRECIST | III | NCT00858871 [ |
| Radiation | 1.12 (0.88–1.42) | SIRveNIB trial, locoregional selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) | III (approved for colon cancer) | NCT01135056 [ | |
|
| Radiation | 1.15 (0.94–1.41) | Sorafenib vs. Radioembolization in Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH) trial, yttrium-90 (Y-90) resin microspheres | III | [ |
|
| |||||
|
| VEGFR1-3, RET, KIT PDGFRa/b. FGFR1/2. Raf | Regorafenib 0.63 | Approved | NCT01774344 [ | |
|
| VEGFR2 | 0.71 (0.53–0.95) | In advanced HCC with AFP > 400 ng/mL | Approved | NCT02435433 |
|
| EGFR2, MET, RON, RET, TIE2, TAMkinases | 0.76 (0.63–0.92) | CELESTIAL trial, HCC progression on prior sorafenib | Approved | NCT01908426 [ |
|
| PD-1 | 0.78 (0.61–0.99) | 1 Q3W + BSC 8.3% | Approved | NCT02702401 [ |
|
| PD-1 | 0.89 (0.69–1.15) | BRISK-FL study | III | NCT00858871 [ |
|
| MET | 0.97 (0.75–1.25) | METIV-HCC | III | NCT01755767 [ |
|
| mTOR (mTORC1 complex) | 1.95 (0.86–1.27) | EVOLVE-1 | III | NCT01035229 [ |
|
| VEGFR1-3, Raf, PDGFRb, KIT, Fit-3 | 0.69 (0.55 to 0.87) | Sorafenib HCC Assessment Randomized Protocol (SHARP) trial | Approved | NCT00105443 [ |
|
| PD-1 and CTLA-4 | Neoadjuvant | II | NCT03222076 | |
* Current systemic therapies for HCC: approved in unselected populations [40].
Therapeutic targets for iCCA [49,75].
| Therapy | Target | OR (HR) | Prevalence in iCCA | Note | Clinical Phases [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramucirumab | VEGFR2 | 0.710 (0·531–0·949) | AFP > 400 ng/mL, 2nd line, REACH-2 | NCT01140347 [ | |
| Pemigatinib | FGFR2 fusion (EGFR G179A. exon18) | 11–15% | FIGHT-302, Comparator (Gemcitabine + cisplatin) | NCT03656536 [ | |
| Fisogatinib (BLU-554), Ivosidenib | IDH1 mutation | 5–13% | NCT02989857, NCT02273739 [ | ||
| MET amplification | 2–6% | ||||
| 2–3% | MSI high TMB high | ||||
| FGFR2 V564F, N564 | |||||
| Dabrafenib (BRAFi) + Trametinib (MEFi) | BRAF600E gain of | 5% (BRAF) | |||
| Larotrectinib | TRK Fusion | TRK fusion–positive cancer | ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02122913, NCT02637687, and NCT02576431 [ | ||
| Futibatinib (TAS-120) | irreversible FGFR1–4 | Comparator (Gemcitabine + cisplatin) | III, NCT04093362 [ | ||
| Infigratinib (BGJ398) | FGFR1–3 | Comparator (Gemcitabine + cisplatin) | III, NCT03773302 | ||
| Derazantinib (ARQ-087) | pan-FGFR | III, NCT03230318 |
Figure 1Intestinal microbiota and bacterial products. (A) Nine hallmarks of intestinal microbiota effects on host. (B) Summary of intestinal microbiota bacterial products, including bacterial toxins and their effects on the host.
Figure 2Probiotics and prebiotics fermented by beneficial bacteria for immune checkpoint inhibitors. (A) Bacterial species that are positively associated with PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade therapy are summarized. Responders for immunotherapy have specific gut microbiota. Bacteria species are summarized in a table from the literature [20,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. (B) Bacterial species and prebiotics that are positively associated with PD-1 and PD-L1 blockade therapy are summarized.
Figure 3TLR2 is necessary to alleviate the inflammatory response. Fructo-oligosaccharide and inulin are considered as prebiotics, affecting IECs to be hyporesponsive to activation of NF-κB and MAPK induced by pathogens. NF-κB and MAPK reduce the inflammatory response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS).