Literature DB >> 32444375

Imaging the Cancer Immune Environment and Its Response to Pharmacologic Intervention, Part 1: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Amir Iravani1,2,3, Rodney J Hicks4,2.   

Abstract

Immunotherapy agents are now entering the clinic in a wide array of malignancies and have provided a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium. These agents enhance the global immune response by modulating the tumor microenvironment but can lead to unconventional patterns of response, challenging the conceptual framework that imaging is a robust surrogate for therapeutic efficacy. There is also increasing evidence that an effective antitumor response requires a systemic immune response in primary and secondary lymphoid tissues. However, an enhanced systemic immune response can lead to disruption of immunologic hemostasis in healthy tissues, causing adverse events. Better understanding of the complex interplay between tumoral and systemic immune response has been provided through tissue and liquid biopsy. However, the applicability of these methods is constrained by the biologic, spatial, and temporal heterogeneity of the processes involved. There is a growing interest in molecular imaging of cell-specific lineage markers of the immune system using biomolecules. However, the ongoing role of the more widely available 18F-FDG PET/CT for response assessment is being recognized through ongoing refinement of interpretative guidelines and emerging evidence. These noninvasive methods provide insights into the biologic basis of the global immune response to maximize potential therapeutic benefit. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current status of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the monitoring of tumoral and systemic immune response. In a companion review, the role of other imaging probes that might complement 18F-FDG PET/CT will be discussed.
© 2020 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-FDG PET/CT; immune response; immunotherapy; molecular imaging; therapeutic monitoring

Year:  2020        PMID: 32444375     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.234278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

1.  A Machine Learning Model Based on PET/CT Radiomics and Clinical Characteristics Predicts Tumor Immune Profiles in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Multicohort Study.

Authors:  Haipeng Tong; Jinju Sun; Jingqin Fang; Mi Zhang; Huan Liu; Renxiang Xia; Weicheng Zhou; Kaijun Liu; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 8.786

2.  Noninvasive evaluation of tumor immune microenvironment in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma using metabolic parameter from preoperative 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Caixia Wu; Yonggang Cui; Jumei Liu; Linlin Ma; Yan Xiong; Yanqing Gong; Yanyan Zhao; Xi Zhang; Silu Chen; Qun He; Jianhua Zhang; Meng Liu; Yan Fan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Interim [18F]FDG PET/CT can predict response to anti-PD-1 treatment in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Leyun Pan; Dimitrios Papamichail; Uwe Haberkorn; Jessica C Hassel; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Nanobodies for Medical Imaging: About Ready for Prime Time?

Authors:  Léa Berland; Lauren Kim; Omar Abousaway; Andrea Mines; Shruti Mishra; Louise Clark; Paul Hofman; Mohammad Rashidian
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-04-26

5.  Use of Fluoro-[18F]-Deoxy-2-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict Immunotherapy Treatment Response in Patients With Squamous Cell Oral Cavity Cancers.

Authors:  Hina Shah; Yating Wang; Su-Chun Cheng; Lauren Gunasti; Yu-Hui Chen; Ana Lako; Jeffrey Guenette; Scott Rodig; Vickie Y Jo; Ravindra Uppaluri; Robert Haddad; Jonathan D Schoenfeld; Heather A Jacene
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  The Future of Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment and Surveillance: A Systemic Review on Immunotherapy and Immuno-PET Radiotracers.

Authors:  Virginia Liberini; Riccardo Laudicella; Martina Capozza; Martin W Huellner; Irene A Burger; Sergio Baldari; Enzo Terreno; Désirée Deandreis
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-11       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 7.  Noninvasive Imaging of Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Omar Abousaway; Taha Rakhshandehroo; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Moritz F Kircher; Mohammad Rashidian
Journal:  Nanotheranostics       Date:  2021-01-01

8.  First-Line Pembrolizumab Mono- or Combination Therapy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Baseline Metabolic Biomarkers Predict Outcomes.

Authors:  David Lang; Linda Ritzberger; Vanessa Rambousek; Andreas Horner; Romana Wass; Kaveh Akbari; Bernhard Kaiser; Jürgen Kronbichler; Bernd Lamprecht; Michael Gabriel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Malignancy Rate of Indeterminate Findings on FDG-PET/CT in Cutaneous Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Ken Kudura; Florentia Dimitriou; Daniela Mihic-Probst; Urs J Muehlematter; Tim Kutzker; Lucas Basler; Robert Förster; Reinhard Dummer; Joanna Mangana; Lars Husmann; Irene A Burger; Michael Christoph Kreissl
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-15

10.  Preclinical Evaluation of 89Zr-Df-IAB22M2C PET as an Imaging Biomarker for the Development of the GUCY2C-CD3 Bispecific PF-07062119 as a T Cell Engaging Therapy.

Authors:  Kevin P Maresca; Jianqing Chen; Divya Mathur; Anand Giddabasappa; Adam Root; Jatin Narula; Lindsay King; David Schaer; Jonathan Golas; Keith Kobylarz; Edward Rosfjord; Edmund Keliher; Laigao Chen; Sripad Ram; Eve H Pickering; James S Hardwick; Paul A Rejto; Amira Hussein; Ohad Ilovich; Kevin Staton; Ian Wilson; Timothy J McCarthy
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.