Literature DB >> 30755811

Antibody and fragment-based PET imaging of CTLA-4+ T-cells in humanized mouse models.

Emily B Ehlerding1, Hye Jin Lee2, Dawei Jiang3,4, Carolina A Ferreira5, Christopher D Zahm6, Peng Huang4, Jonathan W Engle1, Douglas G McNeel6,7, Weibo Cai1,2,3,5,6.   

Abstract

Imaging of immunotherapy targets using positron emission tomography (PET) can allow for noninvasive monitoring of their dynamic expression and may allow for patient stratification in the future. Therefore, two tracers targeting CTLA-4, one a full antibody and the other a F(ab')2 fragment, were radiolabeled with 64Cu and validated in humanized mouse models. Ipilimumab was digested to develop ipilimumab-F(ab')2, and both the intact antibody and the fragment were conjugated with NOTA to chelate 64Cu for PET. The tracers were administered to both control NBSGW mice and humanized mice (PBL mice, engrafted with human peripheral blood lymphocytes), and PET was conducted out to 48 h post-injection. PET region-of-interest analysis, ex vivo biodistribution studies, and tissue staining were used to confirm that the tracers specifically accumulated in CTLA-4+ tissues. Following injection of tracers (n = 3-5 per group), specific uptake was noted in the salivary gland tissues of the humanized mice. This uptake, a result of graft-versus-host disease onset, was proven to be due to human T-cells through staining of the tissues for human CD3 and CTLA-4. 64Cu-NOTA-ipilimumab demonstrated the highest absolute uptake in the salivary glands of PBL mice, peaking at 7.00 ± 2.19 %ID/g. In contrast, 64Cu-NOTA-ipilimumab-F(ab')2 uptake was 2.40 ± 0.86 %ID/g at the same time point. However, the F(ab')2 agent cleared from circulation more quickly than the intact antibody, providing higher salivary gland-to-blood ratios, which reached 1.78 ± 0.72 at 48 h post-injection, compared to 64Cu-NOTA-ipilimumab at 1.19 ± 0.49. Uptake of the tracers in the salivary glands of control mice, and the nonspecific tracer in the PBL mice, was lower at all time points as well. PET imaging with both 64Cu-NOTA-ipilimumab and 64Cu-NOTA-ipilimumab-F(ab')2 was able to localize CTLA-4+ tissues. These tracers may thus help elucidate the mechanisms of response to CTLA-4-targeted checkpoint immunotherapy treatments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  64Cu; Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4); antibody fragment; checkpoint immunotherapy; humanized mice; ipilimumab; positron emission tomography (PET)

Year:  2019        PMID: 30755811      PMCID: PMC6356917     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  24 in total

1.  Summary From the First Kidney Cancer Research Summit, September 12-13, 2019: A Focus on Translational Research.

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Michael B Atkins; Ziad Bakouny; Maria I Carlo; Charles G Drake; Eric Jonasch; Payal Kapur; Bryan Lewis; W Marston Linehan; Michael J Mitchell; Sumanta K Pal; Kevin Pels; Susan Poteat; W Kimryn Rathmell; Brian I Rini; Sabina Signoretti; Nizar Tannir; Robert Uzzo; Christopher G Wood; Hans J Hammers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Immune Checkpoint Imaging in Oncology: A Game Changer Toward Personalized Immunotherapy?

Authors:  Susanne Lütje; Georg Feldmann; Markus Essler; Peter Brossart; Ralph A Bundschuh
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  ImmunoPET imaging of CD38 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma using 64Cu-labeled daratumumab.

Authors:  Shiyong Li; Christopher G England; Emily B Ehlerding; Christopher J Kutyreff; Jonathan W Engle; Dawei Jiang; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  ImmunoPET Imaging of TIM-3 in Murine Melanoma Models.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Dawei Jiang; Hye Jin Lee; Jonathan W Engle; Hisaya Akiba; Jianjun Liu; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2020-04-17

5.  Immuno-PET Monitoring of Lymphocytes Using the CD8-Specific Antibody REGN5054.

Authors:  Dangshe Ma; Jessica R Kirshner; Richard Tavaré; Makenzie Danton; Jason T Giurleo; Sosina Makonnen; Carlos Hickey; Tomas C Arnold; Marcus P Kelly; Fanny Fredriksson; Karina Bruestle; Aynur Hermann; Erica Ullman; Kurt H Edelmann; Terra Potocky; Drew Dudgeon; Nikunj B Bhatt; Mikhail Doubrovin; Thomas Barry; Christos A Kyratsous; Cagan Gurer; Naxin Tu; Hans Gartner; Andrew Murphy; Lynn E Macdonald; Jon Popke; Akiva Mintz; Adam Griesemer; William C Olson; Gavin Thurston
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 12.020

6.  Radiopharmaceuticals as Novel Immune System Tracers.

Authors:  Natalie A Ridge; Anne Rajkumar-Calkins; Stephanie O Dudzinski; Austin N Kirschner; Neil B Newman
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 7.  Molecular imaging for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  E A Lim; C G Drake; A Mintz
Journal:  Immunooncol Technol       Date:  2020-03-27

Review 8.  Imaging for Response Assessment in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Anna G Sorace; Asser A Elkassem; Samuel J Galgano; Suzanne E Lapi; Benjamin M Larimer; Savannah C Partridge; C Chad Quarles; Kirsten Reeves; Tiara S Napier; Patrick N Song; Thomas E Yankeelov; Stefanie Woodard; Andrew D Smith
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  ImmunoPET: Concept, Design, and Applications.

Authors:  Weijun Wei; Zachary T Rosenkrans; Jianjun Liu; Gang Huang; Quan-Yong Luo; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  Therapeutic Response Assessment of High-Grade Gliomas During Early-Phase Drug Development in the Era of Molecular and Immunotherapies.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Patrick Y Wen; Timothy F Cloughesy
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct 01       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.