| Literature DB >> 28744323 |
Nahid Yusufi1, Sabine Mall2,3, Henrique de Oliveira Bianchi2, Katja Steiger4,5, Sybille Reder1, Richard Klar2, Stefan Audehm2, Mona Mustafa1, Stephan Nekolla1, Christian Peschel2,3, Markus Schwaiger1,3, Angela M Krackhardt2,3, Calogero D'Alessandria1.
Abstract
A number of different technologies have been developed to monitor in vivo the distribution of gene-modified T cells used in immunotherapy. Nevertheless, in-depth characterization of novel approaches with respect to sensitivity and clinical applicability are so far missing. We have previously described a novel method to track engineered human T cells in tumors using 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 targeting the murinized part of the TCR beta domain (TCRmu) of a transgenic TCR. Here, we performed an in-depth in vitro characterization of the tracer in terms of antigen affinity, immunoreactivity, influence on T-cell functionality and stability in vitro and in vivo. Of particular interest, we have developed diverse experimental settings to quantify TCR-transgenic T cells in vivo. Local application of 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2-labeled T cells in a spot-assay revealed signal detection down to approximately 1.8x104 cells. In a more clinically relevant model, NSG mice were intravenously injected with different numbers of transgenic T cells, followed by injection of the 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 tracer, PET/CT imaging and subsequent ex vivo T-cell quantification in the tumor. Using this setting, we defined a comparable detection limit of 1.0x104 T cells. PET signals correlated well to total numbers of transgenic T cells detected ex vivo independently of the engraftment rates observed in different individual experiments. Thus, these findings confirm the high sensitivity of our novel PET/CT T-cell tracking method and provide critical information about the quantity of transgenic T cells in the tumor environment suggesting our technology being highly suitable for further clinical translation.Entities:
Keywords: In vivo T-cell imaging; T-cell quantification; T-cell receptor (TCR)-transgenic T cells.; cancer immunotherapy; immuno-PET
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28744323 PMCID: PMC5525745 DOI: 10.7150/thno.17994
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1(A) Determination of the dissociation constant (Kd) of 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 by saturation binding assays performed on TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM. The Kd was calculated by non-linear regression analysis and is shown as mean ± SD. (n=4). (B) Determination of the immunoreactive fraction of the radiotracer using serial dilutions of TCR2.5D6-transduced Jurkat76 cells. The y-intercept of the linear regression yields the percentage of the immunoreactive fraction shown here as mean ± SD. (n=3). (C) In vitro evaluation of tracer stability in different media at indicated time points shown as percentage of bound activity after incubation. (D) In vivo stability analysis of the radiotracer post intravenous injection in NSG mice at defined time points (n=3) in blood, kidneys and liver. Organ suspensions were investigated by SDS-PAGE, for the presence of intact tracer. ROIs were drawn and the signal intensities were calculated and reported as quantum level values (QL). (E) Internalization assay of 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 in TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM over 240 min. TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM were incubated with 20 nM 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 for defined time points. Fractions representing unbound (supernatant), membrane bound and internalized activity were collected and are shown as percentage (%) of initially bound activity. Total cell associated activity is presented as sum of internalized and membrane bound radiotracer. Mean ± SD of triplicates are shown.
Figure 2Impact of (A) Percentage of γH2AX-positive TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM after 1 h and 48 h of co-incubation with activities of 0 to 1000 µCi (0.0 to 37.0 MBq) 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2. Mean ± SD of triplicates are shown. (B) Percentage of EMA-positive (dead) TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM measured 1 h and 48 h after radiotracer exposure at activities of 0 to 1000 µCi (0.0 to 37.0 MBq). Mean ± SD of triplicates are shown. (C) IHC analysis of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM infiltrated ML2-B7 tumors after 48 h exposure to 2.2 ± 0.1 MBq i.v. injected 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab'). Representative IHC stainings against anti human-CD3, γH2AX and cleaved Caspase-3 of T-cell infiltrated ML2-B7 tumor tissues treated with (lower panel; n=4) and without (upper panel; n=2) radiotracer. Magnification 20X, scale bars equals to 50 µm.
Figure 3Detection limit assessment of (A) In vitro 89Zr-Df-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 labeled TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM and non-transduced TCM were mixed with Matrigel™ and s.c. injected in mice using dilutions ranging from 5x106 to 1.5x105 (I) or 1.5x105 to 4.7x103 (II) labeled TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM and non-transduced TCM. The representative 3D-PET/CT Maximum Imaging Projection images (MIP) are shown at the scale 0-20% of injected dose per gram (%ID/g) for group I and 10-20% of %ID/g for group II to allow visualization of low dilutions without noise signal. The white arrows indicate the highest dilution of detectable TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM in the respective groups. (B) Quantitative region of interest (ROI) analysis of the single injected cell spots, shown as mean activity (Bq/ml) ± SD. (A-B) One representative image of mice injected with labeled TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM (n=3) for group (I) and group (II) and for non-transduced TCM (n=2) for both groups is shown. Data of one out of two experiments are shown for both groups.
Figure 4Evaluation of the detection limit of TCR2.5D6 iRFP T(A) Representative 3D-PET (MIP) images of animal groups (I) to (IV) (n=2 for group I and IV, n=3 for group II and III) injected with decreasing numbers of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM (3x106 to 0.3x106) or non-transduced TCM (5x106) (n=2). The red arrows indicate the signal at the ML2-B7 tumor and white arrows show the control tumor ML2-B15. Scale bar 0-20 %ID/g. (B) The quantitative evaluation of activity accumulation in ML2-B7 and ML2-B15 tumors 48 h after injection of 89Zr-aTCRmu-F(ab')2 by ex vivo biodistribution analysis is shown. Mean ± SD of %ID/g are depicted for the animal groups (n=2 for group I and IV, n=3 for group II and III). The dashed line indicates background level of activity accumulation. (C) Ex vivo flow cytometry analysis of engrafted TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM at ML2-B7 and ML2-B15 tumors expressed as percentage (%) of iRFP positive cells out of hCD5/hCD45 positive cells is shown for indicated tumor samples. Mean % of iRFP positive cells are shown for the described animal groups (n=2 for group I and IV, n=3 for group II and III). (D) Correlation of detected total numbers of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM within ML2-B7 tumors and the %ID/g in the animal groups (I) to (IV). Ranges between dashed lines indicate the detection limit of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM and related activity uptake, where mean of %ID/g and total number of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM detected by flow cytometry analysis are shown.
Figure 5Correlation of TCR2.5D6 iRFP T(A) Total numbers of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM as determined ex vivo by flow cytometry quantification in ML2-B7 and ML2-B15 tumors in three from four individual experiments injected with 3.0x106 (I), 0.6x106 (II) and 0.3x106 (III) TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM. (B) Representative 3D-PET (MIP) images in respective three individual experiments injected with 3.0x106, 0.6x106 and 0.3x106 TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM. Red arrows indicate the PET signal at the ML2-B7 tumors and white arrows show the control tumor ML2-B15. Scale bars 0-20 %ID/g. (C) Quantitative ROI analysis of ML2-B7 tumors in three individual experiments with 3 animal groups injected with 3.0x106, 0.6x106 and 0.3x106 TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM depicting activity signals related to respective PET images. Mean activity [Bq/ml] of ROI analysis is shown as mean ± SD. Dotted lines indicate the level of background activities based on the control groups (n=2) in the three experiments injected with 5.0x106 non-transduced TCM (Ctrl). (A-C) The upper, middle and lower panels represent one of the three individual experiments. (D-F) Classified groups (group 1: n=9, >20.000 cells [●]; group 2: n=5, 10.000-20.000 cells [■]; group 3: n=29, <10.000 [▲]) of total number of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM with corresponding %ID/g and image-based mean activity (Bq/ml) detected in the ML2-B7 tumors derived from four experiments. Classified group 4 (n=9, [▼]) consists of ML2-B7 tumors in mice treated with non-transduced TCM (Control group). Mann-Whitney test; ****, P < 0.0001; ***, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05; n.s, non-significant.
Figure 6Immunohistochemical analysis of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TQuantitative IHC analysis of TCR2.5D6 iRFP TCM infiltrated ML2-B7 tumors after PET/CT imaging. (A) Representative 3D-PET (MIP) images of ML2-B7 tumors (n=3) with different infiltration rates and (B) corresponding IHC for CD3. Red arrows in the 3D PET-images indicate the ML2-B7 tumors. (C) Quantitative analysis of positive CD3 positive pixel based on the tissue area from the CD3 stainings. Magnification 20X, scale bar equals to 50 µm. PET scale bar 0-20 %ID/g. K=kidney.