| Literature DB >> 35625811 |
Louis Lauwerys1, Evelien Smits2,3, Tim Van den Wyngaert1,4, Filipe Elvas1.
Abstract
Cancer immunotherapy is an evolving and promising cancer treatment that takes advantage of the body's immune system to yield effective tumor elimination. Importantly, immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, resulting in remarkable tumor responses and improvements in patient survival. However, despite impressive tumor effects and extended patient survival, only a small proportion of patients respond, and others can develop immune-related adverse events associated with these therapies, which are associated with considerable costs. Therefore, strategies to increase the proportion of patients gaining a benefit from these treatments and/or increasing the durability of immune-mediated tumor response are still urgently needed. Currently, measurement of blood or tissue biomarkers has demonstrated sampling limitations, due to intrinsic tumor heterogeneity and the latter being invasive. In addition, the unique response patterns of these therapies are not adequately captured by conventional imaging modalities. Consequently, non-invasive, sensitive, and quantitative molecular imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using specific radiotracers, have been increasingly used for longitudinal whole-body monitoring of immune responses. Immunotherapies rely on the effector function of CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells (NK) at tumor lesions; therefore, the monitoring of these cytotoxic immune cells is of value for therapy response assessment. Different immune cell targets have been investigated as surrogate markers of response to immunotherapy, which motivated the development of multiple imaging agents. In this review, the targets and radiotracers being investigated for monitoring the functional status of immune effector cells are summarized, and their use for imaging of immune-related responses are reviewed along their limitations and pitfalls, of which multiple have already been translated to the clinic. Finally, emerging effector immune cell imaging strategies and future directions are provided.Entities:
Keywords: T cell imaging; activation markers; biomarkers; cell imaging; exhaustion markers; immunotherapy; in vivo imaging; molecular imaging; oncology; positron emission tomography
Year: 2022 PMID: 35625811 PMCID: PMC9139020 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10051074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Figure 1Schematic illustration representing the different methods to image immune cells with PET and SPECT radiopharmaceuticals. (A) direct ex vivo labelling, (B) receptor gene imaging and (C) direct in vivo targeting. Created with Biorender.com.
Tracers and targets of the direct ex vivo labelling method used in adoptive cell transfer.
| Direct Ex Vivo Labelling | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Tracer | Type | Stage |
| Metabolic tracer | [18F]FDG | Small molecule [ | Clinical |
| Intracellular trapping | [89Zr]Zr-oxine | Small molecule [ | Clinical |
| Intracellular trapping | [111In]In-oxine | Small molecule [ | Clinical |
| Cell surface proteins | [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Bz-NCS | Small molecule [ | Preclinical |
| Intracellular trapping | [64Cu]Cu-PTSM | Small molecule [ | Preclinical |
Tracers and targets of the reporter gene method used in adoptive cell transfer.
| Reporter Gene Strategy | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reporter Gene | Tracer | Type | Stage |
|
| [18F]FHBG | Small molecule [ | Clinical (NCT00185848) |
| [18F]FIAU | Small molecule [ | Preclinical | |
| [18F]FEAU | Small molecule [ | Preclinical | |
| [18F]FHPG | Small molecule [ | Preclinical | |
| [18F]FLT | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT00585741) | |
| [18F]FMAU | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT04752267) | |
| [124I]FIAU | Small molecule [ | Clinical (NCT01337466) | |
|
| [18F]FEAU | Small molecule [ | Preclinical |
| [124I]FIAU | Small molecule [ | Clinical (NCT01337466) | |
| L-[18F]FMAU | Small molecule [ | Preclinical | |
| Sodium iodide symporter ( | [99mTc]pertechnate | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT04563780) |
| [18F]FTB | Small molecule [ | Preclinical | |
| Somatostatin receptor 2 ( | [18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT04552847) |
| [68Ga]Ga-DOTATOC | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT02359500) | |
| Norepinephrine transporter ( | [18F]MFBG | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT04258592) |
| [124I]MIBG | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT01583842) | |
|
| [11C]TMP | Small molecule [ | Preclinical |
| [18F]F-TMP | Small molecule [ | Clinical (NCT04263792) | |
|
| [18F]DCFPyL | ABP [ | Clinical (NCT03424525) |
| [18F]F-DCFBC | Small molecule [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT01815515) | |
| [18F]PSMA-1007 | peptide [ | Clinical (e.g., NCT04487847) | |
Tracers and targets of the direct in vivo labelling method.
| Direct In Vivo Labelling | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Tracer | Type | Stage |
| CD8 | [89Zr]Zr-PEG20-x118-VHH | Heavy chain only IgG (VHH) [ | Preclinical |
| [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-2.43 | Minibody (Mb) [ | Preclinical | |
| [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-YTS169 | Mb [ | Preclinical | |
| [89Zr]Zr-malDFO-169 | Mb [ | Preclinical | |
| [89Zr]Zr-malDFO-2.43 | Bivalent antibody fragment (cDb) [ | Preclinical | |
| [89Zr]Zr-DFO-IAB22M2C | Mb [ | Clinical (NCT03802123, NCT03107663, NCT04955262) | |
| VLA-4 | [64Cu]Cu-LLP2A | Peptide [ | Preclinical |
| TCR | [89Zr]Zr-DFO-aTCRmu-F(ab’)2 | Antibody (Ab) [ | Preclinical |
| [64Cu]Cu-DOTA-cOVA-TCR | mAb [ | Preclinical | |
| HLA-DR | 64Cu-labelled VHH | VHH [ | Preclinical |
| NCAM (=CD56) (NK cells) | 99mTc-labelled anti-CD56 mAb | mAb [ | preclinical |
Figure 2Tracers that image cytotoxic immune cells’ functional state. Created with BioRender.com.